Counseling programs for homebuyers discussed at event

August 25, 2010
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

This post was written by IL reporter Rebecca Berfanger.

While the Indiana Foreclosure Prevention Network continues its efforts to help prevent foreclosures through resources for loan modifications and other help for homeowners, including upcoming sessions at National Guard Armories around the state on Sept. 1, local organizations continue their work on the issue as well.

For instance, the Indianapolis Neighborhood Housing Partnership helps homeowners avoid foreclosure from the early stages of homeownership. INHP has provided counseling to homeowners before, during, and after the process of buying a home for 22 years. During its 2010 fiscal year, 1,715 families graduated from the organization’s money management or home-buyer education classes.

To celebrate the organization’s achievements and promote its current theme of Healthy Neighborhoods, Strong City, the organization hosted a breakfast Tuesday morning that featured CEO and president of the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, Charles L. Evans. The Fed had worked with INHP on a study of their counseling efforts, something Evans praised during his speech.

Even though INHP clients may have had lower credit scores and lower down payments compared with other borrowers, they had lower default rates on their mortgages – 3.8 percent compared with 6.3 percent for borrowers who had not gone through INHP’s counseling program, he said.

INHP will also tell potential home buyers if they are not in a good position to buy a home at this time, but they will work with them to help improve their credit scores and savings – but only if the client is also willing to work for it. Going through the program is not a guaranteed ticket to homeownership, but it will prepare those who are ready and qualified.

Evans compared the INHP counseling program to one in Chicago, which required counseling for home buyers looking to take out risky loan products. While that counseling program was found to have little effect, it still worked, he said, in the sense that because borrowers decided not to go through the required counseling for risky loans, they were less likely to take out high-risk loans. Instead, they would look for loans that didn’t require counseling.

Evans added some lenders with high-risk loans also decided to leave the market rather than go through the counseling programs and potentially be accused of predatory lending, which could also be considered something that made the program successful.

In addition to Evans’ address and question and answer session about the economy, the event included an inspiring performance by and a standing ovation for someone who was personally helped by INHP. The Harris family – Jonathan, Devonia, and their four young children – participated in the program for two years to get their credit and savings back on track to buy a home near the liberal arts high school where Jonathan teaches choir. To thank INHP and the supporters at the breakfast, he sang “You’ll Never Walk Alone.” He said the song should be the anthem of anyone who goes through what he called the “INHP Academy to Home Ownership.”

While it may be too late for those already in foreclosure who have exhausted their options or abandoned their properties, should counseling programs like the ones offered by INHP receive more attention and be more widely used on the front end to avoid future waves of foreclosures?
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. Indianapolis employers harassment among minorities AFRICAN Americans needs to be discussed the metro Indianapolis area is horrible when it comes to harassing African American employees especially in the local healthcare facilities. Racially profiling in the workplace is an major issue. Please make it better because I'm many civil rights leaders would come here and justify that Indiana is a state the WORKS only applies to Caucasian Americans especially in Hamilton county. Indiana targets African Americans in the workplace so when governor pence is trying to convince people to vote for him this would be awesome publicity for the Presidency Elections.

  2. Wishing Mary Willis only God's best, and superhuman strength, as she attempts to right a ship that too often strays far off course. May she never suffer this personal affect, as some do who attempt to change a broken system: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QojajMsd2nE

  3. Indiana's seatbelt law is not punishable as a crime. It is an infraction. Apparently some of our Circuit judges have deemed settled law inapplicable if it fails to fit their litmus test of political correctness. Extrapolating to redefine terms of behavior in a violation of immigration law to the entire body of criminal law leaves a smorgasbord of opportunity for judicial mischief.

  4. I wonder if $10 diversions for failure to wear seat belts are considered moral turpitude in federal immigration law like they are under Indiana law? Anyone know?

  5. What a fine article, thank you! I can testify firsthand and by detailed legal reports (at end of this note) as to the dire consequences of rejecting this truth from the fine article above: "The inclusion and expansion of this right [to jury] in Indiana’s Constitution is a clear reflection of our state’s intention to emphasize the importance of every Hoosier’s right to make their case in front of a jury of their peers." Over $20? Every Hoosier? Well then how about when your very vocation is on the line? How about instead of a jury of peers, one faces a bevy of political appointees, mini-czars, who care less about due process of the law than the real czars did? Instead of trial by jury, trial by ideological ordeal run by Orwellian agents? Well that is built into more than a few administrative law committees of the Ind S.Ct., and it is now being weaponized, as is revealed in articles posted at this ezine, to root out post moderns heresies like refusal to stand and pledge allegiance to all things politically correct. My career was burned at the stake for not so saluting, but I think I was just one of the early logs. Due, at least in part, to the removal of the jury from bar admission and bar discipline cases, many more fires will soon be lit. Perhaps one awaits you, dear heretic? Oh, at that Ind. article 12 plank about a remedy at law for every damage done ... ah, well, the founders evidently meant only for those damages done not by the government itself, rabid statists that they were. (Yes, that was sarcasm.) My written reports available here: Denied petition for cert (this time around): http://tinyurl.com/zdmawmw Denied petition for cert (from the 2009 denial and five year banishment): http://tinyurl.com/zcypybh Related, not written by me: Amicus brief: http://tinyurl.com/hvh7qgp

ADVERTISEMENT