Gold medal dreams

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Fifty-two years after trying to get on the U.S. Olympic men’s track and field team, Stephen Cohen is still going for gold.

The Munster attorney tried for a spot on the shot put crew in 1964, but an injury kept him out of contention. Life moved on, but he stayed close to sports. He played basketball on a team while he furthered his legal studies at Cambridge University in England, and was a regular on the racquetball courts while he was raising a family and building his practice.

cohen-stephen-15col.jpg Stephen Cohen (Photo submitted)

At the age of 48, he picked up the shot put again. Most recently, he was in Grand Rapids, Michigan, where he competed in the 2016 USATF Masters Outdoor Championships. He took home the bronze in the 75 to 79 age group.

“I’ve never lost my passion for it,” Cohen said.

If he had gone to the 1964 Olympics in Japan as part of the United States team, he still likely would have followed his father’s footsteps into practicing law in Lake County, but he would have had more notoriety. It’s always nice to be called an Olympian, he mused.

Cohen is part of a small cohort of the Indiana legal community whose excellence in athletics got them to the cusp of the Olympics. They trained several days a week for many years to increase their endurance and hone their skills with the singular focus of getting to the Olympic trials.

little-jonathan-15col.jpg Jonathan Little (Photo submitted)

Jonathan Little, partner at Saeed & Little LLP in Indianapolis, ran for a slot on the U.S. marathon team for the 2008 Olympics in Beijing. Megan Ryther at Ice Miller LLP competed as a high school student for the 1996 U.S. Olympic women’s swim team.

Jordan Kyle, a 2016 graduate of Indiana University Robert H. McKinney School of Law, decided to intertwine his J.D. work with training for the 2016 Olympic marathon trials.

They can all remember the tryouts. The atmosphere, the feeling and, of course, their finishing times, or in the case of Cohen, the distance of the throw, are readily recalled. And for the most part, they all echo Kyle’s assessment: “It was an incredible amount of work, but I’m glad I did it.”

A bag of sandwiches

Little arrived in New York in November 2007 ready to run. The 26.2-mile course started in Times Square then settled into numerous loops around Central Park.

“Stupidly my goal was to get on the team,” he said.

Like Kyle, Little laced up his running shoes again when he enrolled at the University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Law in 2004. And until 2010, he ran 4,500 miles or more every year, picking up a sponsorship from Brooks Running Co. that included, in his words, all the shoes he could eat.

He ran 17 to 20 miles every weekday morning and followed with another 5 miles in the afternoon. Heading to class, he always carried a bag of sandwiches to get the daily 3,000 to 5,000 calories he needed.

After graduation, he went to Arizona to take a job in the prosecutor’s office in Flagstaff and, primarily, to join the running community there.

kyle-jordan-15col.jpg Jordan Kyle (Photo submitted)

In New York, his routine was disrupted. He did not eat enough before the race and during the race, he was not able settle into an even pace. By the 16-mile marker, he knew he wasn’t going to Beijing. He finished with a time of 2 hours and 33 minutes.

Explaining what it was like running those last 10 miles with the knowledge his goal was toast, Little was direct. “It sucks,” he said.

Tried to muscle one out

Cohen had just finished his law degree at Vanderbilt University Law School when he arrived at the 1964 National Amateur Athletic Union track and field championship. In those days, the AAU contests served as the Olympic trials.

He had taped two fingers together (which shot putters were allowed to do then) and took a dose of Novocain but his throwing hand still hurt. He had torn the joint on his third finger trying to “muscle one out” during an AAU meet in Kentucky just prior to the championship.

The pain kept him from throwing a personal best of 60 feet and knocked him into a 10th place finish.

Surgery in 1990 finally repaired the joint and got Cohen back to throwing the shot put and, about 10 years later, the discus. Instead of talking about retiring, he advocates for all attorneys to get on the track or in the gym or do whatever sport they like.

“I think too many lawyers get so involved in their practice that they forget there’s life outside the practice of law,” he said.

Just wanting to get to trials

Ryther remembers her Olympic trials as “pretty overwhelming” while Kyle recalls his as “horribly hot.” Both had just wanted to get to tryouts but neither expected to make the U.S. team.

ryther-megan-15col.jpg Megan Ryther (Photo submitted)

Just a 16-year-old high school student from Texas, Ryther traveled to Indianapolis to compete in the Olympic trials for the 800-meter freestyle. Having swam, lifted weights, and ran up and down stairs nearly every day plus Thanksgiving and Christmas, she came into the trials with a personal best of about 8 minutes, 49 seconds.

Ryther swam the 16 laps and although she finished less than 30 seconds behind the winner, she was still in 26th place. Her final time was 9:00.45 minutes.

Kyle finished the trial marathon with a time of 2 hours and 38 minutes, 10 minutes off his personal best. However, the February day he ran in the trials in Los Angeles, the temperature climbed to a record-breaking 75 degrees and running on the street through the city, Kyle estimated the course temperate broke 80 degrees. The heat forced him to quit running and walk six times.

He chose to train for the marathon because he felt that was the best chance he had to get to the Olympic trials. The event required endurance rather than speed.

