ILNews

First interviews done for COA opening

Michael W. Hoskins
January 1, 2007
Keywords
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
They came to the capitol building in Indianapolis from across the state, facing a barrage of questions about why they want to be an appellate court judge.

Seven will return for a second round next month.

The Judicial Nominating Commission conducted its first round of interviews Tuesday for a seat on the state's second highest appeals court, an opening that will be created by Judge John T. Sharpnack's retirement in May 2008.

The seven semi-finalists, selected after the daylong session of interviews and closed-door deliberations lasting about an hour, are Dubois Superior Judge Elaine B. Brown, Morgan Superior Judge Jane Spencer Craney, Wayne Superior Judge P. Thomas Snow, Dearborn Superior Judge G. Michael Witte, Sen. Brent E. Steele of Bedford firm Steele & Steele, Leslie C. Shively of Shively & Associates in Evansville, and Stephen J. Johnson, executive director of the Indiana Prosecuting Attorneys Council.

Those who didn't make the first cut included Greenwood attorney William Barrett, Morgan Superior Judge Christopher Burnham, Henry County Prosecutor Kit C. Dean Crane, New Albany attorney Richard Fox, Vincennes attorney Jeffrey Kolb, Boone Superior Judge Rebecca McClure, Vanderburgh County deputy prosecutor Daniel Miller, and Mitchell attorney William Mullis.

"We have one of the best fields of candidates I can remember," Chief Justice Randall T. Shepard, who chairs the commission, said after the interviews. "We just don't have enough room for them all."

During interviews, commissioners asked typical questions, including why they want to be on the court, how applicants thought their background would influence or complement their work on the court, what particular areas of law they might like to see addressed, and their views about balancing quantity and quality in a time of increasing caseloads. Commissioners focused on specific points of interviewees' backgrounds, such as cases they've handled to their particular interests inside and outside the law.

Three applicants - Dean, Mullis, and Judge Burnham spent time in their interviews talking about their military experience and how it compliments their legal experience and would do the same if they were selected for the appellate seat.

Judge Burnham also spoke about his interest in technology and involvement with the Judicial Technology and Automation Committee since its inception. He went up against one of his local colleagues, Judge Craney, who he had also worked under years ago - she was Morgan County Prosecutor and he was a deputy prosecutor during the 1980s.

Boone Superior Judge Rebecca S. McClure told the commission about three cases she felt were important and demonstrated her analytical skills. One dealt with home-schooled students who wanted to take one course at a local school. Another was a case involving golf carts being classified as motor vehicles, and the third - which she couldn't say much about because it's ongoing - involves former Indianapolis Colts quarterback Jack Trudeau, who is charged with contributing to the delinquency of a minor and aiding, inducing, or causing illegal possession or consumption of alcohol by a minor. All three cases present issues of first impression in Indiana, she said.

Judge Witte from Dearborn County sees the role of an appellate judge evolving from its traditional functions, noting that a jurist must be more of a leader in the judicial branch these days rather than just issuing decisions.

When Wayne Superior Judge Snow was interviewing, Chief Justice Shepard noted how he was impressed with what people said about the judge in how well he treats lawyers and litigants, and the chief justice described that as assuring.

Later, the chief justice also said he was impressed with the connection Johnson has with the different branches of the government and the legal community as the head of the Indiana Prosecuting Attorneys Council.

Dubois Superior Judge Brown told commissioners she brought a unique perspective to the applicant field. She's been a judge for 15 years but is only 3 ½ years removed from active law practice because her judicial terms have not been concurrent. That has given her insight into both sides of the bench and helps her see firsthand how settlements, expedited hearings, jurist approachability, and overall court efficiency really help the practicing bar.

Judge Brown, who was assigned to preside over a Clark County case involving judicial mandates, said she hopes the appellate opportunity could help her become a "true student of the law."

Trial judges, prosecutors, and trial lawyers all want one of their own on the appellate court, according to one of the commissioners, who asked applicants what they thought about that sentiment and who they think is the best to serve on the court.

"You shouldn't be looking for someone to fit in one of those categories," Judge McClure said. "You want a person who will work hard and loves the law, and will represent the masses."

Now that the seven-member commission has selected semi-finalists, those chosen will return for second interviews scheduled for Dec. 12. Before that second round, the commission will decide a question for applicants to consider and focus their answers on.

Three finalists' names will be given to Gov. Mitch Daniels to make the final decision, which by law must happen within 60 days of receiving the commission's nominations.
ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Indiana's seatbelt law is not punishable as a crime. It is an infraction. Apparently some of our Circuit judges have deemed settled law inapplicable if it fails to fit their litmus test of political correctness. Extrapolating to redefine terms of behavior in a violation of immigration law to the entire body of criminal law leaves a smorgasbord of opportunity for judicial mischief.

  2. I wonder if $10 diversions for failure to wear seat belts are considered moral turpitude in federal immigration law like they are under Indiana law? Anyone know?

  3. What a fine article, thank you! I can testify firsthand and by detailed legal reports (at end of this note) as to the dire consequences of rejecting this truth from the fine article above: "The inclusion and expansion of this right [to jury] in Indiana’s Constitution is a clear reflection of our state’s intention to emphasize the importance of every Hoosier’s right to make their case in front of a jury of their peers." Over $20? Every Hoosier? Well then how about when your very vocation is on the line? How about instead of a jury of peers, one faces a bevy of political appointees, mini-czars, who care less about due process of the law than the real czars did? Instead of trial by jury, trial by ideological ordeal run by Orwellian agents? Well that is built into more than a few administrative law committees of the Ind S.Ct., and it is now being weaponized, as is revealed in articles posted at this ezine, to root out post moderns heresies like refusal to stand and pledge allegiance to all things politically correct. My career was burned at the stake for not so saluting, but I think I was just one of the early logs. Due, at least in part, to the removal of the jury from bar admission and bar discipline cases, many more fires will soon be lit. Perhaps one awaits you, dear heretic? Oh, at that Ind. article 12 plank about a remedy at law for every damage done ... ah, well, the founders evidently meant only for those damages done not by the government itself, rabid statists that they were. (Yes, that was sarcasm.) My written reports available here: Denied petition for cert (this time around): http://tinyurl.com/zdmawmw Denied petition for cert (from the 2009 denial and five year banishment): http://tinyurl.com/zcypybh Related, not written by me: Amicus brief: http://tinyurl.com/hvh7qgp

  4. Justice has finally been served. So glad that Dr. Ley can finally sleep peacefully at night knowing the truth has finally come to the surface.

  5. While this right is guaranteed by our Constitution, it has in recent years been hampered by insurance companies, i.e.; the practice of the plaintiff's own insurance company intervening in an action and filing a lien against any proceeds paid to their insured. In essence, causing an additional financial hurdle for a plaintiff to overcome at trial in terms of overall award. In a very real sense an injured party in exercise of their right to trial by jury may be the only party in a cause that would end up with zero compensation.

ADVERTISEMENT