Dreaming of home ownership

April 21, 2010
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

This post was written by IL reporter Rebecca Berfanger

Minutes after I turned in Tuesday's IL Daily story about a new initiative by the Indiana Supreme Court and the Indiana Foreclosure Prevention Network, I got an e-mail from the Indianapolis Neighborhood Housing Partnership about 'Reclaiming the American Dream,' a documentary set to air on the Indianapolis PBS affiliate WFYI at 7:30 p.m. Thursday.

The documentary will include national and local experts' opinions on mortgage foreclosures, how the ideal of owning a home has changed over the years, and will also follow people in Indianapolis and Detroit as they strive to achieve the American dream of homeownership.

Lilly Endowment Inc. funded the project, which is a partnership between WFYI and INHP. The documentary was produced by filmmaker Kim Hood Jacobs.

Not having seen the documentary, I plan to tune in Thursday night. I'm hoping it'll include some glint of happy news, as I've been following mortgage foreclosures for Indiana Lawyer for a while now ' including how other news sources have been covering it ' and most of the news so far has been grim.

Even when I hear news reports explaining foreclosure numbers are decreasing slightly, or at least compared to the same time a year ago, I immediately start to wonder whether those numbers really mean anything as I continue to hear of friends of friends and relatives who have lost their homes in recent months. In working on a story for the April 28 edition, I'm also learning that Indiana's numbers are staying strong or slightly increasing ' and that Indiana is 11th in the country for foreclosures.

I also look forward to the documentary for personal reasons; last summer, I was able to buy my first house with the help of INHP's staff and free community programs. Like others who work with them, the organization will look over financial statements and credit reports, and will give potential homeowners different loan options if INHP thinks a potential buyer is qualified. And if they're not a good candidate for a loan, INHP offers classes and other resources to help people learn what they can do to become more financially stable and raise their credit scores.

So will you watch? Do you think we'll eventually see a decrease in foreclosures in Indiana any time soon?

ADVERTISEMENT
  • It\'s a complicated issue and I would guess we all know someone in that mess for the right and wrong reasons. Did someone buy a home that was out of their league and unrealistic about their ability to pay. I\'m not talking about the uninformed; I\'m thinking about those living a fake lifestyle on borrowed money. I will try to tape the documentary and see if sheds any light on the matter.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. Major social engineering imposed by judicial order well in advance of democratic change, has been the story of the whole post ww2 period. Contraception, desegregation, abortion, gay marriage: all rammed down the throats of Americans who didn't vote to change existing laws on any such thing, by the unelected lifetime tenure Supreme court heirarchs. Maybe people came to accept those things once imposed upon them, but, that's accommodation not acceptance; and surely not democracy. So let's quit lying to the kids telling them this is a democracy. Some sort of oligarchy, but no democracy that's for sure, and it never was. A bourgeois republic from day one.

  2. JD Massur, yes, brings to mind a similar stand at a Texas Mission in 1836. Or Vladivostok in 1918. As you seemingly gloat, to the victors go the spoils ... let the looting begin, right?

  3. I always wondered why high fence deer hunting was frowned upon? I guess you need to keep the population steady. If you don't, no one can enjoy hunting! Thanks for the post! Fence

  4. Whether you support "gay marriage" or not is not the issue. The issue is whether the SCOTUS can extract from an unmentionable somewhere the notion that the Constitution forbids government "interference" in the "right" to marry. Just imagine time-traveling to Philadelphia in 1787. Ask James Madison if the document he and his fellows just wrote allowed him- or forbade government to "interfere" with- his "right" to marry George Washington? He would have immediately- and justly- summoned the Sergeant-at-Arms to throw your sorry self out into the street. Far from being a day of liberation, this is a day of capitulation by the Rule of Law to the Rule of What's Happening Now.

  5. With today's ruling, AG Zoeller's arguments in the cases of Obamacare and Same-sex Marriage can be relegated to the ash heap of history. 0-fer

ADVERTISEMENT