The U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Indiana has filed mail fraud charges against a former Indianapolis attorney
who resigned from the bar two years ago.
A result of an FBI investigation, U.S. Attorney Tim Morrison on Thursday filed charges against Brian L. Nehrig, 43, who practiced
at an Indianapolis law firm before resigning in August 2007. His foreclosure work at the firm between February 28, 2005, and
Oct. 11, 2006, is the focus of the case.
His duties were to attend sheriff's sales and place minimum price bids on foreclosed properties for CitiMorgage, so that
third-party bidders could then put their offers in and CitiMortgage could recover money from the sale if a property was sold
for more than the minimum. But without the client's authorization, Nehrig is accused of intentionally inflating those
minimum bidding prices and then completing the sales with third-party bidders, whom he was associated with outside of CitiMortgage's
knowledge and permission. Nehrig hid the conduct by sending CitiMortgage a check for its minimum $1 price to make the company
believe its property sold at the sheriff's sale in an arm's length transaction, the charging document alleges.
On many occasions, Nehrig directed a law firm employee to alter the titleholder's name on the deeds from CitiMortgage
to replace it with the name of the third party with whom he'd negotiated the outside deal, the charges state. The total
difference between the funds sent to CitiMortgage and the actual received funds from the deals was $106,122, and he didn't
send the money back to CitiMortgage, the document says. Properties listed in the charging document are scattered throughout
the state.
Nehrig faces 20 years in prison and a $250,000 fine if convicted.
In August 2007, the Indiana Supreme Court concluded a disciplinary action against Nehrig by accepting his resignation. The
Disciplinary Commission had filed misconduct charges against him and asked for his immediate suspension earlier that year.














I highly recommend Deanna and her team of professionals that serve the legal community. Great information and many thanks for sharing.
they are pushing these cases against lawyers too far. thought-crime.
vagueness cannot challenged, so let's write all laws vaguely and throw the constitution out the window.Even if the court is operating under a particular law, if they don't it they will change it to their liking. What a joke!!!
Two convictions becomes one conviction with exactly the same sentence, only it is not clear wheter or not that sentence will be 18 months, 120 months or 138 months. Actually if the guns were in a home, whether or not they were his, he is protected under the 2nd amendment. Jurors need to learn the law and the constitution before judging others. The cour5ts need to do this as well.
With all due respect, Rick, I think you probably would be making a mistake by going to law school. The job market for attorneys is so saturated, you may well find yourself unemployed and with a lot of debt. You mention law would be a good supplement to your skills. True. But employers unfortunately don't value that. You will find that a law degree may well pigeonhole you into an attorney slot and limit career options. If you have a good job now I would hold onto that. As an attorney, you may well end up making less with the aforementioned debt.