Recent Blog Posts

March is the 'divorce' month

February 29, 2012
Comments(0)
Move over January, March is taking over as the month when divorce filings peak.
More

Less lawyers lunching

February 15, 2012
Comments(0)
A recent survey shows attorneys are conducting fewer business lunches. Looks like the “power lunches” aren’t so powerful anymore.
More

Looking at law students' experiences

January 24, 2012
Comments(0)
Law school students aren’t interacting much with international students, something that may hurt them as they prepare for a more internationally diverse environment.
More

'The Puppet's Court'

January 20, 2012
Comments(0)
No cameras in court? No problem! One news station has decided to cover a federal corruption trial using puppets.
More

Class basketball supporters can relax, for now

January 19, 2012
Comments(0)
The Indiana state senator who called for an end to class basketball has called a time out on his legislation.
More

Study tackles transparency of law schools

January 18, 2012
Comments(0)
A Tennessee nonprofit is calling out law schools for their lack of accessible information on recent graduates.
More

The short session begins

January 4, 2012
Comment(1)
Indiana’s General Assembly reconvenes Wednesday with legislators looking to tackle human trafficking before the Super Bowl comes to town and address right-to-work legislation.
And as with every session, there are those bills that leave me wondering if our legislators don’t have better things to worry about.
 
More

Dog soothes stressed law students

December 21, 2011
Comment(1)
Therapy dogs aren’t just for sick patients or scared kids.
More

Celebrate your rights

December 15, 2011
Comments(2)
Dec. 15 is Bill of Rights Day. Which of the first 10 amendments is the most important?
More

Ad capitalizes on holiday drinking

December 12, 2011
Comments(0)
Add an Indianapolis attorney to the list of lawyers creatively marketing their services to those who drink too much this time of year.
More

Budget cuts affecting courts

December 1, 2011
Comments(0)
The state of the economy is impacting our access to justice, according to the National Center for State Courts.
More

Lawyer cashes in on Cyber Monday frenzy

November 29, 2011
Comments(0)
How’s this for a Cyber Monday promotion: one attorney offered DUI defense for just $99.
More

Commission irons out details in half-day meeting

November 18, 2011
Comments(0)
The Legislature’s Criminal Code Evaluation Commission met Thursday. If you missed the three-and-a-half hour meeting, read on to find out what happened.
More

Judge is a fan of Johnny Carson

November 16, 2011
Comments(0)
I am about to show my age: I had to do a Google search to find out who Carnac is.
More

Wellness while you work

November 9, 2011
Comments(2)
What’s the best way to fit working out into your workday? Work out while you work.
More

Is law school still attractive?

November 1, 2011
Comments(3)
Practicing attorneys: if someone asked you whether he or she should go to law school, what would you say?
More

Putting divorce on pause

October 28, 2011
Comments(0)
A recent op-ed piece in a newspaper suggests people with small children should have to wait a year to get divorced.
More

Take time to help others

October 27, 2011
Comments(0)
Did you know it’s National Pro Bono Week? I didn’t, until I randomly came across the information.
More

Using social media to boost business

October 25, 2011
Comments(2)
Do you see any benefits for your practice in using Twitter, Facebook or other social media outlets?
 
More

Learning about law schools

October 14, 2011
Comments(0)
Indiana University’s “Law Day” will be the largest law fair in the country.
More

Save money, don't prosecute domestic violence cases

October 10, 2011
Comments(0)
One city is considering repealing a part of its city code that bans domestic battery because it doesn’t have the resources to prosecute those cases.
More

Minorities and Indiana firms

October 3, 2011
Comments(2)
A diversity database recently released shows some progress for women and minorities at Indianapolis’ largest firms.
More

Is law school a waste of time?

September 28, 2011
Comment(1)
One columnist claims that a law degree really isn’t useful.
More

Indiana (almost) has newest crop of lawyers

September 23, 2011
Comments(0)
More than 400 people passed the July 2011 bar exam, including an Indiana legislator.
More

Pressure for law school to cook the books?