To prepare for the heat, Kyle regularly logged several miles bundled in a coat, gloves, tights and a hat. He was running 100 miles or more each week and kept his energy up by eating a lot of frutis and vegetables and catching 20-minute power naps in the law library.

Occasionally he did think about quitting and forgoing his dream of competing in the Olympics. But then he would realize he did not want to look back on this time with regret.

In the aftermath of the trials, Little, Kyle and Ryther have not let their sports gear gather dust.

Like Cohen, Ryther still competes. After high school, she turned her attention to open water swimming and “very, very briefly” considered trying out when the sport was first included in the Olympics in 2008. But she decided to focus instead on finishing her J.D. and MBA at Marquette University.

She loves the sport and has competed in a handful of world championships around the world. Recently, she battled the waves at a competition in the Cayman Islands.

Kyle and Little still run. The former is eyeing the trials for the 2020 Olympics and the latter is planning to run in the Monumental Marathon in Indianapolis in the fall.

“I’m happy,” Little said of his time running. “In the end, I think it was a positive experience.”•


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. The appellate court just said doctors can be sued for reporting child abuse. The most dangerous form of child abuse with the highest mortality rate of any form of child abuse (between 6% and 9% according to the below listed studies). Now doctors will be far less likely to report this form of dangerous child abuse in Indiana. If you want to know what this is, google the names Lacey Spears, Julie Conley (and look at what happened when uninformed judges returned that child against medical advice), Hope Ybarra, and Dixie Blanchard. Here is some really good reporting on what this allegation was: Here are the two research papers: 25% of sibling are dead in that second study. 25%!!! Unbelievable ruling. Chilling. Wrong.

  2. MELISA EVA VALUE INVESTMENT Greetings to you from Melisa Eva Value Investment. We offer Business and Personal loans, it is quick and easy and hence can be availed without any hassle. We do not ask for any collateral or guarantors while approving these loans and hence these loans require minimum documentation. We offer great and competitive interest rates of 2% which do not weigh you down too much. These loans have a comfortable pay-back period. Apply today by contacting us on E-mail: WE DO NOT ASK FOR AN UPFRONT FEE. BEWARE OF SCAMMERS AND ONLINE FRAUD.

  3. Mr. Levin says that the BMV engaged in misconduct--that the BMV (or, rather, someone in the BMV) knew Indiana motorists were being overcharged fees but did nothing to correct the situation. Such misconduct, whether engaged in by one individual or by a group, is called theft (defined as knowingly or intentionally exerting unauthorized control over the property of another person with the intent to deprive the other person of the property's value or use). Theft is a crime in Indiana (as it still is in most of the civilized world). One wonders, then, why there have been no criminal prosecutions of BMV officials for this theft? Government misconduct doesn't occur in a vacuum. An individual who works for or oversees a government agency is responsible for the misconduct. In this instance, somebody (or somebodies) with the BMV, at some time, knew Indiana motorists were being overcharged. What's more, this person (or these people), even after having the error of their ways pointed out to them, did nothing to fix the problem. Instead, the overcharges continued. Thus, the taxpayers of Indiana are also on the hook for the millions of dollars in attorneys fees (for both sides; the BMV didn't see fit to avail itself of the services of a lawyer employed by the state government) that had to be spent in order to finally convince the BMV that stealing money from Indiana motorists was a bad thing. Given that the BMV official(s) responsible for this crime continued their misconduct, covered it up, and never did anything until the agency reached an agreeable settlement, it seems the statute of limitations for prosecuting these folks has not yet run. I hope our Attorney General is paying attention to this fiasco and is seriously considering prosecution. Indiana, the state that works . . . for thieves.

  4. I'm glad that attorney Carl Hayes, who represented the BMV in this case, is able to say that his client "is pleased to have resolved the issue". Everyone makes mistakes, even bureaucratic behemoths like Indiana's BMV. So to some extent we need to be forgiving of such mistakes. But when those mistakes are going to cost Indiana taxpayers millions of dollars to rectify (because neither plaintiff's counsel nor Mr. Hayes gave freely of their services, and the BMV, being a state-funded agency, relies on taxpayer dollars to pay these attorneys their fees), the agency doesn't have a right to feel "pleased to have resolved the issue". One is left wondering why the BMV feels so pleased with this resolution? The magnitude of the agency's overcharges might suggest to some that, perhaps, these errors were more than mere oversight. Could this be why the agency is so "pleased" with this resolution? Will Indiana motorists ever be assured that the culture of incompetence (if not worse) that the BMV seems to have fostered is no longer the status quo? Or will even more "overcharges" and lawsuits result? It's fairly obvious who is really "pleased to have resolved the issue", and it's not Indiana's taxpayers who are on the hook for the legal fees generated in these cases.

  5. From the article's fourth paragraph: "Her work underscores the blurry lines in Russia between the government and businesses . . ." Obviously, the author of this piece doesn't pay much attention to the "blurry lines" between government and businesses that exist in the United States. And I'm not talking only about Trump's alleged conflicts of interest. When lobbyists for major industries (pharmaceutical, petroleum, insurance, etc) have greater access to this country's elected representatives than do everyday individuals (i.e., voters), then I would say that the lines between government and business in the United States are just as blurry, if not more so, than in Russia.