ILNews

Former clerks recall a judge who gave support and kindness

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The Hon. Robert H. Staton achieved many professional milestones in his lengthy career. But after his death on July 18, what people seemed to remember most about him was his enduring positive influence in their lives.

Judge Staton served on the Indiana Court of Appeals for nearly 30 years before retiring in 2000. In that time, he helped shape the careers of the many men and women who clerked for him. Judy Vale Newton was one of those people.
 

staton-judge Staton

“Judge Staton hired his clerks with an eye toward establishing a companionable work environment ... and, indeed, it was,” Newton wrote in an email to Indiana Lawyer. “We law clerks became good friends. Often the judge would call all of us into his office just to talk. Kids, travel, problems, our futures ... he was interested in it all.”

Newton, of the Indianapolis firm Newton Becker Bouwkamp Pendoski, clerked for Judge Staton from 1979 to 1981. She said the judge was “truly a man before his time” in regard to his understanding of family obligations. Judge Staton told her that as long as she kept her production up, during the summer she could work from home several days a week in order to spend time with her two young children.


newton-judy-mug Newton

Linda Hammel, of the Indianapolis firm Yarling & Robinson, clerked for Judge Staton from 1972 to 1976.

“At the time I was his law clerk, I was the only female law clerk on the Court of Appeals,” she said, adding that she met her future husband while clerking.

“Judge Staton married us. We were his first wedding – he was so nervous,” she recalled. “We stayed close over the years, because he was such a big part of starting my career and my family.”

Giving back

In 2005, a group of Judge Staton’s former clerks launched a fundraising campaign with the goal of naming the moot court competition at the Indiana University School of Law – Indianapolis, Judge Staton’s alma mater, in his honor. Leading this effort was attorney Tom Hall of the South Bend Firm Tuesley Hall Konopa, also one of Judge Staton’s former clerks.

“He was a mentor to all of us clerks – he respected us, respected our abilities, and made us better people,” Hall said. “He just did so much for our profession that I felt it very important to recognize him while he was still here.”

Hall, with the help of Hammel and former clerks John Ittenbach and Kevin Knight, reached out to other past clerks, appeals court judges, and friends of Judge Staton, and created an endowed account to allow The Honorable Robert H. Staton Intramural Court Competition to continue in perpetuity.


hall-tom-mug Hall

IU School of Law – Indianapolis Dean Gary Roberts said that in 2007, Judge Staton established a fund to support the Honorable Robert H. Staton Best Brief Scholarship, awarded to a student in the legal analysis, research, and communication class who has written the best brief.

“We were deeply saddened to learn of Judge Staton’s passing,” Roberts said. “He was a great friend of the law school, having served on our alumni board for many years. Not only was he a past president of the board and a past recipient of our Distinguished Alumni Award, he cared deeply about our students.”

Breaking ground

Judge Staton wrote, “The History of Mandatory Continuing Legal Education in Indiana,” featured in the Valparaiso University Law Review in 2006. In that article, he wrote that Indiana State Bar Association president Thomas Scanlon “chose a young, inexperienced lawyer” (Staton) to lead a team in creating a glossy new publication for the ISBA. Under Staton’s leadership, the team published the first edition of Res Gestae in November of 1956, with Staton becoming its first editor.

Judge Staton was also chairman of a task force in 1984 that researched mandatory continuing legal education in 17 other states. The group put together a recommendation that Indiana adopt mandatory CLE requirements, presenting its research for the 1985 spring meeting of the ISBA. The House of Delegates approved the rule as submitted by the task force. Later, the Indiana Supreme Court adopted Rule 29, which calls for mandatory CLE, and the rule became effective on Oct. 1, 1986. Judge Staton became the first chairman of the Indiana Commission for Continuing Legal Education, making Indiana the 18th state to adopt such requirements.

Judge Staton was president of the law school’s alumni association and served on its board of directors from 2004 to 2007. He served on the executive council for IU, representing the law school.

The judge was a prolific writer – he wrote more than 3,000 majority opinions during his time on the appeals court, and he was known for his historical accounts of Indiana’s legal system.

