COA judge blogs from Kenya

January 27, 2011
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Reporter Rebecca Berfanger wrote this post.

Indiana Court of Appeals Judge Patricia Riley is in Kenya this week and has started a daily blog of her trip. On the blog, which she plans to update daily, she will share her experiences with the Indiana legal community and anyone else who is interested in the work of the Legal Aid Centre of Eldoret. The effort is a partnership of Indiana University Medical School, the law school and medical school at Moi University in Kenya, Indiana University School of Law – Indianapolis, and lawyers and judges in Kenya and Indiana.

So far, she has described the legal clinic and her first two days in Nairobi, Kenya’s capital city.

Since her first trip to Kenya in 2006 for safari, she has traveled there a handful of times to help set up and sustain LACE, which opened officially in October 2008.

“In 2009, LACE represented and counseled 336 HIV-positive clients in cases including: land and inheritance issues, gender-based violence prosecutions, defense from debt collection and criminal charges, and family law and defamation claims associated with actual or perceived HIV status,” Judge Riley wrote in her blog.

One of the purposes of this particular trip is to talk with Open Society Initiative for Eastern Africa about a grant they gave to LACE to expand the program and potentially provide resources for paralegals to do outreach work with villages.

Judge Riley also plans to meet with other lawyers and judges and to visit an orphanage to share information about what the clinic has to offer.

She also told Indiana Lawyer she is hoping to work out some of the details for a delegation of Indiana judges, lawyers, and other supporters to visit the clinic.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. Well, maybe it's because they are unelected, and, they have a tendency to strike down laws by elected officials from all over the country. When you have been taught that "Democracy" is something almost sacred, then, you will have a tendency to frown on such imperious conduct. Lawyers get acculturated in law school into thinking that this is the very essence of high minded government, but to people who are more heavily than King George ever did, they may not like it. Thanks for the information.

  2. I pd for a bankruptcy years ago with Mr Stiles and just this week received a garnishment from my pay! He never filed it even though he told me he would! Don't let this guy practice law ever again!!!

  3. Excellent initiative on the part of the AG. Thankfully someone takes action against predators taking advantage of people who have already been through the wringer. Well done!

  4. Conour will never turn these funds over to his defrauded clients. He tearfully told the court, and his daughters dutifully pledged in interviews, that his first priority is to repay every dime of the money he stole from his clients. Judge Young bought it, much to the chagrin of Conour’s victims. Why would Conour need the $2,262 anyway? Taxpayers are now supporting him, paying for his housing, utilities, food, healthcare, and clothing. If Conour puts the money anywhere but in the restitution fund, he’s proved, once again, what a con artist he continues to be and that he has never had any intention of repaying his clients. Judge Young will be proven wrong... again; Conour has no remorse and the Judge is one of the many conned.

  5. Pass Legislation to require guilty defendants to pay for the costs of lab work, etc as part of court costs...

ADVERTISEMENT