Recent law school grads make less money

July 11, 2011
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Being a recent law school graduate right now is tough. Not only are graduates struggling to find jobs, those that become employed are making less than those who graduated in 2009.

The National Association for Law Placement reported last week that the median starting salary for 2010 graduates is 13 percent less than the median starting salary for 2009 grads. The mean salary fell 10 percent as compared to 2009.

Not only is the class of 2010 being paid less, but graduates are having more trouble than their 2009 counterparts in finding work at law firms. NALP says nearly 51 percent of recent grads have gotten a job in a law firm; nearly 56 percent of 2009 graduates landed at law firms. Just below 70 percent of employed grads found a job that required passing the bar.

The organization goes on to break down the class of 2010’s employment numbers, looking at part-time and temporary jobs. NALP notes that of the employed graduates, 22 percent were looking for a different job, about the same as the class of 1994, which also faced a tough job market.

If you graduated in 2010 from law school, do you agree with this report? Does this information worry you if you just graduated from law school in 2011?

ADVERTISEMENT
  • Please Give Credit Where Credit Due
    This report raises a troubling point. I think it's hard for anyone to look at the recent marketplace data (including this study) and not think, "Why aren't we producing enough new law school graduates?"

    Fortunately here in Indiana we can be proud of Indiana Tech's role in working to fix the lawyer-shortage. I hope that socially-aware schools nationwide will follow Indiana Tech's lead. With any luck, in 3-5 years the universities in this country can make real progress towards catching up with demand for qualified candidates to fill high-paying legal jobs.

    (http://abovethelaw.com/2011/05/indiana-tech-moves-forward-with-new-law-school-plans-can-nobody-stop-them/ ; http://www.indianatech.edu/Academics/Pages/law.aspx).
  • Brain Drain
    Not worried a bit because I accepted an offer out East several months before graduation. There are plenty of law firm and government jobs out there, just not in the Hoosier state. I'm more than happy to take my 20 years of Indiana public education and escape the backward politics of the General Assembly (you "accidentally" eliminated a government agency? really?) to be around other like-minded, non-racist, non-bigoted, cultured, and educated people. Thanks for the in-state tuition...I'm out.
  • at least they arent bankers
    Wow a 20% drop in salaries? Thats a big cut year over year.

    Hey Brain Drain-- dont let the door hit ya in the backside on your way out.

    Anynow-- for many decades we have observed a lot of people getting law degrees have no intention of practicing law. Maybe the problem is not too many lawyers overall, but too many law degreed individuals drooling over the prospect of joining the political oligarchy, for which law degrees have become prerequisite.

    Well at least they didnt turn out to be bankers. LOL

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. All the lawyers involved in this don't add up to a hill of beans; mostly yes-men punching their tickets for future advancement. REMF types. Window dressing. Who in this mess was a real hero? the whistleblower that let the public know about the torture, whom the US sent to Jail. John Kyriakou. http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/26/us/ex-officer-for-cia-is-sentenced-in-leak-case.html?_r=0 Now, considering that Torture is Illegal, considering that during Vietnam a soldier was court-martialed and imprisoned for waterboarding, why has the whistleblower gone to jail but none of the torturers have been held to account? It's amazing that Uncle Sam's sunk lower than Vietnam. But that's where we're at. An even more unjust and pointless war conducted in an even more bogus manner. this from npr: "On Jan. 21, 1968, The Washington Post ran a front-page photo of a U.S. soldier supervising the waterboarding of a captured North Vietnamese soldier. The caption said the technique induced "a flooding sense of suffocation and drowning, meant to make him talk." The picture led to an Army investigation and, two months later, the court martial of the soldier." Today, the US itself has become lawless.

  2. "Brain Damage" alright.... The lunatic is on the grass/ The lunatic is on the grass/ Remembering games and daisy chains and laughs/ Got to keep the loonies on the path.... The lunatic is in the hall/ The lunatics are in my hall/ The paper holds their folded faces to the floor/ And every day the paper boy brings more/ And if the dam breaks open many years too soon/ And if there is no room upon the hill/ And if your head explodes with dark forbodings too/ I'll see you on the dark side of the moon!!!

  3. It is amazing how selectively courts can read cases and how two very similar factpatterns can result in quite different renderings. I cited this very same argument in Brown v. Bowman, lost. I guess it is panel, panel, panel when one is on appeal. Sad thing is, I had Sykes. Same argument, she went the opposite. Her Rooker-Feldman jurisprudence is now decidedly unintelligible.

  4. November, 2014, I was charged with OWI/Endangering a person. I was not given a Breathalyzer test and the arresting officer did not believe that alcohol was in any way involved. I was self-overmedicated with prescription medications. I was taken to local hospital for blood draw to be sent to State Tox Lab. My attorney gave me a cookie-cutter plea which amounts to an ALCOHOL-related charge. Totally unacceptable!! HOW can I get my TOX report from the state lab???

  5. My mother got temporary guardianship of my children in 2012. my husband and I got divorced 2015 the judge ordered me to have full custody of all my children. Does this mean the temporary guardianship is over? I'm confused because my divorce papers say I have custody and he gets visits and i get to claim the kids every year on my taxes. So just wondered since I have in black and white that I have custody if I can go get my kids from my moms and not go to jail?

ADVERTISEMENT