“He was a student of the history of the law, so often you would find in the footnotes in his opinions an explanation of how the law came about … even back to Roman times,” Hammel said.

He also received the title of “life honorary editor” of the Indiana Law Review.

Early career

Judge Staton served in World War II with the 91st Infantry Division of the 5th Army and was attached to the 801 Special Combat Force, which specialized in reconnaissance work behind enemy lines. He achieved the rank of major and was awarded numerous medals, including a Silver Star, two Bronze Stars, and the Distinguished Flying Cross.

After earning his law degree in 1955, he became a deputy prosecuting attorney in Marion County, eventually becoming chief trial deputy prosecutor. He then entered private practice, founding the firm of Staton & Ward.

John Ittenbach became the judge’s first clerk after Judge Staton was elected to the Indiana Court of Appeals in 1970, the last appellate court election before merit-selection began in 1971.

“Being able to finish the last two years of law school while clerking for him was probably the best thing that ever happened to me,” Ittenbach said. In addition to learning about writing persuasively and analytical thinking, Ittenbach, of the firm Ittenbach Johnson Trettin & Koeller, said he learned about the importance of character in the legal profession.

“In my opinion he was a gentleman lawyer – he never said anything disparaging about anybody else,” Ittenbach said. “I consider him a mentor and a model for how lawyers should be. I’ve been practicing law for 37 years now, and I would still go to him for advice occasionally.”

The judge taught his clerks not only how to practice law, Ittebach said, but how to appreciate it.

Judge Staton, who was 86, was preceded in death by his wife, Jane Ellen (Cox) Staton. He is survived by his two daughters who are also attorneys, Jennifer Staton Stoesz (Steven), of Carmel; and Elizabeth Staton Idleman (Scott), of Milwaukee. He has four grandchildren.

Memorial contributions may be made to The Honorable Robert H. Staton Intramural Moot Court Competition at IU School of Law – Indianapolis c/o IU Foundation Showalter House, P.O. Box 500, Bloomington, Ind., 47402; or Carmel Clay Public Library Foundation, 55 4th Ave. S.E., Carmel, Ind., 46032. Funeral services were July 25 at Second Presbyterian Church in Indianapolis.•
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Hello everyone am precious from the united state of America am here to testify in the name of this great man who has brought back happiness into my family after my lover Chris left me for 3years for another woman,i really loved Chris because he was my first love i tried everything within my power to get Chris back to my life but people i met just kept on scamming me and lying to me,Then normally on Saturdays i do go out to make my hair and get some stuff,Then i had people discussing at the saloon if they do listen to there radio well,That there is a program (how i got back my ex)And started talking much about Dr EDDY how this man has helped lots of people in bringing back there lover,So immediately i went close to those ladies i met at the saloon and i explained things to them they said i should try and contact Dr EDDY that he has been the talk of the town and people are really contacting him for help immediately we searched on the internet and read great things about Dr EDDY i now got all Dr EDDY contact instantly at the saloon i gave Dr EDDY a call and i shared my problem with him he just told me not to worry that i should just be happy,He just told me to send him some few details which i did,And then he got back to me that everything would be okay within 36hours i was so happy then Dr EDDY did his work and he did not fail me,My lover Chris came to me in tears and apologized to me for leaving me in deep pain for good 3years,So he decided to prove that he will never leave me for any reason he made me had access to his account and made me his next of kin on all his will,Now the most perfect thing is that he can't spend a minute without seeing me or calling me,Am so grateful to Dr EDDY for bringing back the happiness which i lack for years,Please contact Dr EDDY for help he is a trustworthy man in email is dreddyspiritualtemple@gmail.com or you can call him or whatsapp him with this number...+23408160830324 (1)If you want your ex back. (2) if you always have bad dreams. (3)You want to be promoted in your office. (4)You want women/men to run after you. (5)If you want a child. (6)[You want to be rich. (7)You want to tie your husband/wife to be yours forever. (8)If you need financial assistance. (9)If you want to stop your Divorce. 10)Help bringing people out of prison. (11)Marriage Spells (12)Miracle Spells (13)Beauty Spells (14)PROPHECY CHARM (15)Attraction Spells (16)Evil Eye Spells. (17)Kissing Spell (18)Remove Sickness Spells. (19)ELECTION WINNING SPELLS. (20)SUCCESS IN EXAMS SPELLS. (21) Charm to get who to love you. CONTACT:dreddyspiritualtemple@gmail.com

