ILNews

Former Venture employee turns on Bales during testimony

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

SOUTH BEND — An FBI investigation into Venture Real Estate Services and principals John Bales and Bill Spencer had already begun when Matthew Dyer signed on as the company's controller in December 2009.

Bales told him about the federal investigation during the interview process and said the company had done nothing illegal, Dyer testified Wednesday in U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Indiana.

Dyer, who worked at Venture until February 2012, prepared the company's financial statements, cut its checks and managed properties including an Elkhart office building leased by the state's Department of Child Services and owned by Indianapolis attorney Paul Page through a company called L&BAB LLC. Bales provided Page with a down payment to buy the building via a company called BAB Equity LLC.

Prosecutors say the secret arrangement was a violation of a leasing agreement between Venture and the state of Indiana that barred the company from direct or indirect ownership of properties where state agencies leased space. The defense argues the arrangement was a loan and not ownership.

Dyer testified Wednesday that he disagreed with Bales and Spencer about the arrangement being a loan. He recalled three occasions where he discussed the matter with Bales, who never disclosed to the state Venture's involvement in the Elkhart deal outside of brokering the lease.

"Equity means ownership," Dyer said Wednesday. "If it was truly a loan, I would have called it BAB Loan or BAB Mortgage."

Bales' reaction during the conversations, Dyer said, was to blame Spencer, his general counsel and now co-defendant. As Dyer recalls, Bales profanely lamented that he had "trusted" Bill to protect him, and Bill "f--ked" him.

Dyer said he was responsible for managing the Elkhart property on behalf of owner Paul Page. Dyer said he noticed in summer 2009 that Page had withdrawn funds from the building's checking account in violation of an understanding that rent revenue from the state would first go to pay back Bales. There apparently was no pre-arranged payment schedule, as would be typical with a loan.

Dyer said he alerted Bales, who moved to place a mortgage on the property to protect his investment. And Page responded by firing Venture as property manager.

In 2010, Dyer said he realized Venture hadn't paid the state a portion of the Elkhart lease commission, about $22,000, required under the contract. The entire $88,400 commission had gone to Bales to repay part of his $362,000 down payment.

Dyer said he told Bales about the unpaid balance owed to the state. His boss' response, as Dyer recalled it: "F--k them. They owe us money, so I can pay them whenever I want."

A few weeks later, after Dyer completed a full audit and reminded Bales about the outstanding payment, Bales told him to cut the state a check. A portion of the money was routed right back to Venture to cover unpaid commissions on other lease deals.

Bales attorney Larry Mackey noted in his cross examination that Dyer shared more information, including the equity versus ownership conversations, in a follow-up interview with the FBI and federal prosecutors shortly before the trial, than he had during an interview months earlier.

Dyer said he simply was not asked to elaborate during the earlier interview, and he was acting on his attorney's advice "not to volunteer information or go on a tangent."

Mackey also sought to challenge Dyer's credibility by bringing up an insurance claim Dyer filed that was later denied.

Dyer acknowledged during questioning that he had received a letter from Erie Insurance Co. shortly before his follow-up interview with federal authorities notifying him that his claim on a stolen vehicle had been denied. The insurance company determined he had made false statements.

Later, on redirect, Dyer said he had told the insurance company the truth.

"The cops caught the guy who stole my car," he added.

Assistant U.S. Attorney Jesse Barrett has argued Bales and Spencer were well aware their arrangement in Elkhart would not pass the state's smell test.

Former Indiana Department of Administration Commissioner Carrie Henderson testified Tuesday about a conversation in which Bales suggested Venture could provide financing for state-leased buildings to help close deals. She told him he "absolutely couldn't do that kind of deal with the state of Indiana."

Former Indianapolis Deputy Mayor Michael Huber, who oversaw Venture's contract as a deputy commissioner at IDOA under Henderson from 2007 to 2008, added more fuel in testimony Wednesday.

Huber said he asked Bales and Spencer in 2007 to explore options for leasing storage space for the Indiana Stadium and Convention Building Authority, which at the time was leading construction of Lucas Oil Stadium and an expansion of the Indiana Convention Center.

He said Venture informally suggested about a dozen options. Huber asked whether Venture had any ownership position in any of the buildings it was suggesting.

"They identified two or three where they had interests," Huber said. "We agreed that future discussions had to be about properties without ownership of Venture."

