The short session begins

January 4, 2012
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The Indiana General Assembly is back in session. This year is a short session, so bills will move fast or die quickly. The Republicans will be pushing for right-to-work legislation. There are three bills filed in the House and one in the Senate on this topic. This issue caused numerous House Democrats to leave Indiana for several weeks last session to prevent the issue from passing here. Expect heated debates and throngs of people to gather at the Statehouse in support or against the legislation.

With the Super Bowl coming to Indianapolis in February, the Office of the Indiana Attorney General has made a push to pass a law to address human trafficking. The Super Bowl is supposedly a big draw for human traffickers.

There are bills addressing common topics each year - the courts, voting, sentencing, drugs, workplace issues, taxes, etc. But then there are those bills that leave you wondering if the legislator doesn’t have more pressing issues to address for his or her constituents.

Exhibit A: trying to regulate how someone sings the National Anthem at public schools. If someone wants to sing the National Anthem before a high school football game, he or she will have to enter into an agreement with the school that the singer will perform the National Anthem to certain standards – although the bill doesn’t explain what those standards are. They’ll be determined later. But if the singer doesn’t meet those standards, he or she will be fined $25. Schools also have to record every performance and keep them for two years.

Exhibit B: abolishing high school class basketball. Maybe it’s nostalgia for a story like “Hoosiers,” but this has been a point of contention with many Indiana residents since basketball was divided into classes in the late 1990s – like how most other high school sports are. For some reason, the outcry only seems to be with basketball.

Exhibit C: Making April 19 “Patriots’ Day.” The governor will issue a proclamation each year saying April 19 is Patriots’ Day and everyone should honor patriots. The bill leaves out whether we’ll get a three-day weekend out of it.

A complete list of bills filed to date is posted on the General Assembly’s website.
 

ADVERTISEMENT
  • Class Basketball
    Abolishing class basketball is the most important issue facing the State. Respectfully, if you don't understand that, you must not be from Indiana.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. The practitioners and judges who hail E-filing as the Saviour of the West need to contain their respective excitements. E-filing is federal court requires the practitioner to cram his motion practice into pigeonholes created by IT people. Compound motions or those seeking alternative relief are effectively barred, unless the practitioner wants to receive a tart note from some functionary admonishing about the "problem". E-filing is just another method by which courts and judges transfer their burden to practitioners, who are the really the only powerless components of the system. Of COURSE it is easier for the court to require all of its imput to conform to certain formats, but this imposition does NOT improve the quality of the practice of law and does NOT improve the ability of the practitioner to advocate for his client or to fashion pleadings that exactly conform to his client's best interests. And we should be very wary of the disingenuous pablum about the costs. The courts will find a way to stick it to the practitioner. Lake County is a VERY good example of this rapaciousness. Any one who does not believe this is invited to review the various special fees that system imposes upon practitioners- as practitioners- and upon each case ON TOP of the court costs normal in every case manually filed. Jurisprudence according to Aldous Huxley.

  2. Any attorneys who practice in federal court should be able to say the same as I can ... efiling is great. I have been doing it in fed court since it started way back. Pacer has its drawbacks, but the ability to hit an e-docket and pull up anything and everything onscreen is a huge plus for a litigator, eps the sole practitioner, who lacks a filing clerk and the paralegal support of large firms. Were I an Indiana attorney I would welcome this great step forward.

  3. Can we get full disclosure on lobbyist's payments to legislatures such as Mr Buck? AS long as there are idiots that are disrespectful of neighbors and intent on shooting fireworks every night, some kind of regulations are needed.

  4. I am the mother of the child in this case. My silence on the matter was due to the fact that I filed, both in Illinois and Indiana, child support cases. I even filed supporting documentation with the Indiana family law court. Not sure whether this information was provided to the court of appeals or not. Wish the case was done before moving to Indiana, because no matter what, there is NO WAY the state of Illinois would have allowed an appeal on a child support case!

  5. "No one is safe when the Legislature is in session."

ADVERTISEMENT