Best legal city game snubs Indy

March 18, 2010
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Yes, it’s just an entertaining way to put a legal spin on the NCAA Men’s basketball tournament, but I can’t help but be a little surprised and offended that Indianapolis didn’t make the cut in the Above the Law blog’s “best city to practice law” brackets.

When writing this blog post, ATL hadn’t yet broken down the Midwest “matchups” as it had for the South and East, so I’m not sure what they were thinking when they picked other cities over Indianapolis.

Representing the Midwest are Chicago, Detroit, Kansas City/St. Louis, and Cleveland. I get that Chicago would be the No. 1 seed in this bracket – it’s the biggest legal market in the Midwest and it’s a big city. But I don’t know how sold I am on the other three (well, actually four cities) making the list before Indianapolis.

First of all, make up your mind. You can’t put both Kansas City and St. Louis. Those cities are on opposite sides of Missouri. I’d understand Kansas City Mo./Kansas City, Kan., but there are hundreds of miles between Kansas City and St. Louis. If they are so similar, just pick one.

Secondly, Indianapolis has a lot going for it. Affordability, a good quality of life, and it’s a sports mecca. Indy got so much going for it, the NCAA relocated here from Kansas more than 10 years ago.

Phil Isenbarger, partner at Bingham McHale in Indianapolis, says it’s the same things that made Indianapolis attractive to the NCAA headquarters that make it attractive to attorneys. It’s got good restaurants, many events happening, tons of sports – amateur and professional, it’s easy to get around downtown, and people are just friendly here.

In fact, our Hoosier hospitality spills over into the legal community and is one of the reasons practicing in Indy is great. Isenbarger has worked with attorneys from outside of Indiana, and all have consistently said our lawyers are friendly.

“Never in 26 years of practicing has anyone said anything other than that when visiting,” he said.

While that’s a quality many Midwesterners have, Isenbarger said Indianapolis is more friendly than some of the other cities listed in ATL’s Midwest bracket.

“The great thing about Indianapolis is the lawyers here understand that you can advocate for your client without being a jerk to the lawyer on the other side,” he said.

The civility Indianapolis attorneys display is in part thanks to the efforts of the Indianapolis Bar Association in making sure new lawyers understand that is an important quality, he said.

Isenbarger, whom I should mention is an NCAA Champion from the 1981 Indiana University basketball team, also pointed out that Chicago may be bigger but it doesn’t mean their legal issues are bigger or better than the ones Indianapolis attorneys deal with. They just have more of them because of the number of people living there. Being bigger doesn’t improve the quality of practice, Isenbarger said.

Finally, if Indianapolis isn’t a best place to practice, then why do so many firms from outside of the state want to merge with firms here? In the last year or so, three Indy firms have merged with firms from Ohio. There have also been rumors of other out-of-state firms trying to merge with Indianapolis firms. They see the potential to set up shop here, the quality of lawyers, and value of the established legal practices Indy firms have to offer.

Other states value Indianapolis, why don’t you ATL?
ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. Just an aside, but regardless of the outcome, I 'm proud of Judge William Hughes. He was the original magistrate on the Home place issue. He ruled for Home Place, and was primaried by Brainard for it. Their tool Poindexter failed to unseat Hughes, who won support for his honesty and courage throughout the county, and he was reelected Judge of Hamilton County's Superior Court. You can still stand for something and survive. Thanks, Judge Hughes!

  2. CCHP's real accomplishment is the 2015 law signed by Gov Pence that basically outlaws any annexation that is forced where a 65% majority of landowners in the affected area disagree. Regardless of whether HP wins or loses, the citizens of Indiana will not have another fiasco like this. The law Gov Pence signed is a direct result of this malgovernance.

  3. I gave tempparry guardship to a friend of my granddaughter in 2012. I went to prison. I had custody. My daughter went to prison to. We are out. My daughter gave me custody but can get her back. She was not order to give me custody . but now we want granddaughter back from friend. She's 14 now. What rights do we have

  4. This sure is not what most who value good governance consider the Rule of Law to entail: "In a letter dated March 2, which Brizzi forwarded to IBJ, the commission dismissed the grievance “on grounds that there is not reasonable cause to believe that you are guilty of misconduct.”" Yet two month later reasonable cause does exist? (Or is the commission forging ahead, the need for reasonable belief be damned? -- A seeming violation of the Rules of Profession Ethics on the part of the commission) Could the rule of law theory cause one to believe that an explanation is in order? Could it be that Hoosier attorneys live under Imperial Law (which is also a t-word that rhymes with infamy) in which the Platonic guardians can do no wrong and never owe the plebeian class any explanation for their powerful actions. (Might makes it right?) Could this be a case of politics directing the commission, as celebrated IU Mauer Professor (the late) Patrick Baude warned was happening 20 years ago in his controversial (whisteblowing) ethics lecture on a quite similar topic: http://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1498&context=ilj

  5. I have a case presently pending cert review before the SCOTUS that reveals just how Indiana regulates the bar. I have been denied licensure for life for holding the wrong views and questioning the grand inquisitors as to their duties as to state and federal constitutional due process. True story: https://www.scribd.com/doc/299040839/2016Petitionforcert-to-SCOTUS Shorter, Amici brief serving to frame issue as misuse of govt licensure: https://www.scribd.com/doc/312841269/Thomas-More-Society-Amicus-Brown-v-Ind-Bd-of-Law-Examiners

ADVERTISEMENT