Students, judges, lawyers, and reporters participate in Constitution Day

September 20, 2010
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

This post was written by IL reporter Rebecca Berfanger

If you have a few minutes, fill out this “treasure hunt” regarding the different articles, sections, and amendments of the U.S. and Indiana constitutions that discuss certain issues such as religion, slavery, arms, suffrage, freedom of speech, trial by jury, and education.

How did you do?

That was the same task assigned to students from Crispus Attucks Medical Magnet High School, Indian Creek High School, Emmerich Manual High School, Lawrence North High School, Franklin Home School Group, and other home school groups in the Indiana Supreme Court’s courtroom on Sept. 17 to commemorate the signing of the U.S. Constitution on that day in 1787.

Armed with their own pocket versions of the U.S. and Indiana constitutions, students were broken into small discussion groups about these topics led by various law clerks and court staff from around Indianapolis, including journalists like myself and IL editor and publisher Rebecca Collier.

Also on hand to speak with students were Elizabeth Osborn, assistant to the chief justice for court history and public education, and Kathryn Dolan, public information officer, who gave a welcome and explained why the court hosts students to celebrate Constitution Day; Dan Carden, Indiana Statehouse reporter for the Times of Northwest Indiana, who talked about how rights in the constitutions affect everyday citizens by protecting members of the press and the public; statehouse reporter Maureen Hayden for CHNI News Service led a reading of the U.S. Constitution’s preamble and the Bill of Rights; and Indiana Court of Appeals Judge Cale J. Bradford and U.S. District Court Judge Larry J. McKinney discussed how the U.S. Constitution affects the daily lives of citizens, including the students in the room, whether they think about it very often or not.

To watch the speakers address the students as a whole, visit the Courts in the Classroom website for a webcast from that day.

Students who were or would be 18 by election day on Nov. 2 were also given a chance to register to vote and ask questions of a representative from the Secretary of State’s office, who was on hand at the end.

In my group of AP Government students from Emmerich Manual High School, most students seemed to know the more obvious answers, but I was also impressed by their understanding of the way the two constitutions are similar yet different, based on what they’ve learned from their teacher.

While Constitution Day is meant as a way for students to take some time to learn or relearn the role the constitution plays in our society on that particular day, it’s obvious that it’s still important the other 364 days of the year. To get involved with civics education in Indiana, check in with a school in your area, or check out the Indiana Bar Foundation’s website. Or if you know a teacher interested in Courts in the Classroom projects, visit the court’s website for info on upcoming events.

And if you took the time to fill out the treasure hunt from earlier – or just want to know the answers – here is the answer key.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. Actually, and most strikingly, the ruling failed to address the central issue to the whole case: Namely, Black Knight/LPS, who was NEVER a party to the State court litigation, and who is under a 2013 consent judgment in Indiana (where it has stipulated to the forgery of loan documents, the ones specifically at issue in my case)never disclosed itself in State court or remediated the forged loan documents as was REQUIRED of them by the CJ. In essence, what the court is willfully ignoring, is that it is setting a precedent that the supplier of a defective product, one whom is under a consent judgment stipulating to such, and under obligation to remediate said defective product, can: 1.) Ignore the CJ 2.) Allow counsel to commit fraud on the state court 3.) Then try to hide behind Rooker Feldman doctrine as a bar to being held culpable in federal court. The problem here is the court is in direct conflict with its own ruling(s) in Johnson v. Pushpin Holdings & Iqbal- 780 F.3d 728, at 730 “What Johnson adds - what the defendants in this suit have failed to appreciate—is that federal courts retain jurisdiction to award damages for fraud that imposes extrajudicial injury. The Supreme Court drew that very line in Exxon Mobil ... Iqbal alleges that the defendants conducted a racketeering enterprise that predates the state court’s judgments ...but Exxon Mobil shows that the Rooker Feldman doctrine asks what injury the plaintiff asks the federal court to redress, not whether the injury is “intertwined” with something else …Because Iqbal seeks damages for activity that (he alleges) predates the state litigation and caused injury independently of it, the Rooker-Feldman doctrine does not block this suit. It must be reinstated.” So, as I already noted to others, I now have the chance to bring my case to SCOTUS; the ruling by Wood & Posner is flawed on numerous levels,BUT most troubling is the fact that the authors KNOW it's a flawed ruling and choose to ignore the flaws for one simple reason: The courts have decided to agree with former AG Eric Holder that national banks "Are too big to fail" and must win at any cost-even that of due process, case precedent, & the truth....Let's see if SCOTUS wants a bite at the apple.

  2. I am in NJ & just found out that there is a judgment against me in an action by Driver's Solutions LLC in IN. I was never served with any Court pleadings, etc. and the only thing that I can find out is that they were using an old Staten Island NY address for me. I have been in NJ for over 20 years and cannot get any response from Drivers Solutions in IN. They have a different lawyer now. I need to get this vacated or stopped - it is now almost double & at 18%. Any help would be appreciated. Thank you.

  3. I am in NJ & just found out that there is a judgment against me in an action by Driver's Solutions LLC in IN. I was never served with any Court pleadings, etc. and the only thing that I can find out is that they were using an old Staten Island NY address for me. I have been in NJ for over 20 years and cannot get any response from Drivers Solutions in IN. They have a different lawyer now. I need to get this vacated or stopped - it is now almost double & at 18%. Any help would be appreciated. Thank you.

  4. Please I need help with my class action lawsuits, im currently in pro-se and im having hard time findiNG A LAWYER TO ASSIST ME

  5. Access to the court (judiciary branch of government) is the REAL problem, NOT necessarily lack of access to an attorney. Unfortunately, I've lived in a legal and financial hell for the past six years due to a divorce (where I was, supposedly, represented by an attorney) in which I was defrauded of settlement and the other party (and helpers) enriched through the fraud. When I attempted to introduce evidence and testify (pro se) in a foreclosure/eviction, I was silenced (apparently on procedural grounds, as research I've done since indicates). I was thrown out of a residence which was to be sold, by a judge who refused to allow me to speak in (the supposedly "informal") small claims court where the eviction proceeding (by ex-brother-in-law) was held. Six years and I can't even get back on solid or stable ground ... having bank account seized twice, unlawfully ... and now, for the past year, being dragged into court - again, contrary to law and appellate decisions - by former attorney, who is trying to force payment from exempt funds. Friday will mark fifth appearance. Hopefully, I'll be allowed to speak. The situation I find myself in shouldn't even be possible, much less dragging out with no end in sight, for years. I've done nothing wrong, but am watching a lot of wrong being accomplished under court jurisdiction; only because I was married to someone who wanted and was granted a divorce (but was not willing to assume the responsibilities that come with granting the divorce). In fact, the recalcitrant party was enriched by well over $100k, although it was necessarily split with other actors. Pro bono help? It's a nice dream ... but that's all it is, for too many. Meanwhile, injustice marches on.

ADVERTISEMENT