The newest crop of law school graduates are about to take the July bar exam, except for the ones who are convicted felons.
You can’t be a felon and a lawyer in Indiana but if you are already an attorney and commit a felony, you could keep
your license.
It doesn’t make sense to me.
Based on Admission and Discipline Rule 12, anyone convicted of a felony “prima facie” shall be deemed lacking
good moral character. As you know, you must have good moral character to join the bar. Possibly there have been exceptions
to this, but I imagine it’s a high standard to overcome to prove to the character and fitness committee that your felony
record won’t affect your ability to be a lawyer.
What if you committed the felony when you were 18 and you are now 30? You’ve paid your time and in the grand scheme
of felonies, it was minor and won’t affect your ability to practice law. I guess you’ll have to prove it.
Something must happen once you become a lawyer because if you don’t have a felony in your past, but commit one while
an attorney, you could still remain an attorney. Chances are you’ll be suspended, or disbarred if it’s bad enough,
but attorneys who commit felonies can retain their admission to the bar.
Why do the standards for good moral character change? If having a felony deems you “prima facie” lacking in good
moral character, shouldn’t being convicted of one while an attorney “prima facie” mean automatic disbarment,
and shouldn’t the burden of proof be on the felonious lawyer to prove he/she should get to keep his/her law license?
The fact that it’s not this way smells like a double standard to me.
But attorney discipline is fluid and it’s hard to concretely say that “if you do X you’ll receive Y as
a punishment.” A lot depends on agreements between the lawyer and the Disciplinary Commission. Sometimes attorneys who
appear to have committed more serious offenses are given the same or lesser punishment than one who appears to have committed
a less serious offense. But that’s the nature of our disciplinary process. What do you think?








Conversations
1 Comments
Add Comment
www.archangelinstitute.org (see Orwell post)