Recent law school grads make less money

July 11, 2011
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Being a recent law school graduate right now is tough. Not only are graduates struggling to find jobs, those that become employed are making less than those who graduated in 2009.

The National Association for Law Placement reported last week that the median starting salary for 2010 graduates is 13 percent less than the median starting salary for 2009 grads. The mean salary fell 10 percent as compared to 2009.

Not only is the class of 2010 being paid less, but graduates are having more trouble than their 2009 counterparts in finding work at law firms. NALP says nearly 51 percent of recent grads have gotten a job in a law firm; nearly 56 percent of 2009 graduates landed at law firms. Just below 70 percent of employed grads found a job that required passing the bar.

The organization goes on to break down the class of 2010’s employment numbers, looking at part-time and temporary jobs. NALP notes that of the employed graduates, 22 percent were looking for a different job, about the same as the class of 1994, which also faced a tough job market.

If you graduated in 2010 from law school, do you agree with this report? Does this information worry you if you just graduated from law school in 2011?

ADVERTISEMENT
  • Please Give Credit Where Credit Due
    This report raises a troubling point. I think it's hard for anyone to look at the recent marketplace data (including this study) and not think, "Why aren't we producing enough new law school graduates?"

    Fortunately here in Indiana we can be proud of Indiana Tech's role in working to fix the lawyer-shortage. I hope that socially-aware schools nationwide will follow Indiana Tech's lead. With any luck, in 3-5 years the universities in this country can make real progress towards catching up with demand for qualified candidates to fill high-paying legal jobs.

    (http://abovethelaw.com/2011/05/indiana-tech-moves-forward-with-new-law-school-plans-can-nobody-stop-them/ ; http://www.indianatech.edu/Academics/Pages/law.aspx).
  • Brain Drain
    Not worried a bit because I accepted an offer out East several months before graduation. There are plenty of law firm and government jobs out there, just not in the Hoosier state. I'm more than happy to take my 20 years of Indiana public education and escape the backward politics of the General Assembly (you "accidentally" eliminated a government agency? really?) to be around other like-minded, non-racist, non-bigoted, cultured, and educated people. Thanks for the in-state tuition...I'm out.
  • at least they arent bankers
    Wow a 20% drop in salaries? Thats a big cut year over year.

    Hey Brain Drain-- dont let the door hit ya in the backside on your way out.

    Anynow-- for many decades we have observed a lot of people getting law degrees have no intention of practicing law. Maybe the problem is not too many lawyers overall, but too many law degreed individuals drooling over the prospect of joining the political oligarchy, for which law degrees have become prerequisite.

    Well at least they didnt turn out to be bankers. LOL

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. The practitioners and judges who hail E-filing as the Saviour of the West need to contain their respective excitements. E-filing is federal court requires the practitioner to cram his motion practice into pigeonholes created by IT people. Compound motions or those seeking alternative relief are effectively barred, unless the practitioner wants to receive a tart note from some functionary admonishing about the "problem". E-filing is just another method by which courts and judges transfer their burden to practitioners, who are the really the only powerless components of the system. Of COURSE it is easier for the court to require all of its imput to conform to certain formats, but this imposition does NOT improve the quality of the practice of law and does NOT improve the ability of the practitioner to advocate for his client or to fashion pleadings that exactly conform to his client's best interests. And we should be very wary of the disingenuous pablum about the costs. The courts will find a way to stick it to the practitioner. Lake County is a VERY good example of this rapaciousness. Any one who does not believe this is invited to review the various special fees that system imposes upon practitioners- as practitioners- and upon each case ON TOP of the court costs normal in every case manually filed. Jurisprudence according to Aldous Huxley.

  2. Any attorneys who practice in federal court should be able to say the same as I can ... efiling is great. I have been doing it in fed court since it started way back. Pacer has its drawbacks, but the ability to hit an e-docket and pull up anything and everything onscreen is a huge plus for a litigator, eps the sole practitioner, who lacks a filing clerk and the paralegal support of large firms. Were I an Indiana attorney I would welcome this great step forward.

  3. Can we get full disclosure on lobbyist's payments to legislatures such as Mr Buck? AS long as there are idiots that are disrespectful of neighbors and intent on shooting fireworks every night, some kind of regulations are needed.

  4. I am the mother of the child in this case. My silence on the matter was due to the fact that I filed, both in Illinois and Indiana, child support cases. I even filed supporting documentation with the Indiana family law court. Not sure whether this information was provided to the court of appeals or not. Wish the case was done before moving to Indiana, because no matter what, there is NO WAY the state of Illinois would have allowed an appeal on a child support case!

  5. "No one is safe when the Legislature is in session."

ADVERTISEMENT