ILNews

Former Indiana Supreme Court chief justice dies

Jennifer Nelson
July 22, 2009
Keywords
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A Former Indiana Supreme Court Chief Justice who was known for his colloquialisms and quick wit died Tuesday morning at his home.

Justice Richard Givan, 88, was remembered by former colleagues for his quick wit, storytelling ability, and mentoring. Many also referred to his "Givanisms," sayings such as, "You pile on too many apples, you can't shove the cart."

Chief Justice Randall T. Shepard, who served with the former justice from 1985 to 1994 and described him as an energetic judge and friend, said Justice Givan would often say, "When the automobile was invented my father's buggy worked just fine, but he bought a car anyway."

Justice Brent Dickson, who joined the Supreme Court in 1986, remembered one of his favoring sayings: "This is like a one-car traffic jam." The "Givanisms" were so popular that those who went to his retirement dinner in January 1995 found Justice Givan's favorite sayings printed out for them to take home.

At his retirement ceremony, he joked about being replaced by former Justice Myra Selby, the first woman to serve on the Indiana Supreme Court.

"I have a lot of faith in women. After all, I live in a sorority house," he said, referring to his wife and four daughters. In fact, he would tell his wife and daughters that he had to come to the office to make decisions once in a while.

The Indianapolis native was elected to the Supreme Court in 1968 and served until his retirement in December 1994; he was the chief justice from November 1974 to March 1987. He authored more than 1,500 majority opinions, dissented in more than 400 cases, and heard nearly 6,000 cases while on the bench.

Justice Dickson described Justice Givan as a model for dealing with the apparent conflict between personal beliefs and judicial duties. As a Quaker, Justice Givan advocated for the repeal of the death penalty statute in Indiana while he was in the legislature, but once he became a judge, he authored many opinions affirming death sentences by trial courts.

"He explained that his obligation under his oath of judicial office to uphold the laws of the State of Indiana prevailed over his personal, moral, and religious beliefs," Justice Dickson said in a statement. "After he retired from the court, Dick Givan resumed his opposition to the death penalty and even testified against it before a legislative committee."

The former chief justice was also a great storyteller, and often a brief or an opinion would remind him of a story with a lesson about how to deal with a client or how to handle a difficult courtroom situation, said Lafayette attorney Jerome L. Withered, who served as a law clerk to Justice Givan in the 1970s. He said the former justice never had trouble making decisions, despite his jokes with his family. The justice compared his role as judge to that of an umpire: Call the balls and strikes as you see them no matter who the players or teams are.

"It was not easy to predict his rulings," he said.

Justice Givan served as a pilot in the U.S. Army Air Corps during World War II and later was a flight instructor with the Air Corps Reservists. He received his LL.B. from Indiana University in 1951, where he worked as assistant librarian and research assistant to the Indiana Supreme Court. He was admitted to the bar in 1952 and was a fourth-generation lawyer.

Before joining the high court, Justice Givan served as an assistant attorney general, a Marion County deputy prosecutor, worked in private practice, and was a state representative in the 1967 session.

He is survived by his brother William C. Givan; daughters Madalyn Hesson, Sandy Chenoweth, Patty Smith, and Libby Whipple; 14 grandchildren; and 15 great-grandchildren.

The calling will be from 4 to 8 p.m. July 27 at Hall-Baker Funeral Home, 339 E. Main St., Plainfield. The funeral will be at 11 a.m. July 28 at the Fairfield Friends Church, 7040 S. County Road 1050 East, Camby.

Memorial contributions may be sent to Fairfield Friends Meeting General or Building Fund, or to the Hendricks County Community Foundation, 5055 E. Main St., Suite A., Avon, IN 46123, where the Givan Legacy Fund has been established to fund grants for projects that give back to the community.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Indiana State Bar Association

Indianapolis Bar Association

Evansville Bar Association

Allen County Bar Association

Indiana Lawyer on Facebook

facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. I like the concept. Seems like a good idea and really inexpensive to manage.

  2. I don't agree that this is an extreme case. There are more of these people than you realize - people that are vindictive and/or with psychological issues have clogged the system with baseless suits that are costly to the defendant and to taxpayers. Restricting repeat offenders from further abusing the system is not akin to restricting their freedon, but to protecting their victims, and the court system, from allowing them unfettered access. From the Supreme Court opinion "he has burdened the opposing party and the courts of this state at every level with massive, confusing, disorganized, defective, repetitive, and often meritless filings."

