ILNews

Foreclosure programs aimed at judges, lawyers

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The Indiana Supreme Court announced today it's partnering with Indiana Legal Services Inc. and the Legal Aid Society of Southwest Ohio to sponsor training for attorneys, judges, and mediators about how to help families facing foreclosure.

Chief Justice Randall T. Shepard recently announced the plan to train more people in the legal community than any other state about how to deal with the foreclosure crisis, including asking attorneys to take these cases pro bono.

The training begins March 6 with a special education program dedicated to mortgage foreclosure issues. This is the first of many specially designed to educate judges and lawyers about new loan-modification programs and mediation options. Indiana trial courts have seen nearly a 50 percent increase in the number of foreclosure cases filed in the past five years, and the Supreme Court wants to assist courts as they deal with the influx of foreclosure cases.

The training, "How do we get out of this mess?" is from 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m. at the Indiana Housing and Community Development Authority, 30 S. Meridian St., 8th Floor, Indianapolis. At this training and others, the Supreme Court will offer scholarships to private attorneys who complete the training and agree to handle one mortgage foreclosure case on a pro bono basis.

Cost to attend is $50 for private attorneys and $15 for non-profit attorneys; 6.5 hours of CLE are pending. Lunch is provided, and attendees are encouraged, but not required, to bring a laptop for the case study.

Online and downloadable registration is available on Indiana Legal Services' Web site. Questions or concerns can be directed to Marcy Wenzler at (812) 339-7668. Information about future programs will be available on the court's Web site.

Look for a story in the March 4-17, 2009, issue of Indiana Lawyer about what Marion County courts are doing to address foreclosures.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. For many years this young man was "family" being my cousin's son. Then he decided to ignore my existence and that of my daughter who was very hurt by his actions after growing up admiring, Jason. Glad he is doing well, as for his opinion, if you care so much you wouldn't ignore the feelings of those who cared so much about you for years, Jason.

  2. Good riddance to this dangerous activist judge

  3. What is the one thing the Hoosier legal status quo hates more than a whistleblower? A lawyer whistleblower taking on the system man to man. That must never be rewarded, must always, always, always be punished, lest the whole rotten tree be felled.

  4. I want to post this to keep this tread alive and hope more of David's former clients might come forward. In my case, this coward of a man represented me from June 2014 for a couple of months before I fired him. I knew something was wrong when he blatantly lied about what he had advised me in my contentious and unfortunate divorce trial. His impact on the proceedings cast a very long shadow and continues to impact me after a lengthy 19 month divorce. I would join a class action suit.

  5. The dispute in LB Indiana regarding lake front property rights is typical of most beach communities along our Great Lakes. Simply put, communication to non owners when visiting the lakefront would be beneficial. The Great Lakes are designated navigational waters (including shorelines). The high-water mark signifies the area one is able to navigate. This means you can walk, run, skip, etc. along the shores. You can't however loiter, camp, sunbath in front of someones property. Informational signs may be helpful to owners and visitors. Our Great Lakes are a treasure that should be enjoyed by all. PS We should all be concerned that the Long Beach, Indiana community is on septic systems.

ADVERTISEMENT