  2. The appellate court just said doctors can be sued for reporting child abuse. The most dangerous form of child abuse with the highest mortality rate of any form of child abuse (between 6% and 9% according to the below listed studies). Now doctors will be far less likely to report this form of dangerous child abuse in Indiana. If you want to know what this is, google the names Lacey Spears, Julie Conley (and look at what happened when uninformed judges returned that child against medical advice), Hope Ybarra, and Dixie Blanchard. Here is some really good reporting on what this allegation was: http://media.star-telegram.com/Munchausenmoms/ Here are the two research papers: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0145213487900810 http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0145213403000309 25% of sibling are dead in that second study. 25%!!! Unbelievable ruling. Chilling. Wrong.

  3. MELISA EVA VALUE INVESTMENT Greetings to you from Melisa Eva Value Investment. We offer Business and Personal loans, it is quick and easy and hence can be availed without any hassle. We do not ask for any collateral or guarantors while approving these loans and hence these loans require minimum documentation. We offer great and competitive interest rates of 2% which do not weigh you down too much. These loans have a comfortable pay-back period. Apply today by contacting us on E-mail: melisaeva9@gmail.com WE DO NOT ASK FOR AN UPFRONT FEE. BEWARE OF SCAMMERS AND ONLINE FRAUD.

  4. Mr. Levin says that the BMV engaged in misconduct--that the BMV (or, rather, someone in the BMV) knew Indiana motorists were being overcharged fees but did nothing to correct the situation. Such misconduct, whether engaged in by one individual or by a group, is called theft (defined as knowingly or intentionally exerting unauthorized control over the property of another person with the intent to deprive the other person of the property's value or use). Theft is a crime in Indiana (as it still is in most of the civilized world). One wonders, then, why there have been no criminal prosecutions of BMV officials for this theft? Government misconduct doesn't occur in a vacuum. An individual who works for or oversees a government agency is responsible for the misconduct. In this instance, somebody (or somebodies) with the BMV, at some time, knew Indiana motorists were being overcharged. What's more, this person (or these people), even after having the error of their ways pointed out to them, did nothing to fix the problem. Instead, the overcharges continued. Thus, the taxpayers of Indiana are also on the hook for the millions of dollars in attorneys fees (for both sides; the BMV didn't see fit to avail itself of the services of a lawyer employed by the state government) that had to be spent in order to finally convince the BMV that stealing money from Indiana motorists was a bad thing. Given that the BMV official(s) responsible for this crime continued their misconduct, covered it up, and never did anything until the agency reached an agreeable settlement, it seems the statute of limitations for prosecuting these folks has not yet run. I hope our Attorney General is paying attention to this fiasco and is seriously considering prosecution. Indiana, the state that works . . . for thieves.

  5. I'm glad that attorney Carl Hayes, who represented the BMV in this case, is able to say that his client "is pleased to have resolved the issue". Everyone makes mistakes, even bureaucratic behemoths like Indiana's BMV. So to some extent we need to be forgiving of such mistakes. But when those mistakes are going to cost Indiana taxpayers millions of dollars to rectify (because neither plaintiff's counsel nor Mr. Hayes gave freely of their services, and the BMV, being a state-funded agency, relies on taxpayer dollars to pay these attorneys their fees), the agency doesn't have a right to feel "pleased to have resolved the issue". One is left wondering why the BMV feels so pleased with this resolution? The magnitude of the agency's overcharges might suggest to some that, perhaps, these errors were more than mere oversight. Could this be why the agency is so "pleased" with this resolution? Will Indiana motorists ever be assured that the culture of incompetence (if not worse) that the BMV seems to have fostered is no longer the status quo? Or will even more "overcharges" and lawsuits result? It's fairly obvious who is really "pleased to have resolved the issue", and it's not Indiana's taxpayers who are on the hook for the legal fees generated in these cases.

ADVERTISEMENT