ILNews

Former clerks recall a judge who gave support and kindness

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The Hon. Robert H. Staton achieved many professional milestones in his lengthy career. But after his death on July 18, what people seemed to remember most about him was his enduring positive influence in their lives.

Judge Staton served on the Indiana Court of Appeals for nearly 30 years before retiring in 2000. In that time, he helped shape the careers of the many men and women who clerked for him. Judy Vale Newton was one of those people.
 

staton-judge Staton

“Judge Staton hired his clerks with an eye toward establishing a companionable work environment ... and, indeed, it was,” Newton wrote in an email to Indiana Lawyer. “We law clerks became good friends. Often the judge would call all of us into his office just to talk. Kids, travel, problems, our futures ... he was interested in it all.”

Newton, of the Indianapolis firm Newton Becker Bouwkamp Pendoski, clerked for Judge Staton from 1979 to 1981. She said the judge was “truly a man before his time” in regard to his understanding of family obligations. Judge Staton told her that as long as she kept her production up, during the summer she could work from home several days a week in order to spend time with her two young children.


newton-judy-mug Newton

Linda Hammel, of the Indianapolis firm Yarling & Robinson, clerked for Judge Staton from 1972 to 1976.

“At the time I was his law clerk, I was the only female law clerk on the Court of Appeals,” she said, adding that she met her future husband while clerking.

“Judge Staton married us. We were his first wedding – he was so nervous,” she recalled. “We stayed close over the years, because he was such a big part of starting my career and my family.”

Giving back

In 2005, a group of Judge Staton’s former clerks launched a fundraising campaign with the goal of naming the moot court competition at the Indiana University School of Law – Indianapolis, Judge Staton’s alma mater, in his honor. Leading this effort was attorney Tom Hall of the South Bend Firm Tuesley Hall Konopa, also one of Judge Staton’s former clerks.

“He was a mentor to all of us clerks – he respected us, respected our abilities, and made us better people,” Hall said. “He just did so much for our profession that I felt it very important to recognize him while he was still here.”

Hall, with the help of Hammel and former clerks John Ittenbach and Kevin Knight, reached out to other past clerks, appeals court judges, and friends of Judge Staton, and created an endowed account to allow The Honorable Robert H. Staton Intramural Court Competition to continue in perpetuity.


hall-tom-mug Hall

IU School of Law – Indianapolis Dean Gary Roberts said that in 2007, Judge Staton established a fund to support the Honorable Robert H. Staton Best Brief Scholarship, awarded to a student in the legal analysis, research, and communication class who has written the best brief.

“We were deeply saddened to learn of Judge Staton’s passing,” Roberts said. “He was a great friend of the law school, having served on our alumni board for many years. Not only was he a past president of the board and a past recipient of our Distinguished Alumni Award, he cared deeply about our students.”

Breaking ground

Judge Staton wrote, “The History of Mandatory Continuing Legal Education in Indiana,” featured in the Valparaiso University Law Review in 2006. In that article, he wrote that Indiana State Bar Association president Thomas Scanlon “chose a young, inexperienced lawyer” (Staton) to lead a team in creating a glossy new publication for the ISBA. Under Staton’s leadership, the team published the first edition of Res Gestae in November of 1956, with Staton becoming its first editor.

Judge Staton was also chairman of a task force in 1984 that researched mandatory continuing legal education in 17 other states. The group put together a recommendation that Indiana adopt mandatory CLE requirements, presenting its research for the 1985 spring meeting of the ISBA. The House of Delegates approved the rule as submitted by the task force. Later, the Indiana Supreme Court adopted Rule 29, which calls for mandatory CLE, and the rule became effective on Oct. 1, 1986. Judge Staton became the first chairman of the Indiana Commission for Continuing Legal Education, making Indiana the 18th state to adopt such requirements.

Judge Staton was president of the law school’s alumni association and served on its board of directors from 2004 to 2007. He served on the executive council for IU, representing the law school.

The judge was a prolific writer – he wrote more than 3,000 majority opinions during his time on the appeals court, and he was known for his historical accounts of Indiana’s legal system.

“He was a student of the history of the law, so often you would find in the footnotes in his opinions an explanation of how the law came about … even back to Roman times,” Hammel said.

He also received the title of “life honorary editor” of the Indiana Law Review.

Early career

Judge Staton served in World War II with the 91st Infantry Division of the 5th Army and was attached to the 801 Special Combat Force, which specialized in reconnaissance work behind enemy lines. He achieved the rank of major and was awarded numerous medals, including a Silver Star, two Bronze Stars, and the Distinguished Flying Cross.

After earning his law degree in 1955, he became a deputy prosecuting attorney in Marion County, eventually becoming chief trial deputy prosecutor. He then entered private practice, founding the firm of Staton & Ward.

John Ittenbach became the judge’s first clerk after Judge Staton was elected to the Indiana Court of Appeals in 1970, the last appellate court election before merit-selection began in 1971.

