Wellness while you work

November 9, 2011
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

What’s the best way to fit working out into your workday? Work out while you work.

Personal fitness and wellness for lawyers is getting a big push from the new Indiana State Bar Association President C. Erik Chickedantz. Chickedantz has created a wellness committee and is encouraging those in the legal community to be proactive when it comes to their health. You can read more about Chickedantz and his wellness initiative in the latest issue of Indiana Lawyer.

Reporter Jenny Montgomery spoke to several attorneys, as well as a professor at Indiana University's School of Medicine, to get tips for working out and eating healthy and to see how busy lawyers fit working out into their schedules. Just as this issue of the newspaper was getting ready to be published, I received an email about a treadmill desk.

If you haven’t seen one before, the name says it all – it’s a desk placed over a treadmill. Based on the picture in the email, it doesn’t seem like anything special and looks like a U-shaped folding table. But it got me thinking – who would use it? Can you really type a brief or do legal research while walking or running on the treadmill? If you really were working out hard, how many showers would you have to take in a day? Can you imagine a judge walking on a treadmill behind the bench during trial?

Has anyone else seen treadmill desks, or better yet, has anyone ever used it? If I had my own office with a door, I could see possibly using it. But could you imagine if you had five or 10 of these going at the same time in one workspace? I think it would be distracting, but at least the employees would be healthier.
 

ADVERTISEMENT
  • Desks
    The treadmill desk isn't designed to have people running full speed while working. Instead, it promotes walking at a very slow pace while you work. By the end of the day, you've walked a couple of miles (or more). You (probably) don't break a sweat, but it keeps the heart working because merely standing up increases your pulse substantially. The slight walk just keeps you going. All-in-all, a pretty effective way to workout at work, assuming you can get your firm to put one in your office.
  • Treadmill Desks for Attorneys
    Hi Jennifer,

    It might interest you to know that attorneys make up the single largest profession of TrekDesk treadmill desk users. We are the manufacturers of the TrekDesk and attorneys seemed to grasp the concept of walking and working quicker than anyone. Perhaps this is because they are more independent in thinking by nature and educated on a wider berth of topics than many occupations. We have videos featuring attorneys on our website along with news write ups. Should you want to do a more in-depth story, please contact us. By the way, you do not sweat walking slowly with a treadmill desk and cognitive abilities and productivity are actually enhanced. We can fill you in on all of the studies if you are interested. Thanks for spreading the word. America needs to get moving again.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. Indiana's seatbelt law is not punishable as a crime. It is an infraction. Apparently some of our Circuit judges have deemed settled law inapplicable if it fails to fit their litmus test of political correctness. Extrapolating to redefine terms of behavior in a violation of immigration law to the entire body of criminal law leaves a smorgasbord of opportunity for judicial mischief.

  2. I wonder if $10 diversions for failure to wear seat belts are considered moral turpitude in federal immigration law like they are under Indiana law? Anyone know?

  3. What a fine article, thank you! I can testify firsthand and by detailed legal reports (at end of this note) as to the dire consequences of rejecting this truth from the fine article above: "The inclusion and expansion of this right [to jury] in Indiana’s Constitution is a clear reflection of our state’s intention to emphasize the importance of every Hoosier’s right to make their case in front of a jury of their peers." Over $20? Every Hoosier? Well then how about when your very vocation is on the line? How about instead of a jury of peers, one faces a bevy of political appointees, mini-czars, who care less about due process of the law than the real czars did? Instead of trial by jury, trial by ideological ordeal run by Orwellian agents? Well that is built into more than a few administrative law committees of the Ind S.Ct., and it is now being weaponized, as is revealed in articles posted at this ezine, to root out post moderns heresies like refusal to stand and pledge allegiance to all things politically correct. My career was burned at the stake for not so saluting, but I think I was just one of the early logs. Due, at least in part, to the removal of the jury from bar admission and bar discipline cases, many more fires will soon be lit. Perhaps one awaits you, dear heretic? Oh, at that Ind. article 12 plank about a remedy at law for every damage done ... ah, well, the founders evidently meant only for those damages done not by the government itself, rabid statists that they were. (Yes, that was sarcasm.) My written reports available here: Denied petition for cert (this time around): http://tinyurl.com/zdmawmw Denied petition for cert (from the 2009 denial and five year banishment): http://tinyurl.com/zcypybh Related, not written by me: Amicus brief: http://tinyurl.com/hvh7qgp

  4. Justice has finally been served. So glad that Dr. Ley can finally sleep peacefully at night knowing the truth has finally come to the surface.

  5. While this right is guaranteed by our Constitution, it has in recent years been hampered by insurance companies, i.e.; the practice of the plaintiff's own insurance company intervening in an action and filing a lien against any proceeds paid to their insured. In essence, causing an additional financial hurdle for a plaintiff to overcome at trial in terms of overall award. In a very real sense an injured party in exercise of their right to trial by jury may be the only party in a cause that would end up with zero compensation.

ADVERTISEMENT