The short session begins

January 4, 2012
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The Indiana General Assembly is back in session. This year is a short session, so bills will move fast or die quickly. The Republicans will be pushing for right-to-work legislation. There are three bills filed in the House and one in the Senate on this topic. This issue caused numerous House Democrats to leave Indiana for several weeks last session to prevent the issue from passing here. Expect heated debates and throngs of people to gather at the Statehouse in support or against the legislation.

With the Super Bowl coming to Indianapolis in February, the Office of the Indiana Attorney General has made a push to pass a law to address human trafficking. The Super Bowl is supposedly a big draw for human traffickers.

There are bills addressing common topics each year - the courts, voting, sentencing, drugs, workplace issues, taxes, etc. But then there are those bills that leave you wondering if the legislator doesn’t have more pressing issues to address for his or her constituents.

Exhibit A: trying to regulate how someone sings the National Anthem at public schools. If someone wants to sing the National Anthem before a high school football game, he or she will have to enter into an agreement with the school that the singer will perform the National Anthem to certain standards – although the bill doesn’t explain what those standards are. They’ll be determined later. But if the singer doesn’t meet those standards, he or she will be fined $25. Schools also have to record every performance and keep them for two years.

Exhibit B: abolishing high school class basketball. Maybe it’s nostalgia for a story like “Hoosiers,” but this has been a point of contention with many Indiana residents since basketball was divided into classes in the late 1990s – like how most other high school sports are. For some reason, the outcry only seems to be with basketball.

Exhibit C: Making April 19 “Patriots’ Day.” The governor will issue a proclamation each year saying April 19 is Patriots’ Day and everyone should honor patriots. The bill leaves out whether we’ll get a three-day weekend out of it.

A complete list of bills filed to date is posted on the General Assembly’s website.
 

ADVERTISEMENT
  • Class Basketball
    Abolishing class basketball is the most important issue facing the State. Respectfully, if you don't understand that, you must not be from Indiana.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. I enrolled America's 1st tax-free Health Savings Account (HSA) so you can trust me. I bet 1/3 of my clients were lawyers because they love tax-free deposits, growth and withdrawals or total tax freedom. Most of the time (always) these clients are uninformed about insurance law. Employer-based health insurance is simple if you read the policy. It says, Employers (lawyers) and employees who are working 30-hours-per-week are ELIGIBLE for insurance. Then I show the lawyer the TERMINATION clause which states: When you are no longer ELIGIBLE! Then I ask a closing question (sales term) to the lawyer which is, "If you have a stroke or cancer and become too sick to work can you keep your health insurance?" If the lawyer had dependent children they needed a "Dependent Conversion Privilege" in case their child got sick or hurt which the lawyers never had. Lawyers are pretty easy sales. Save premium, eliminate taxes and build wealth!

  2. Ok, so cheap laughs made about the Christian Right. hardiharhar ... All kidding aside, it is Mohammad's followers who you should be seeking divine protection from. Allahu Akbar But progressives are in denial about that, even as Europe crumbles.

  3. Father's rights? What about a mothers rights? A child's rights? Taking a child from the custody of the mother for political reasons! A miscarriage of justice! What about the welfare of the child? Has anyone considered parent alienation, the father can't erase the mother from the child's life. This child loves the mother and the home in Wisconsin, friends, school and family. It is apparent the father hates his ex-wife more than he loves his child! I hope there will be a Guardian Ad Litem, who will spend time with and get to know the child, BEFORE being brainwashed by the father. This is not just a child! A little person with rights and real needs, a stable home and a parent that cares enough to let this child at least finish the school year, where she is happy and comfortable! Where is the justice?

  4. "The commission will review applications and interview qualified candidates in March and April." Riiiiiight. Would that be the same vaulted process that brought us this result done by "qualified candidates"? http://www.theindianalawyer.com/justices-deny-transfer-to-child-custody-case/PARAMS/article/42774 Perhaps a lottery system more like the draft would be better? And let us not limit it to Indiana attorneys so as to give the untainted a fighting chance?

  5. Steal a little, and they put you in jail. Steal a lot, and they make you king. Bob Dylan ala Samuel Johnson. I had a very similar experience trying to hold due process trampling bureaucrats responsible under the law. Consider this quote and commentary:"'When the president does it, that means it is not illegal,' [Richard] Nixon told his interviewer. Those words were largely seen by the American public -- which continued to hold the ex-president in low esteem -- as a symbol of his unbowed arrogance. Most citizens still wanted to believe that no American citizen, not even the president, is above the law." BWHaahaaahaaa!!!! http://www.philly.com/philly/blogs/attytood/When-the-president-does-it-that-means-it-is-not-illegal.html

ADVERTISEMENT