Huber acknowledged on cross examination by Bales attorney Jason Barclay that he had no personal involvement in the Elkhart deal. Barclay also introduced records indicating Venture's formal recommendations on buildings to lease for the Indiana Stadium and Convention Building Authority included only one building in which Venture had an interest, and that interest was disclosed.

Also on Wednesday, Barrett asked former IDOA Commissioner Mark Everson and Steve Harless, who handles the state's leasing efforts, to characterize their reaction to a series of IBJ stories that addressed the Elkhart deal. The stories prompted state officials to question Venture employees including Bales and Spencer.

Both men said they were satisfied, to varying degrees, with Venture's claim it had no ownership interest in the Elkhart building.

That apparently changed when an IBJ story in May 2010 revealed several details that were news to state officials. The story, based on a review of dozens of pages of records relating to the Elkhart deal, reported that the Bales-controlled BAB Equity held a second mortgage and that Venture had been paid both a commission and a development fee on the deal.

Venture had told the state the landlord, L&BAB, had not yet paid Venture's commission.

Harless testified Thursday that the IBJ story was the first he heard about the commission or development fee. And his skepticism grew as Venture's principals began ignoring his questions via email. He called the notion that Venture invested in a state-leased building a "significant conflict of interest."

Mackey took a particularly confrontational approach when he cross-examined Harless, questioning his credentials and asking whether Harless had a "hard-on" for Venture, meaning an ax to grind. Harless said no.

By way of example, Mackey noted that Venture had worked for months on a plan to lease offices for the Department of Revenue, but Harless wound up tapping competitor Resource Commercial Real Estate to broker the deal and collect a commission in the neighborhood of $200,000.

Harless gave more testimony Thursday morning, which was expected to be followed by additional government witnesses. The defense is scheduled to make its case next week.

One name that's unlikely to resurface: Carl Brizzi, the former two-term Marion County prosecutor. A couple of witnesses mentioned his name during testimony Wednesday, and defense attorneys promptly objected and asked for the references to be stricken from the record.

At some point after the Elkhart deal closed, Page added Brizzi as a co-owner of the building without requiring him to invest money or take out debt. Brizzi has not been charged with a crime and has denied wrongdoing.

The IBJ is a sister publication of Indiana Lawyer.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. I have been on this program while on parole from 2011-2013. No person should be forced mentally to share private details of their personal life with total strangers. Also giving permission for a mental therapist to report to your parole agent that your not participating in group therapy because you don't have the financial mean to be in the group therapy. I was personally singled out and sent back three times for not having money and also sent back within the six month when you aren't to be sent according to state law. I will work to het this INSOMM's removed from this state. I also had twelve or thirteen parole agents with a fifteen month period. Thanks for your time.

  2. Our nation produces very few jurists of the caliber of Justice DOUGLAS and his peers these days. Here is that great civil libertarian, who recognized government as both a blessing and, when corrupted by ideological interests, a curse: "Once the investigator has only the conscience of government as a guide, the conscience can become ‘ravenous,’ as Cromwell, bent on destroying Thomas More, said in Bolt, A Man For All Seasons (1960), p. 120. The First Amendment mirrors many episodes where men, harried and harassed by government, sought refuge in their conscience, as these lines of Thomas More show: ‘MORE: And when we stand before God, and you are sent to Paradise for doing according to your conscience, *575 and I am damned for not doing according to mine, will you come with me, for fellowship? ‘CRANMER: So those of us whose names are there are damned, Sir Thomas? ‘MORE: I don't know, Your Grace. I have no window to look into another man's conscience. I condemn no one. ‘CRANMER: Then the matter is capable of question? ‘MORE: Certainly. ‘CRANMER: But that you owe obedience to your King is not capable of question. So weigh a doubt against a certainty—and sign. ‘MORE: Some men think the Earth is round, others think it flat; it is a matter capable of question. But if it is flat, will the King's command make it round? And if it is round, will the King's command flatten it? No, I will not sign.’ Id., pp. 132—133. DOUGLAS THEN WROTE: Where government is the Big Brother,11 privacy gives way to surveillance. **909 But our commitment is otherwise. *576 By the First Amendment we have staked our security on freedom to promote a multiplicity of ideas, to associate at will with kindred spirits, and to defy governmental intrusion into these precincts" Gibson v. Florida Legislative Investigation Comm., 372 U.S. 539, 574-76, 83 S. Ct. 889, 908-09, 9 L. Ed. 2d 929 (1963) Mr. Justice DOUGLAS, concurring. I write: Happy Memorial Day to all -- God please bless our fallen who lived and died to preserve constitutional governance in our wonderful series of Republics. And God open the eyes of those government officials who denounce the constitutions of these Republics by arbitrary actions arising out capricious motives.

