Counseling programs for homebuyers discussed at event

August 25, 2010
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

This post was written by IL reporter Rebecca Berfanger.

While the Indiana Foreclosure Prevention Network continues its efforts to help prevent foreclosures through resources for loan modifications and other help for homeowners, including upcoming sessions at National Guard Armories around the state on Sept. 1, local organizations continue their work on the issue as well.

For instance, the Indianapolis Neighborhood Housing Partnership helps homeowners avoid foreclosure from the early stages of homeownership. INHP has provided counseling to homeowners before, during, and after the process of buying a home for 22 years. During its 2010 fiscal year, 1,715 families graduated from the organization’s money management or home-buyer education classes.

To celebrate the organization’s achievements and promote its current theme of Healthy Neighborhoods, Strong City, the organization hosted a breakfast Tuesday morning that featured CEO and president of the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, Charles L. Evans. The Fed had worked with INHP on a study of their counseling efforts, something Evans praised during his speech.

Even though INHP clients may have had lower credit scores and lower down payments compared with other borrowers, they had lower default rates on their mortgages – 3.8 percent compared with 6.3 percent for borrowers who had not gone through INHP’s counseling program, he said.

INHP will also tell potential home buyers if they are not in a good position to buy a home at this time, but they will work with them to help improve their credit scores and savings – but only if the client is also willing to work for it. Going through the program is not a guaranteed ticket to homeownership, but it will prepare those who are ready and qualified.

Evans compared the INHP counseling program to one in Chicago, which required counseling for home buyers looking to take out risky loan products. While that counseling program was found to have little effect, it still worked, he said, in the sense that because borrowers decided not to go through the required counseling for risky loans, they were less likely to take out high-risk loans. Instead, they would look for loans that didn’t require counseling.

Evans added some lenders with high-risk loans also decided to leave the market rather than go through the counseling programs and potentially be accused of predatory lending, which could also be considered something that made the program successful.

In addition to Evans’ address and question and answer session about the economy, the event included an inspiring performance by and a standing ovation for someone who was personally helped by INHP. The Harris family – Jonathan, Devonia, and their four young children – participated in the program for two years to get their credit and savings back on track to buy a home near the liberal arts high school where Jonathan teaches choir. To thank INHP and the supporters at the breakfast, he sang “You’ll Never Walk Alone.” He said the song should be the anthem of anyone who goes through what he called the “INHP Academy to Home Ownership.”

While it may be too late for those already in foreclosure who have exhausted their options or abandoned their properties, should counseling programs like the ones offered by INHP receive more attention and be more widely used on the front end to avoid future waves of foreclosures?
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. It appears the police and prosecutors are allowed to change the rules halfway through the game to suit themselves. I am surprised that the congress has not yet eliminated the right to a trial in cases involving any type of forensic evidence. That would suit their foolish law and order police state views. I say we eliminate the statute of limitations for crimes committed by members of congress and other government employees. Of course they would never do that. They are all corrupt cowards!!!

  2. Poor Judge Brown probably thought that by slavishly serving the godz of the age her violations of 18th century concepts like due process and the rule of law would be overlooked. Mayhaps she was merely a Judge ahead of her time?

  3. in a lawyer discipline case Judge Brown, now removed, was presiding over a hearing about a lawyer accused of the supposedly heinous ethical violation of saying the words "Illegal immigrant." (IN re Barker) http://www.in.gov/judiciary/files/order-discipline-2013-55S00-1008-DI-429.pdf .... I wonder if when we compare the egregious violations of due process by Judge Brown, to her chiding of another lawyer for politically incorrectness, if there are any conclusions to be drawn about what kind of person, what kind of judge, what kind of apparatchik, is busy implementing the agenda of political correctness and making off-limits legit advocacy about an adverse party in a suit whose illegal alien status is relevant? I am just asking the question, the reader can make own conclsuion. Oh wait-- did I use the wrong adjective-- let me rephrase that, um undocumented alien?

  4. of course the bigger questions of whether or not the people want to pay for ANY bussing is off limits, due to the Supreme Court protecting the people from DEMOCRACY. Several decades hence from desegregation and bussing plans and we STILL need to be taking all this taxpayer money to combat mostly-imagined "discrimination" in the most obviously failed social program of the postwar period.

  5. You can put your photos anywhere you like... When someone steals it they know it doesn't belong to them. And, a man getting a divorce is automatically not a nice guy...? That's ridiculous. Since when is need of money a conflict of interest? That would mean that no one should have a job unless they are already financially solvent without a job... A photographer is also under no obligation to use a watermark (again, people know when a photo doesn't belong to them) or provide contact information. Hey, he didn't make it easy for me to pay him so I'll just take it! Well heck, might as well walk out of the grocery store with a cart full of food because the lines are too long and you don't find that convenient. "Only in Indiana." Oh, now you're passing judgement on an entire state... What state do you live in? I need to characterize everyone in your state as ignorant and opinionated. And the final bit of ignorance; assuming a photo anyone would want is lucky and then how much does your camera have to cost to make it a good photo, in your obviously relevant opinion?

ADVERTISEMENT