ILNews

Former COA chief judge, IBF founder dies

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A former chief judge of the Indiana Court of Appeals and a founder of the Indianapolis Bar Foundation died Thursday.

Judge Paul H. Buchanan Jr., 90, served nine years as chief judge of the Court of Appeals after being elected to the bench in 1971. He was active in the Indianapolis Bar Association, serving as president, at which time he helped organize the Indianapolis Bar Foundation in 1968. He served on the IBF's original board of directors until he retired from it in 1999. Judge Buchanan is also credited with helping re-start the IBF's Ask-A-Lawyer program.

The Indianapolis Bar Association created an award in 1990 named after the judge, who was a longtime supporter of the IBA and IBF.

"Judge Buchanan was the heart and soul of the Indianapolis Bar Foundation through his generous support and continuing interests in promoting a positive image for lawyers through the good work done by the foundation," said Mary Marsh, an IBA past president and 2003 recipient of the Buchanan Award, in an e-mail.

Nancy J. Gargula, president of the IBF in 1999 and 2000, said in a statement that it was Judge Buchanan's commitment and dedication to the legal profession, his leadership, and vision that led to the establishment of the IBF.

"When I look at all the Foundation has accomplished in the ensuing years, Judge Buchanan's impact on the Indianapolis community is truly remarkable," she said.

Before becoming a judge, he was a managing partner at law firm Bose Buchanan McKinney Evans; he retired from the Court of Appeals Jan. 1, 1993.

Current Court of Appeals Chief Judge John G. Baker said Judge Buchanan and another former chief judge, Jonathan Robertson, who passed away in October, were the first ones to talk with him about considering joining the Court of Appeals.

The chief judge remembered Judge Buchanan as a renaissance man, one who could discuss sports, arts, literature, and politics in any order. The chief judge worked with Judge Buchanan for nearly four years on the Court of Appeals and knew him as an interesting, accomplished gentleman.

"I think the most lasting thing I will remember about Judge Buchanan is his insistence on clarity and language," said Chief Judge Baker. "He was a wordsmith."

Chief Judge Baker alluded to Judge Buchanan's articles in "Res Gestae," which helped others refine their writing.

Judge Buchanan had a keen interest in the arts and was a collector and longtime arts community supporter. Chief Judge Baker also remembered Judge Buchanan as someone who was very proud of the judiciary, who wanted to protect its integrity and keep the court out of partisan politics.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Indiana State Bar Association

Indianapolis Bar Association

Evansville Bar Association

Allen County Bar Association

Indiana Lawyer on Facebook

facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Poor Judge Brown probably thought that by slavishly serving the godz of the age her violations of 18th century concepts like due process and the rule of law would be overlooked. Mayhaps she was merely a Judge ahead of her time?

  2. in a lawyer discipline case Judge Brown, now removed, was presiding over a hearing about a lawyer accused of the supposedly heinous ethical violation of saying the words "Illegal immigrant." (IN re Barker) http://www.in.gov/judiciary/files/order-discipline-2013-55S00-1008-DI-429.pdf .... I wonder if when we compare the egregious violations of due process by Judge Brown, to her chiding of another lawyer for politically incorrectness, if there are any conclusions to be drawn about what kind of person, what kind of judge, what kind of apparatchik, is busy implementing the agenda of political correctness and making off-limits legit advocacy about an adverse party in a suit whose illegal alien status is relevant? I am just asking the question, the reader can make own conclsuion. Oh wait-- did I use the wrong adjective-- let me rephrase that, um undocumented alien?

  3. of course the bigger questions of whether or not the people want to pay for ANY bussing is off limits, due to the Supreme Court protecting the people from DEMOCRACY. Several decades hence from desegregation and bussing plans and we STILL need to be taking all this taxpayer money to combat mostly-imagined "discrimination" in the most obviously failed social program of the postwar period.

  4. You can put your photos anywhere you like... When someone steals it they know it doesn't belong to them. And, a man getting a divorce is automatically not a nice guy...? That's ridiculous. Since when is need of money a conflict of interest? That would mean that no one should have a job unless they are already financially solvent without a job... A photographer is also under no obligation to use a watermark (again, people know when a photo doesn't belong to them) or provide contact information. Hey, he didn't make it easy for me to pay him so I'll just take it! Well heck, might as well walk out of the grocery store with a cart full of food because the lines are too long and you don't find that convenient. "Only in Indiana." Oh, now you're passing judgement on an entire state... What state do you live in? I need to characterize everyone in your state as ignorant and opinionated. And the final bit of ignorance; assuming a photo anyone would want is lucky and then how much does your camera have to cost to make it a good photo, in your obviously relevant opinion?

  5. Seventh Circuit Court Judge Diane Wood has stated in “The Rule of Law in Times of Stress” (2003), “that neither laws nor the procedures used to create or implement them should be secret; and . . . the laws must not be arbitrary.” According to the American Bar Association, Wood’s quote drives home this point: The rule of law also requires that people can expect predictable results from the legal system; this is what Judge Wood implies when she says that “the laws must not be arbitrary.” Predictable results mean that people who act in the same way can expect the law to treat them in the same way. If similar actions do not produce similar legal outcomes, people cannot use the law to guide their actions, and a “rule of law” does not exist.

ADVERTISEMENT