IL reporter Rebecca Berfanger contributed today’s blog post.
Do you recognize anyone you know on this list?
It’s the annual order of suspension of attorneys who haven’t paid their registration fees on time and/or they
haven’t completed the required number of CLE hours.
The full list of 256 suspended attorneys licensed to practice in Indiana was issued May 14 and posted online today.
While looking at the list as a staff, we noticed attorneys who’ve been in the news recently for good and bad reasons,
at least one judge, and 112 attorneys with out of state addresses.
As for the 144 attorneys listed with Indiana addresses: 105 lawyers were behind on registration fees, and 67 didn’t
meet CLE requirements. Mixed in with those two groups were 28 lawyers who didn’t do either.
These numbers do not include the attorneys who have asked for and have been granted extensions to fulfill these requirements,
according to the order.
Every year I wonder how so many attorneys slip by without meeting these seemingly simple requirements.
Even as a non-attorney I often see notices about CLE courses: I hear about pro bono districts that provide free CLE in exchange
for taking on a case or participating in a Talk to a Lawyer Today program; county bar association newsletters include prominently
placed CLE calendars; the law school events calendars I check for story ideas often offer CLE credits for specialized topics;
and of course ICLEF’s website has links to CLE events.
And just in case you missed it, IL daily has a link to our CLE calendar at the bottom of every e-mail we send.
I also often hear from sources that CLE is expensive and not always easy to fit into one’s schedule of trials and client
meetings, but I’ve yet to hear a source tell me there’s any reason they do not do it.
If your name is on here – what’s your excuse?








Jack, I was only responding to bill's comment of tying everybody in government together. I agree with you though, it takes one bad apple to ruin the bunch.. As in any profession. What's truly unfair is when somebody violates someone's trust and takes complete advantage of someone
John’s comment is unfair. The majority of attorneys can be trusted. Unfortunately, all it takes is one greedy, unscrupulous, immoral attorney to jade the public.
In regards to bill's comment about trusting the cover meant. We can trust them about as much as we can trust attorneys'.
This is disturbing to learn...
Yikes!