Flood victims consider suing state, county and South Bend

 Associated Press
September 9, 2016
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Flood victims in the South Bend area are considering filing a lawsuit against the state, county and city.

The South Bend Tribune reports that Edward and Wanda Walton have served the Indiana Department of Transportation, St. Joseph County and the city of South Bend with a "notice of tort claim." The action is legally required step before a person can sue a body of government in Indiana.

The Waltons lost their home and most of its contents during record rainfall Aug. 15.

The notice says residents suffered from the flood because of the governmental entities' negligence in controlling the increased runoff from the recently completed U.S. 31 project.

The notice indicates that their attorney, Charles Rice, might seek class action certification from a judge if he files a lawsuit.

"We are investigating this and served the tort claims notice on the state, county and city," Rice said.

Rice has sent the county a request for public records that includes records related to the Phillips Ditch, a county-maintained drainage ditch that crosses U.S. 31 and runs northwest through the neighborhood, along with records pertaining to surface water runoff into the ditch and impact of the state's realignment project.

In an email to the newspaper, Indiana Department of Transportation spokesman Doug Moats said "it's been documented that the area in southern South Bend, in the region of the new U.S. 31 corridor, has had high water issues for many years when there is a substantial rainfall. This has been occurring since before the new U.S. 31 was constructed."

Moats said they sympathize with everyone who was affected by the flooding and that they are "communicating with St. Joseph County to investigate whether cooperation on this matter could help."


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. I have had an ongoing custody case for 6 yrs. I should have been the sole legal custodial parent but was a victim of a vindictive ex and the system biasedly supported him. He is an alcoholic and doesn't even have a license for two yrs now after his 2nd DUI. Fast frwd 6 yrs later my kids are suffering poor nutritional health, psychological issues, failing in school, have NO MD and the GAL could care less, DCS doesn't care. The child isn't getting his ADHD med he needs and will not succeed in life living this way. NO one will HELP our family.I tried for over 6 yrs. The judge called me an idiot for not knowing how to enter evidence and the last hearing was 8 mths ago. That in itself is unjust! The kids want to be with their Mother! They are being alienated from her and fed lies by their Father! I was hit in a car accident 3 yrs ago and am declared handicapped myself. Poor poor way to treat the indigent in Indiana!

  2. The Indiana DOE released the 2015-2016 school grades in Dec 2016 and my local elementary school is a "C" grade school. Look at the MCCSC boundary maps and how all of the most affluent neighborhoods have the best performance. It is no surprise that obtaining residency in the "A" school boundaries cost 1.5 to 3 times as much. As a parent I should have more options than my "C" school without needing to pay the premium to live in the affluent parts of town. If the charter were authorized by a non-religious school the plaintiffs would still be against it because it would still be taking per-pupil money from them. They are hiding behind the guise of religion as a basis for their argument when this is clearly all about money and nothing else.

  3. This is a horrible headline. The article is about challenging the ability of Grace College to serve as an authorizer. 7 Oaks is not a religiously affiliated school

  4. Congratulations to Judge Carmichael for making it to the final three! She is an outstanding Judge and the people of Indiana will benefit tremendously if/when she is chosen.

  5. The headline change to from "religious" to "religious-affiliated" is still inaccurate and terribly misleading.