“Being able to finish the last two years of law school while clerking for him was probably the best thing that ever happened to me,” Ittenbach said. In addition to learning about writing persuasively and analytical thinking, Ittenbach, of the firm Ittenbach Johnson Trettin & Koeller, said he learned about the importance of character in the legal profession.

“In my opinion he was a gentleman lawyer – he never said anything disparaging about anybody else,” Ittenbach said. “I consider him a mentor and a model for how lawyers should be. I’ve been practicing law for 37 years now, and I would still go to him for advice occasionally.”

The judge taught his clerks not only how to practice law, Ittebach said, but how to appreciate it.

Judge Staton, who was 86, was preceded in death by his wife, Jane Ellen (Cox) Staton. He is survived by his two daughters who are also attorneys, Jennifer Staton Stoesz (Steven), of Carmel; and Elizabeth Staton Idleman (Scott), of Milwaukee. He has four grandchildren.

Memorial contributions may be made to The Honorable Robert H. Staton Intramural Moot Court Competition at IU School of Law – Indianapolis c/o IU Foundation Showalter House, P.O. Box 500, Bloomington, Ind., 47402; or Carmel Clay Public Library Foundation, 55 4th Ave. S.E., Carmel, Ind., 46032. Funeral services were July 25 at Second Presbyterian Church in Indianapolis.•
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. On a related note, I offered the ICLU my cases against the BLE repeatedly, and sought their amici aid repeatedly as well. Crickets. Usually not even a response. I am guessing they do not do allegations of anti-Christian bias? No matter how glaring? I have posted on other links the amicus brief that did get filed (search this ezine, e.g., Kansas attorney), read the Thomas More Society brief to note what the ACLU ran from like vampires from garlic. An Examiner pledged to advance diversity and inclusion came right out on the record and demanded that I choose Man's law or God's law. I wonder, had I been asked to swear off Allah ... what result then, ICLU? Had I been found of bad character and fitness for advocating sexual deviance, what result then ICLU? Had I been lifetime banned for posting left of center statements denigrating the US Constitution, what result ICLU? Hey, we all know don't we? Rather Biased.

  2. It was mentioned in the article that there have been numerous CLE events to train attorneys on e-filing. I would like someone to provide a list of those events, because I have not seen any such events in east central Indiana, and since Hamilton County is one of the counties where e-filing is mandatory, one would expect some instruction in this area. Come on, people, give some instruction, not just applause!

  3. This law is troubling in two respects: First, why wasn't the law reviewed "with the intention of getting all the facts surrounding the legislation and its actual impact on the marketplace" BEFORE it was passed and signed? Seems a bit backwards to me (even acknowledging that this is the Indiana state legislature we're talking about. Second, what is it with the laws in this state that seem to create artificial monopolies in various industries? Besides this one, the other law that comes to mind is the legislation that governed the granting of licenses to firms that wanted to set up craft distilleries. The licensing was limited to only those entities that were already in the craft beer brewing business. Republicans in this state talk a big game when it comes to being "business friendly". They're friendly alright . . . to certain businesses.

  4. Gretchen, Asia, Roberto, Tonia, Shannon, Cheri, Nicholas, Sondra, Carey, Laura ... my heart breaks for you, reaching out in a forum in which you are ignored by a professional suffering through both compassion fatigue and the love of filthy lucre. Most if not all of you seek a warm blooded Hoosier attorney unafraid to take on the government and plead that government officials have acted unconstitutionally to try to save a family and/or rescue children in need and/or press individual rights against the Leviathan state. I know an attorney from Kansas who has taken such cases across the country, arguing before half of the federal courts of appeal and presenting cases to the US S.Ct. numerous times seeking cert. Unfortunately, due to his zeal for the constitutional rights of peasants and willingness to confront powerful government bureaucrats seemingly violating the same ... he was denied character and fitness certification to join the Indiana bar, even after he was cleared to sit for, and passed, both the bar exam and ethics exam. And was even admitted to the Indiana federal bar! NOW KNOW THIS .... you will face headwinds and difficulties in locating a zealously motivated Hoosier attorney to face off against powerful government agents who violate the constitution, for those who do so tend to end up as marginalized as Paul Odgen, who was driven from the profession. So beware, many are mere expensive lapdogs, the kind of breed who will gladly take a large retainer, but then fail to press against the status quo and powers that be when told to heel to. It is a common belief among some in Indiana that those attorneys who truly fight the power and rigorously confront corruption often end up, actually or metaphorically, in real life or at least as to their careers, as dead as the late, great Gary Welch. All of that said, I wish you the very best in finding a Hoosier attorney with a fighting spirit to press your rights as far as you can, for you do have rights against government actors, no matter what said actors may tell you otherwise. Attorneys outside the elitist camp are often better fighters that those owing the powers that be for their salaries, corner offices and end of year bonuses. So do not be afraid to retain a green horn or unconnected lawyer, many of them are fine men and woman who are yet untainted by the "unique" Hoosier system.

  5. I am not the John below. He is a journalist and talk show host who knows me through my years working in Kansas government. I did no ask John to post the note below ...

ADVERTISEMENT