  3. So, if you cry wolf one too many times courts may "restrict" your ability to pursue legal action? Also, why is document production equated with wealth? Anyone can "produce probably tens of thousands of pages of filings" if they have a public library card. I understand this is an extreme case, but our Supreme Court really got this one wrong.

  4. He called our nation a nation of cowards because we didn't want to talk about race. That was a cheap shot coming from the top cop. The man who decides who gets the federal government indicts. Wow. Not a gentleman if that is the measure. More importantly, this insult delivered as we all understand, to white people-- without him or anybody needing to explain that is precisely what he meant-- but this is an insult to timid white persons who fear the government and don't want to say anything about race for fear of being accused a racist. With all the legal heat that can come down on somebody if they say something which can be construed by a prosecutor like Mr Holder as racist, is it any wonder white people-- that's who he meant obviously-- is there any surprise that white people don't want to talk about race? And as lawyers we have even less freedom lest our remarks be considered violations of the rules. Mr Holder also demonstrated his bias by publically visiting with the family of the young man who was killed by a police offering in the line of duty, which was a very strong indicator of bias agains the offer who is under investigation, and was a failure to lead properly by letting his investigators do their job without him predetermining the proper outcome. He also has potentially biased the jury pool. All in all this worsens race relations by feeding into the perception shared by whites as well as blacks that justice will not be impartial. I will say this much, I do not blame Obama for all of HOlder's missteps. Obama has done a lot of things to stay above the fray and try and be a leader for all Americans. Maybe he should have reigned Holder in some but Obama's got his hands full with other problelms. Oh did I mention HOlder is a bank crony who will probably get a job in a silkstocking law firm working for millions of bucks a year defending bankers whom he didn't have the integrity or courage to hold to account for their acts of fraud on the United States, other financial institutions, and the people. His tenure will be regarded by history as a failure of leadership at one of the most important jobs in our nation. Finally and most importantly besides him insulting the public and letting off the big financial cheats, he has been at the forefront of over-prosecuting the secrecy laws to punish whistleblowers and chill free speech. What has Holder done to vindicate the rights of privacy of the American public against the illegal snooping of the NSA? He could have charged NSA personnel with violations of law for their warrantless wiretapping which has been done millions of times and instead he did not persecute a single soul. That is a defalcation of historical proportions and it signals to the public that the government DOJ under him was not willing to do a damn thing to protect the public against the rapid growth of the illegal surveillance state. Who else could have done this? Nobody. And for that omission Obama deserves the blame too. Here were are sliding into a police state and Eric Holder made it go all the faster.

  5. JOE CLAYPOOL candidate for Superior Court in Harrison County - Indiana This candidate is misleading voters to think he is a Judge by putting Elect Judge Joe Claypool on his campaign literature. paragraphs 2 and 9 below clearly indicate this injustice to voting public to gain employment. What can we do? Indiana Code - Section 35-43-5-3: Deception (a) A person who: (1) being an officer, manager, or other person participating in the direction of a credit institution, knowingly or intentionally receives or permits the receipt of a deposit or other investment, knowing that the institution is insolvent; (2) knowingly or intentionally makes a false or misleading written statement with intent to obtain property, employment, or an educational opportunity; (3) misapplies entrusted property, property of a governmental entity, or property of a credit institution in a manner that the person knows is unlawful or that the person knows involves substantial risk of loss or detriment to either the owner of the property or to a person for whose benefit the property was entrusted; (4) knowingly or intentionally, in the regular course of business, either: (A) uses or possesses for use a false weight or measure or other device for falsely determining or recording the quality or quantity of any commodity; or (B) sells, offers, or displays for sale or delivers less than the represented quality or quantity of any commodity; (5) with intent to defraud another person furnishing electricity, gas, water, telecommunication, or any other utility service, avoids a lawful charge for that service by scheme or device or by tampering with facilities or equipment of the person furnishing the service; (6) with intent to defraud, misrepresents the identity of the person or another person or the identity or quality of property; (7) with intent to defraud an owner of a coin machine, deposits a slug in that machine; (8) with intent to enable the person or another person to deposit a slug in a coin machine, makes, possesses, or disposes of a slug; (9) disseminates to the public an advertisement that the person knows is false, misleading, or deceptive, with intent to promote the purchase or sale of property or the acceptance of employment;

ADVERTISEMENT