Snowed in - good or good grief?

February 3, 2011
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The meteorologists on TV were right this time – the storm that just hit Indiana was a big one. I heard “catastrophic” mentioned a few times before it hit. I wouldn’t go that far, but the fact that businesses shut down early and the Indiana appellate courts and General Assembly closed is telling.

I’ve worked for Indiana Lawyer for nearly five years and cannot remember the Supreme Court, Court of Appeals, and Tax Court being closed because of the weather. Neither can my co-workers who have worked here for several more years before I started. Nor can we recall the General Assembly shutting down because of the weather in any recent years.

It’s been two days since the ice hit in central Indiana and many parking lots and side roads are still like ice rinks.

It takes a pretty significant storm to shut down businesses and government, but this one did it. Was your office or law firm closed because of the weather? Does your office have a plan in place for these types of weather issues? Are people going to be referring to the ice storm of 2011 the way some people recall the blizzard of ‘78?

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. Hail to our Constitutional Law Expert in the Executive Office! “What you’re not paying attention to is the fact that I just took an action to change the law,” Obama said.

  2. What is this, the Ind Supreme Court thinking that there is a separation of powers and limited enumerated powers as delegated by a dusty old document? Such eighteen century thinking, so rare and unwanted by the elites in this modern age. Dictate to us, dictate over us, the massess are chanting! George Soros agrees. Time to change with times Ind Supreme Court, says all President Snows. Rule by executive decree is the new black.

  3. I made the same argument before a commission of the Indiana Supreme Court and then to the fedeal district and federal appellate courts. Fell flat. So very glad to read that some judges still beleive that evidentiary foundations matter.

  4. KUDOS to the Indiana Supreme Court for realizing that some bureacracies need to go to the stake. Recall what RWR said: "No government ever voluntarily reduces itself in size. Government programs, once launched, never disappear. Actually, a government bureau is the nearest thing to eternal life we'll ever see on this earth!" NOW ... what next to this rare and inspiring chopping block? Well, the Commission on Gender and Race (but not religion!?!) is way overdue. And some other Board's could be cut with a positive for State and the reputation of the Indiana judiciary.

  5. During a visit where an informant with police wears audio and video, does the video necessary have to show hand to hand transaction of money and narcotics?

ADVERTISEMENT