Judge William T. Means, a former judge on the St. Joseph Superior Court for more than two decades, died Oct. 21 at the age
80.
Judge Means retired from the bench in September 2008. He had fallen ill shortly before his retirement and was in and out
of the hospital or rehabilitation centers until his death, said St. Joseph Circuit Judge Michael Gotsch. Gotsch, who appeared
numerous times in Judge Means' courtroom as an attorney before joining the bench, said it was a pleasure to try a case
in front of Judge Means.
"I feel he was the best judge to try a case in front of because he was very gracious and didn't intervene in your
case or interfere in how you wanted to present your case," he said.
St. Joseph Superior Chief Judge Michael Scopelitis agreed, saying Judge Means had an excellent demeanor for a judge. He was
always calm and respectful to everyone in his courtroom, no matter what happened in court or if someone misbehaved.
Judge Means earned his J.D. from the University of Michigan in 1953 and was admitted to the Indiana bar in 1955. Prior to
joining the bench in the mid 1980s, he was city attorney for Mishawaka, worked as Republican Party chair, was head of the
license branch for the Republican Party, and worked in private practice.
Judge Means earned his bachelor's degree from the University of Southern California in 1950. He was active in local theater.
Judge Means was a member of the St. Joseph County and Indiana State Bar associations, as well as Michigan Alumni Club, Mishawaka
Republican Party, Presbyterian Players, and First United Methodist Church of Mishawaka.
He is survived by his daughters Margaret Means (William Bergerson) and Rachel Means (Eric Grant); a granddaughter; and sister
Marilyn Copeland. He was preceded in death by his wife, Francianne Ivick.
The family will receive friends from 4 to 8 p.m. Thursday at Bubb Funeral Chapel, 3910 N. Main St., Mishawaka. A memorial
service will be held at the chapel at 11 a.m. on Friday.














Qualified immunity, means that if you wear a badge, you are exempt from law and free to do anything you please! The courts will back badge toting individuals, because they think they are above the law as well. They think, they have judicial immunity, they do not.
Deeply, deeply concerned? I'll bet if it was the judge's money that had been swindled we'd see deep concern with actual consequences. First a Ponzi scheme, then a shell game with the assets…c'mon, hasn't Conour abused the judicial system and his clients long enough? I say enough already.
Wow, just wow.
Forcing a defendant to wear a stun belt, in court or otherwise, is a violation of american principles! It is also unconstitutional!
So, if I save $100.00 cash per week, from my $500.00 per week paycheck, for 50 years, at which time, I will have saved $260,000.00, the government can raid my home and take my money, just by saying it is drug money! Shouldn't the government, have some kind of evidence of drugs, rather, than just saying we are the government and we will take anything you own, anytime we choose? Tyranny is upon us! If you don't know your rights, you don't have any!