A former deputy clerk for Indiana’s appellate courts died July 5 in Wisconsin from complications following a heart
transplant.
David Ray Schanker, 55, served as deputy clerk of the Indiana Supreme Court, Court of Appeals, and Tax Court for seven years
until he joined the Wisconsin court system in 2007. Schanker earned his law degree from Indiana University Maurer School of
Law – Bloomington and served as judicial clerk for two years to then-Chief Judge John T. Sharpnack of the Court of Appeals
in the 1990s. He practiced at Kightlinger & Grey before working for the appellate court.
Judge Sharpnack, now a senior judge, said that Schanker was the first person he ever hired during their job interview. Before
his legal career, Schanker – a New Jersey native – worked in theatre and film, earning an MFA in creative writing
from Columbia University. He authored several short stories, legal-themed novels, and plays. That experience with language
also helped encourage Judge Sharpnack to hire him.
“He was clearly a bright person,” the judge said. “He was extremely helpful, very hard working, very bright,
empathetic, and concerned about the people in the cases we were working on.”
While serving as Judge Sharpnack’s clerk, Schanker wrote a mystery about a clerk on the court of appeals. The judge
said he was nervous the project, but that it turned out fine.
“He assured me I wasn’t like the character of the judge on the court of appeals,” he said.
Schanker brought computer literacy skills to the court, as well as persuaded Judge Sharpnack to introduce casual Fridays
and donuts and conversations on that day. That tradition lasted long after Schanker left, he said.
“He was one of my very best clerks and a person I have a high admiration for,” he said.
Schanker had a heart transplant in March and passed away after developing an infection in his gallbladder at the end of June.
He is survived by his wife, Suzanne Buchko, daughters Inez Chesire Buchko Schanker and Julia Xhikuang Buchko Schanker; sister
Beth Hume, and parents Robert and Claire Schanker.•














The court of appeals not only tries to rewrite or interpret the law to suit their fancy, now they choose play stupid as well. Every consideration must be given to pro se litigants, who are not held to the same standards as attorneys, as stated by,SCOTUS. I assume they didn't have a lawyer, since one wasn't mentioned and I strongly suggest thatb the rest of the, origional petitioners get back in there and fight for their rights.
the irony of situations like this is that the clients whom conour cheated are the ones who should be pulling hardest for him to remain free and keep his law license, so they have some hopes of him paying back. really bury the guy deep and then there will be little hope of restitution
Qualified immunity, means that if you wear a badge, you are exempt from law and free to do anything you please! The courts will back badge toting individuals, because they think they are above the law as well. They think, they have judicial immunity, they do not.
Deeply, deeply concerned? I'll bet if it was the judge's money that had been swindled we'd see deep concern with actual consequences. First a Ponzi scheme, then a shell game with the assets…c'mon, hasn't Conour abused the judicial system and his clients long enough? I say enough already.
Wow, just wow.