  3. From back in the day before secularism got a stranglehold on Hoosier jurists comes this great excerpt via Indiana federal court judge Allan Sharp, dedicated to those many Indiana government attorneys (with whom I have dealt) who count the law as a mere tool, an optional tool that is not to be used when political correctness compels a more acceptable result than merely following the path that the law directs: ALLEN SHARP, District Judge. I. In a scene following a visit by Henry VIII to the home of Sir Thomas More, playwriter Robert Bolt puts the following words into the mouths of his characters: Margaret: Father, that man's bad. MORE: There is no law against that. ROPER: There is! God's law! MORE: Then God can arrest him. ROPER: Sophistication upon sophistication! MORE: No, sheer simplicity. The law, Roper, the law. I know what's legal not what's right. And I'll stick to what's legal. ROPER: Then you set man's law above God's! MORE: No, far below; but let me draw your attention to a fact I'm not God. The currents and eddies of right and wrong, which you find such plain sailing, I can't navigate. I'm no voyager. But in the thickets of law, oh, there I'm a forester. I doubt if there's a man alive who could follow me there, thank God... ALICE: (Exasperated, pointing after Rich) While you talk, he's gone! MORE: And go he should, if he was the Devil himself, until he broke the law! ROPER: So now you'd give the Devil benefit of law! MORE: Yes. What would you do? Cut a great road through the law to get after the Devil? ROPER: I'd cut down every law in England to do that! MORE: (Roused and excited) Oh? (Advances on Roper) And when the last law was down, and the Devil turned round on you where would you hide, Roper, the laws being flat? (He leaves *1257 him) This country's planted thick with laws from coast to coast man's laws, not God's and if you cut them down and you're just the man to do it d'you really think you would stand upright in the winds that would blow then? (Quietly) Yes, I'd give the Devil benefit of law, for my own safety's sake. ROPER: I have long suspected this; this is the golden calf; the law's your god. MORE: (Wearily) Oh, Roper, you're a fool, God's my god... (Rather bitterly) But I find him rather too (Very bitterly) subtle... I don't know where he is nor what he wants. ROPER: My God wants service, to the end and unremitting; nothing else! MORE: (Dryly) Are you sure that's God! He sounds like Moloch. But indeed it may be God And whoever hunts for me, Roper, God or Devil, will find me hiding in the thickets of the law! And I'll hide my daughter with me! Not hoist her up the mainmast of your seagoing principles! They put about too nimbly! (Exit More. They all look after him). Pgs. 65-67, A MAN FOR ALL SEASONS A Play in Two Acts, Robert Bolt, Random House, New York, 1960. Linley E. Pearson, Atty. Gen. of Indiana, Indianapolis, for defendants. Childs v. Duckworth, 509 F. Supp. 1254, 1256 (N.D. Ind. 1981) aff'd, 705 F.2d 915 (7th Cir. 1983)

  4. "Meanwhile small- and mid-size firms are getting squeezed and likely will not survive unless they become a boutique firm." I've been a business attorney in small, and now mid-size firm for over 30 years, and for over 30 years legal consultants have been preaching this exact same mantra of impending doom for small and mid-sized firms -- verbatim. This claim apparently helps them gin up merger opportunities from smaller firms who become convinced that they need to become larger overnight. The claim that large corporations are interested in cost-saving and efficiency has likewise been preached for decades, and is likewise bunk. If large corporations had any real interest in saving money they wouldn't use large law firms whose rates are substantially higher than those of high-quality mid-sized firms.

  5. The family is the foundation of all human government. That is the Grand Design. Modern governments throw off this Design and make bureaucratic war against the family, as does Hollywood and cultural elitists such as third wave feminists. Since WWII we have been on a ship of fools that way, with both the elite and government and their social engineering hacks relentlessly attacking the very foundation of social order. And their success? See it in the streets of Fergusson, on the food stamp doles (mostly broken families)and in the above article. Reject the Grand Design for true social function, enter the Glorious State to manage social dysfunction. Our Brave New World will be a prison camp, and we will welcome it as the only way to manage given the anarchy without it.

ADVERTISEMENT