Students learn about elections in time for today's registration deadline

October 4, 2010
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

This post was written by IL reporter Rebecca Berfanger.

Today is the last day to register to vote in the Nov. 2 midterm election in Indiana – it was also the last day for the Marion County clerk to speak with high school students as part of her yVote program about what they need to know to vote, including an opportunity for students who are or will be 18 by Nov. 2 to register.

Clerk Beth White spoke to an AP Government class at Herron High School just north of downtown Indianapolis today about the basics, including who can vote, who they can vote for in this particular election, how they can register to vote, where they can vote, and what they ultimately need to vote.

That included discussions about what kinds of photo IDs are acceptable – the student IDs weren’t acceptable because even though they had photos, even though they didn’t include middle names the first and last name on the ID was possibly close enough to the students’ registered names for a poll volunteer to accept them, and the IDs were government issued (Herron is a public school), they did not have a valid expiration date of month, day, year, just the school year 2010-11.

White also led a discussion about whether prisoners and those with criminal records should be allowed to vote. Of the students White has met with in this class and in 13 other schools around Marion County, opinions on the subject ranged from all people should be able to vote regardless of criminal background, to anyone who has ever been convicted of a crime shouldn’t be able to vote again, she said. However, if someone is in jail awaiting trial and they haven’t yet been convicted, they can vote with assistance from a group the clerk’s office sends to the jails.

She also said while she didn’t mention it to the class, she was aware of a lawsuit in northern Indiana regarding the voting rights of those who had criminal records that could someday change or at least better define the law in Indiana. Currently, it’s unclear regarding whether people with felonies or misdemeanors are included or excluded, only that once someone has served their time and is no longer on parole, they can likely vote in Indiana. The class also discussed how different states have different takes on this.

She added that in another high school, one student said her father was in prison and that during the 2008 presidential election, the two of them would discuss how he was upset he was unable to vote for the first African-American president because he was incarcerated at the time.

Toward the end of the class, students were able to cast a ballot and were given an “I vote I count” sticker. They could vote for president – John Stewart was the Democratic candidate, Stephen Colbert was the Republican candidate, and Jesse “The Body” Ventura was the independent. Colbert won, Stewart was second, and there were a couple write-ins, including one student who said he wrote in “Jesus.”

As for best president, Franklin Delano Roosevelt won over Abraham Lincoln “in a landslide,” she said. Oprah Winfrey, the independent candidate, received the most votes for first female president, with Hillary Clinton as the Democratic candidate a close second. Sarah Palin was the Republican candidate.

The Kennedys were voted the best political family, followed by a tie for the Tafts and Clintons for second (participants could vote for two families in this category) and the Bush family was “not even close,” White told students. There was also a write-in for the Roosevelts in this category.

When asked if voters should show ID to vote, 23 voted in favor, and three were opposed. As far as requiring term limits for members of Congress, it was 20-6 in favor of term limits.

All in all, White said after speaking with classes around the county, the part she enjoyed most was seeing the students interact with each other. This particular class was interesting because students tended to be more open about their political views, she said. A couple students who happened to sit on the right side of the classroom were not shy about supporting Republican candidates simply because they were Republican.

She added that of all the classes she has visited, overall the students always seem to enjoy learning about the election process.

Voter registration ends today, including a new online voter registration option. This includes anyone who has moved, has recently changed their name, or hasn’t registered before.