September 21, 2011
Comments(0)
Law schools are trying to stand out and make themselves attractive to students (and U.S. News and World Report), but at least one school may have gone too far.
More

Page  << 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 >> pager
ADVERTISEMENT
Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. Falk said “At this point, at this minute, we’ll savor this particular victory.” “It certainly is a historic week on this front,” Cockrum said. “What a delight ... “Happy Independence Day to the women of the state of Indiana,” WOW. So we broke with England for the right to "off" our preborn progeny at will, and allow the processing plant doing the dirty deeds (dirt cheap) to profit on the marketing of those "products of conception." I was completely maleducated on our nation's founding, it would seem. (But I know the ACLU is hard at work to remedy that, too.)

  2. congratulations on such balanced journalism; I also love how fetus disposal affects women's health protection, as covered by Roe...

  3. It truly sickens me every time a case is compared to mine. The Indiana Supreme Court upheld my convictions based on a finding of “hidden threats.” The term “hidden threat” never appeared until the opinion in Brewington so I had no way of knowing I was on trial for making hidden threats because Dearborn County Prosecutor F Aaron Negangard argued the First Amendment didn't protect lies. Negangard convened a grand jury to investigate me for making “over the top” and “unsubstantiated” statements about court officials, not hidden threats of violence. My indictments and convictions were so vague, the Indiana Court of Appeals made no mention of hidden threats when they upheld my convictions. Despite my public defender’s closing arguments stating he was unsure of exactly what conduct the prosecution deemed to be unlawful, Rush found that my lawyer’s trial strategy waived my right to the fundamental error of being tried for criminal defamation because my lawyer employed a strategy that attempted to take advantage of Negangard's unconstitutional criminal defamation prosecution against me. Rush’s opinion stated the prosecution argued two grounds for conviction one constitutional and one not, however the constitutional true threat “argument” consistently of only a blanket reading of subsection 1 of the intimidation statute during closing arguments, making it impossible to build any kind of defense. Of course intent was impossible for my attorney to argue because my attorney, Rush County Chief Public Defender Bryan Barrett refused to meet with me prior to trial. The record is littered with examples of where I made my concerns known to the trial judge that I didn’t know the charges against me, I did not have access to evidence, all while my public defender refused to meet with me. Special Judge Brian Hill, from Rush Superior Court, refused to address the issue with my public defender and marched me to trial without access to evidence or an understanding of the indictments against me. Just recently the Indiana Public Access Counselor found that four over four years Judge Hill has erroneously denied access to the grand jury audio from my case, the most likely reason being the transcription of the grand jury proceedings omitted portions of the official audio record. The bottom line is any intimidation case involves an action or statement that is debatably a threat of physical violence. There were no such statements in my case. The Indiana Supreme Court took partial statements I made over a period of 41 months and literally connected them with dots… to give the appearance that the statements were made within the same timeframe and then claimed a person similarly situated would find the statements intimidating while intentionally leaving out surrounding contextual factors. Even holding the similarly situated test was to be used in my case, the prosecution argued that the only intent of my public writings was to subject the “victims” to ridicule and hatred so a similarly situated jury instruction wouldn't even have applied in my case. Chief Justice Rush wrote the opinion while Rush continued to sit on a committee with one of the alleged victims in my trial and one of the judges in my divorce, just as she'd done for the previous 7+ years. All of this information, including the recent PAC opinion against the Dearborn Superior Court II can be found on my blog www.danbrewington.blogspot.com.

  4. On a related note, I offered the ICLU my cases against the BLE repeatedly, and sought their amici aid repeatedly as well. Crickets. Usually not even a response. I am guessing they do not do allegations of anti-Christian bias? No matter how glaring? I have posted on other links the amicus brief that did get filed (search this ezine, e.g., Kansas attorney), read the Thomas More Society brief to note what the ACLU ran from like vampires from garlic. An Examiner pledged to advance diversity and inclusion came right out on the record and demanded that I choose Man's law or God's law. I wonder, had I been asked to swear off Allah ... what result then, ICLU? Had I been found of bad character and fitness for advocating sexual deviance, what result then ICLU? Had I been lifetime banned for posting left of center statements denigrating the US Constitution, what result ICLU? Hey, we all know don't we? Rather Biased.

  5. It was mentioned in the article that there have been numerous CLE events to train attorneys on e-filing. I would like someone to provide a list of those events, because I have not seen any such events in east central Indiana, and since Hamilton County is one of the counties where e-filing is mandatory, one would expect some instruction in this area. Come on, people, give some instruction, not just applause!

ADVERTISEMENT