Five Indianapolis attorneys have put their names in the hat for a single opening on the state’s judicial commissions,
which are responsible for deciding whether disciplinary actions should be taken against a jurist and determining who should
be on the state’s appellate courts.
By a Friday deadline, those who’d submitted their names to be considered are:
Jan M. Carroll, a partner at law firm Barnes & Thornburg who was admitted to practice in 1984.
David R. Hennessy, a solo practitioner who sits on the Indiana Public Defender Council’s board of directors and has
been practicing since 1982.
Kathy L. Osborn, a partner at Baker & Daniels who’s been practicing since 2000.
Joel Schumm, an Indianapolis attorney since 1998 and a law professor at Indiana University School of Law – Indianapolis.
William E. Winingham Jr., a name partner at Wilson Kehoe & Winingham who was admitted to practice in Indiana in 1979.
Attorneys in the 19-county Second District will vote on which of those nominees they want to put on the seven-person commission,
which is made up of three lawyers and three non-attorneys and is chaired by the chief justice. Ballots and biographies will
be mailed out by the Indiana Appellate Clerk’s Office on Oct. 12, and attorneys must return the ballots by 4 p.m. Nov.
10. The ballots will be counted at 10 a.m. Nov. 12, according to a clerk’s office notice.
The vacancy for the Judicial Nominating Commission and Indiana Commission on Judicial Qualifications opens up at the end
of the year, once Indianapolis attorney John Trimble fulfills his three-year term on the panel for the Second District. That
district is made up of Adams, Blackford, Carroll, Cass, Clinton, Delaware, Grant, Hamilton, Howard, Huntington, Jay, Madison,
Marion, Miami, Tippecanoe, Tipton, Wabash, Wells, and White counties.
Whoever fills that spot would succeed Trimble for the next three years. In the past three years, the commission has interviewed
applicants and recommended finalists for the Indiana Court of Appeals and most recently for the Indiana Supreme Court, and
in the coming months the members will interview those interested in becoming Indiana’s next Tax Court judge.














Never heard of remand to another state. How often does that happen?
I highly recommend Deanna and her team of professionals that serve the legal community. Great information and many thanks for sharing.
they are pushing these cases against lawyers too far. thought-crime.
vagueness cannot challenged, so let's write all laws vaguely and throw the constitution out the window.Even if the court is operating under a particular law, if they don't it they will change it to their liking. What a joke!!!
Two convictions becomes one conviction with exactly the same sentence, only it is not clear wheter or not that sentence will be 18 months, 120 months or 138 months. Actually if the guns were in a home, whether or not they were his, he is protected under the 2nd amendment. Jurors need to learn the law and the constitution before judging others. The cour5ts need to do this as well.