Rock out to benefit agency

October 21, 2009
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Don’t let the name fool you: You don’t need black ties or fancy dresses to attend the first Marion County Public Defender Agency’s Public Defenders’ Ball. You just need $7 bucks and the desire to hear musicians play.

The Marion County Public Defender Agency, just like a lot of public agencies, needs money. They raise some of the needed money through bake sales and chili cook-offs, even a golf outing. Usually, the money ends up coming from people within the agency.

Assistant division chief for misdemeanors in the agency, Travis Sandifur, said the agency has a lot of fundraisers, but this is the first time they’ve had one involving a concert. The proceeds from the event will go to things not covered by their budget, such as hand sanitizer (much needed with flu season upon us), dish soap, and holiday parties, with the majority of the money going toward training.

The idea started for the ball out small. Sandifur knew one of their paralegals was in a band and thought he could play at a party. Then Sandifur realized attorney Megan von Ruhtenburg’s husband is a musician in a local band and the idea grew from there to go from a party to a concert at a music venue.

Von Ruhtenburg knows the owner of Radio Radio, a hip little venue in Fountain Square on the southeast side of Indianapolis, and the Public Defender’s Ball was born.

The fundraiser went from a couple musicians with ties to the agency to a line up of well-known local acts - Joe Welch from the Born Again Floozies; Vess Von Ruhtenberg of the Pieces, and the Lemonheads; DJ Rusty Redenbacher of the Mudkids; Pravada; Andrew Bean and the Lady Apollo with special guest Sandifur; and Bullworth. If you’re on Facebook, you can view info on the event.  Radio Radio’s Web site also has information up.

Doors open at 7 p.m. with the music getting started at 8 p.m. Oct. 23.

Sandifur said they haven’t gotten the word out too much, except through Facebook. He’s already sold more than 50 pre-sale tickets and is hoping that at least 150 people make it out for the fundraiser.

“We could always use more money. I don’t think there will ever be enough benefits,” he said.
ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. It appears the police and prosecutors are allowed to change the rules halfway through the game to suit themselves. I am surprised that the congress has not yet eliminated the right to a trial in cases involving any type of forensic evidence. That would suit their foolish law and order police state views. I say we eliminate the statute of limitations for crimes committed by members of congress and other government employees. Of course they would never do that. They are all corrupt cowards!!!

  2. Poor Judge Brown probably thought that by slavishly serving the godz of the age her violations of 18th century concepts like due process and the rule of law would be overlooked. Mayhaps she was merely a Judge ahead of her time?

  3. in a lawyer discipline case Judge Brown, now removed, was presiding over a hearing about a lawyer accused of the supposedly heinous ethical violation of saying the words "Illegal immigrant." (IN re Barker) http://www.in.gov/judiciary/files/order-discipline-2013-55S00-1008-DI-429.pdf .... I wonder if when we compare the egregious violations of due process by Judge Brown, to her chiding of another lawyer for politically incorrectness, if there are any conclusions to be drawn about what kind of person, what kind of judge, what kind of apparatchik, is busy implementing the agenda of political correctness and making off-limits legit advocacy about an adverse party in a suit whose illegal alien status is relevant? I am just asking the question, the reader can make own conclsuion. Oh wait-- did I use the wrong adjective-- let me rephrase that, um undocumented alien?

  4. of course the bigger questions of whether or not the people want to pay for ANY bussing is off limits, due to the Supreme Court protecting the people from DEMOCRACY. Several decades hence from desegregation and bussing plans and we STILL need to be taking all this taxpayer money to combat mostly-imagined "discrimination" in the most obviously failed social program of the postwar period.

  5. You can put your photos anywhere you like... When someone steals it they know it doesn't belong to them. And, a man getting a divorce is automatically not a nice guy...? That's ridiculous. Since when is need of money a conflict of interest? That would mean that no one should have a job unless they are already financially solvent without a job... A photographer is also under no obligation to use a watermark (again, people know when a photo doesn't belong to them) or provide contact information. Hey, he didn't make it easy for me to pay him so I'll just take it! Well heck, might as well walk out of the grocery store with a cart full of food because the lines are too long and you don't find that convenient. "Only in Indiana." Oh, now you're passing judgement on an entire state... What state do you live in? I need to characterize everyone in your state as ignorant and opinionated. And the final bit of ignorance; assuming a photo anyone would want is lucky and then how much does your camera have to cost to make it a good photo, in your obviously relevant opinion?

ADVERTISEMENT