White also mentioned she is still looking for volunteers to work the polls on Election Day – including high school students who are 16 or 17 with at least a 3.0 GPA and with permission from their school and their parents or guardians. For anyone else who would like to volunteer to work the polls, they need to be a registered voter, reside in the county where they want to work, and must go through training. More information about participating in the voting process is available on the clerk’s website, or on the Indiana Secretary of State’s Election Division website.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. He called our nation a nation of cowards because we didn't want to talk about race. That was a cheap shot coming from the top cop. The man who decides who gets the federal government indicts. Wow. Not a gentleman if that is the measure. More importantly, this insult delivered as we all understand, to white people-- without him or anybody needing to explain that is precisely what he meant-- but this is an insult to timid white persons who fear the government and don't want to say anything about race for fear of being accused a racist. With all the legal heat that can come down on somebody if they say something which can be construed by a prosecutor like Mr Holder as racist, is it any wonder white people-- that's who he meant obviously-- is there any surprise that white people don't want to talk about race? And as lawyers we have even less freedom lest our remarks be considered violations of the rules. Mr Holder also demonstrated his bias by publically visiting with the family of the young man who was killed by a police offering in the line of duty, which was a very strong indicator of bias agains the offer who is under investigation, and was a failure to lead properly by letting his investigators do their job without him predetermining the proper outcome. He also has potentially biased the jury pool. All in all this worsens race relations by feeding into the perception shared by whites as well as blacks that justice will not be impartial. I will say this much, I do not blame Obama for all of HOlder's missteps. Obama has done a lot of things to stay above the fray and try and be a leader for all Americans. Maybe he should have reigned Holder in some but Obama's got his hands full with other problelms. Oh did I mention HOlder is a bank crony who will probably get a job in a silkstocking law firm working for millions of bucks a year defending bankers whom he didn't have the integrity or courage to hold to account for their acts of fraud on the United States, other financial institutions, and the people. His tenure will be regarded by history as a failure of leadership at one of the most important jobs in our nation. Finally and most importantly besides him insulting the public and letting off the big financial cheats, he has been at the forefront of over-prosecuting the secrecy laws to punish whistleblowers and chill free speech. What has Holder done to vindicate the rights of privacy of the American public against the illegal snooping of the NSA? He could have charged NSA personnel with violations of law for their warrantless wiretapping which has been done millions of times and instead he did not persecute a single soul. That is a defalcation of historical proportions and it signals to the public that the government DOJ under him was not willing to do a damn thing to protect the public against the rapid growth of the illegal surveillance state. Who else could have done this? Nobody. And for that omission Obama deserves the blame too. Here were are sliding into a police state and Eric Holder made it go all the faster.

  2. JOE CLAYPOOL candidate for Superior Court in Harrison County - Indiana This candidate is misleading voters to think he is a Judge by putting Elect Judge Joe Claypool on his campaign literature. paragraphs 2 and 9 below clearly indicate this injustice to voting public to gain employment. What can we do? Indiana Code - Section 35-43-5-3: Deception (a) A person who: (1) being an officer, manager, or other person participating in the direction of a credit institution, knowingly or intentionally receives or permits the receipt of a deposit or other investment, knowing that the institution is insolvent; (2) knowingly or intentionally makes a false or misleading written statement with intent to obtain property, employment, or an educational opportunity; (3) misapplies entrusted property, property of a governmental entity, or property of a credit institution in a manner that the person knows is unlawful or that the person knows involves substantial risk of loss or detriment to either the owner of the property or to a person for whose benefit the property was entrusted; (4) knowingly or intentionally, in the regular course of business, either: (A) uses or possesses for use a false weight or measure or other device for falsely determining or recording the quality or quantity of any commodity; or (B) sells, offers, or displays for sale or delivers less than the represented quality or quantity of any commodity; (5) with intent to defraud another person furnishing electricity, gas, water, telecommunication, or any other utility service, avoids a lawful charge for that service by scheme or device or by tampering with facilities or equipment of the person furnishing the service; (6) with intent to defraud, misrepresents the identity of the person or another person or the identity or quality of property; (7) with intent to defraud an owner of a coin machine, deposits a slug in that machine; (8) with intent to enable the person or another person to deposit a slug in a coin machine, makes, possesses, or disposes of a slug; (9) disseminates to the public an advertisement that the person knows is false, misleading, or deceptive, with intent to promote the purchase or sale of property or the acceptance of employment;

  3. The story that you have shared is quite interesting and also the information is very helpful. Thanks for sharing the article. For more info: http://www.treasurecoastbailbonds.com/

  4. I grew up on a farm and live in the county and it's interesting that the big industrial farmers like Jeff Shoaf don't live next to their industrial operations...

  5. So that none are misinformed by my posting wihtout a non de plume here, please allow me to state that I am NOT an Indiana licensed attorney, although I am an Indiana resident approved to practice law and represent clients in Indiana's fed court of Nth Dist and before the 7th circuit. I remain licensed in KS, since 1996, no discipline. This must be clarified since the IN court records will reveal that I did sit for and pass the Indiana bar last February. Yet be not confused by the fact that I was so allowed to be tested .... I am not, to be clear in the service of my duty to be absolutely candid about this, I AM NOT a member of the Indiana bar, and might never be so licensed given my unrepented from errors of thought documented in this opinion, at fn2, which likely supports Mr Smith's initial post in this thread: http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-7th-circuit/1592921.html

ADVERTISEMENT