ILNews

Gov. Pence turns to legal community for board appointments

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A litigation attorney for the Indiana Department of Child Services, Luke Britt, has been appointed as the Indiana Public Access Counselor.

Gov. Mike Pence announced Britt’s appointment Thursday, Aug. 22. In addition, the governor tapped other members of the legal community to serve on the Indiana Board of Tax Review and the Parole Board.

Charles Miller, assistant supervisor with the Marion County Prosecutor’s Office, will serve on the Parole Board. A graduate of Indiana University Robert H. McKinney School of Law, he will serve through June 30, 2015.

Ted Holaday, senior administrative law judge at the Board of Tax Review since 2002, and John Elrod, practicing attorney, were both named to the Indiana Board of Tax Review.

Holaday was a deputy Attorney General from 1977 to 2004. He is also a graduate of the IU McKinney School of Law. His term runs through Jan. 1, 2016.

A graduate of Indiana University Maurer School of Law, Elrod is currently a partner at Elrod & Mascher, LLC, in Indianapolis. His term begins Oct. 1 and continues through Jan. 1, 2015.

Pence also re-appointed Betsy Brand to the Board of Tax Review. Her term runs through Jan. 1, 2015.

In his new role, Britt will provide advice and assistance concerning Indiana’s public access law to private citizens, government officials and state employees. Prior to joining DCS, he worked at the Indiana State Department of Health and was an attorney at R. Lee Money law firm in Greenwood.

He received his law degree from the University of Detroit Mercy School of Law. His term runs through June 30, 2015.

Britt is replacing Joe Hoage who will become the chief legal counsel for the Indiana Department of Natural Resources.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Indiana State Bar Association

Indianapolis Bar Association

Evansville Bar Association

Allen County Bar Association

Indiana Lawyer on Facebook

facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Such things are no more elections than those in the late, unlamented Soviet Union.

  2. It appears the police and prosecutors are allowed to change the rules halfway through the game to suit themselves. I am surprised that the congress has not yet eliminated the right to a trial in cases involving any type of forensic evidence. That would suit their foolish law and order police state views. I say we eliminate the statute of limitations for crimes committed by members of congress and other government employees. Of course they would never do that. They are all corrupt cowards!!!

  3. Poor Judge Brown probably thought that by slavishly serving the godz of the age her violations of 18th century concepts like due process and the rule of law would be overlooked. Mayhaps she was merely a Judge ahead of her time?

  4. in a lawyer discipline case Judge Brown, now removed, was presiding over a hearing about a lawyer accused of the supposedly heinous ethical violation of saying the words "Illegal immigrant." (IN re Barker) http://www.in.gov/judiciary/files/order-discipline-2013-55S00-1008-DI-429.pdf .... I wonder if when we compare the egregious violations of due process by Judge Brown, to her chiding of another lawyer for politically incorrectness, if there are any conclusions to be drawn about what kind of person, what kind of judge, what kind of apparatchik, is busy implementing the agenda of political correctness and making off-limits legit advocacy about an adverse party in a suit whose illegal alien status is relevant? I am just asking the question, the reader can make own conclsuion. Oh wait-- did I use the wrong adjective-- let me rephrase that, um undocumented alien?

  5. of course the bigger questions of whether or not the people want to pay for ANY bussing is off limits, due to the Supreme Court protecting the people from DEMOCRACY. Several decades hence from desegregation and bussing plans and we STILL need to be taking all this taxpayer money to combat mostly-imagined "discrimination" in the most obviously failed social program of the postwar period.

ADVERTISEMENT