ILNews

Fund supports diversity in profession

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A celebration of former Indiana Chief Justice Randall Shepard on Thursday set the stage for the launch of a fund in his name that will continue his legacy of promoting diversity.

Several hundred people attended a gala in Shepard’s honor that also included announcement of the creation of the Randall T. Shepard Fund for Diversity in the Legal Profession, sponsored by the Indiana Bar Foundation.

The fund will further efforts that Shepard championed. Those include diversity initiatives of state and local bar associations and supporting the goals of the Indiana Conference for Legal Education Opportunity and those of the Indiana Supreme Court’s Commission on Race and Gender Fairness.

The ICELO program annually supports an incoming law school class of about 30 fellows with stipends, mentoring and networking opportunities. Shepard urged creation of the program, which was signed into law in 1997 by former Gov. Frank O’Bannon.

Indiana Bar Foundation president Charles Dunlap said a fundraising goal of $150,000 has been established. Former Supreme Court Justice Myra Selby, now a partner with Ice Miller, and Rod Morgan, past president of the Indiana Bar Association, are co-chairing the fundraising drive.

“This fund is an inspiring tribute to someone who has done so much to open the doors to the profession,” said Selby, who served with Shepard on the bench from 1995-2000 and now chairs the Commission on Race and Gender Fairness.

Morgan, a partner at Bingham Greenebaum Doll, said the fund in Shepard’s name was fitting. He said Shepard’s record “shows his commitment to making our legal system better in the state of Indiana.”

Shepard said Thursday that he was humbled by an honor that will further his legacy of promoting diversity.

“To gather with a purpose beyond tribute – that of building our profession’s long-term commitment to equal opportunity – likewise states a powerful message about Indiana lawyers,” he said.

“Indiana’s legal profession needn’t stare down at its shoes and shuffle when people talk about lawyers. Indiana lawyers have earned the right to look our fellow citizens straight on and say, ‘We have done what it lies within us to do,’” Shepard said.

Along with Selby and Morgan, numerous colleagues paid tribute to Shepard on Thursday. Among them: Margaret Marshall, retired chief justice of the Massachusetts Supreme Court; emcees John Tinder, U.S. 7th Circuit judge, and Jan Carroll, partner with Barnes & Thornburg; Vanderburgh Superior Judge Margaret Lloyd; former ICLEO fellow and Madison Circuit Judge Rudy Pyle; and C. Erik Chickedantz, president of the Indiana State Bar Association.

“It is an honor and a privilege to manage this fund, which serves as a fitting tribute to Chief Justice Shepard and his longstanding commitment to furthering diversity in the legal profession,” Dunlap said.

Donations to the fund are tax-deductible and may be made by contacting the Indiana Bar Foundation’s director of development at 317-269-7864. Online donations may be made at www.inbf.org.

 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Indiana State Bar Association

Indianapolis Bar Association

Evansville Bar Association

Allen County Bar Association

Indiana Lawyer on Facebook

facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. So that none are misinformed by my posting wihtout a non de plume here, please allow me to state that I am NOT an Indiana licensed attorney, although I am an Indiana resident approved to practice law and represent clients in Indiana's fed court of Nth Dist and before the 7th circuit. I remain licensed in KS, since 1996, no discipline. This must be clarified since the IN court records will reveal that I did sit for and pass the Indiana bar last February. Yet be not confused by the fact that I was so allowed to be tested .... I am not, to be clear in the service of my duty to be absolutely candid about this, I AM NOT a member of the Indiana bar, and might never be so licensed given my unrepented from errors of thought documented in this opinion, at fn2, which likely supports Mr Smith's initial post in this thread: http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-7th-circuit/1592921.html

  2. When I served the State of Kansas as Deputy AG over Consumer Protection & Antitrust for four years, supervising 20 special agents and assistant attorneys general (back before the IBLE denied me the right to practice law in Indiana for not having the right stuff and pretty much crushed my legal career) we had a saying around the office: Resist the lure of the ring!!! It was a take off on Tolkiem, the idea that absolute power (I signed investigative subpoenas as a judge would in many other contexts, no need to show probable cause)could corrupt absolutely. We feared that we would overreach constitutional limits if not reminded, over and over, to be mindful to not do so. Our approach in so challenging one another was Madisonian, as the following quotes from the Father of our Constitution reveal: The essence of Government is power; and power, lodged as it must be in human hands, will ever be liable to abuse. We are right to take alarm at the first experiment upon our liberties. I believe there are more instances of the abridgement of freedom of the people by gradual and silent encroachments by those in power than by violent and sudden usurpations. Liberty may be endangered by the abuse of liberty, but also by the abuse of power. All men having power ought to be mistrusted. -- James Madison, Federalist Papers and other sources: http://www.constitution.org/jm/jm_quotes.htm RESIST THE LURE OF THE RING ALL YE WITH POLITICAL OR JUDICIAL POWER!

  3. My dear Mr Smith, I respect your opinions and much enjoy your posts here. We do differ on our view of the benefits and viability of the American Experiment in Ordered Liberty. While I do agree that it could be better, and that your points in criticism are well taken, Utopia does indeed mean nowhere. I think Madison, Jefferson, Adams and company got it about as good as it gets in a fallen post-Enlightenment social order. That said, a constitution only protects the citizens if it is followed. We currently have a bevy of public officials and judicial agents who believe that their subjectivism, their personal ideology, their elitist fears and concerns and cause celebs trump the constitutions of our forefathers. This is most troubling. More to follow in the next post on that subject.

  4. Yep I am not Bryan Brown. Bryan you appear to be a bigger believer in the Constitution than I am. Were I still a big believer then I might be using my real name like you. Personally, I am no longer a fan of secularism. I favor the confessional state. In religious mattes, it seems to me that social diversity is chaos and conflict, while uniformity is order and peace.... secularism has been imposed by America on other nations now by force and that has not exactly worked out very well.... I think the American historical experiment with disestablishmentarianism is withering on the vine before our eyes..... Since I do not know if that is OK for an officially licensed lawyer to say, I keep the nom de plume.

  5. I am compelled to announce that I am not posting under any Smith monikers here. That said, the post below does have a certain ring to it that sounds familiar to me: http://www.catholicnewworld.com/cnwonline/2014/0907/cardinal.aspx

ADVERTISEMENT