The governor today fired the state's top utility regulator, citing ethical concerns about how a former Administrative
Law Judge presided over cases involving a regulated energy company leading up to his taking a job there.
But even more significant for the Indiana legal community is how Gov. Mitch Daniels’ actions are telling ALJs that
the spirit of a mandatory one-year cooling-off rule applies to them, and they should be careful about considering outside
employment while presiding as neutral parties over these administrative matters.
Terminating David Lott Hardy as Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission chairman, the governor specifically pointed to the
reason being the recent departure of general counsel Scott Storms who took a job in late September as a lawyer in Duke Energy’s
regulatory division.
The attorney admitted to the practice of law in 1989 was the agency’s chief legal advisor and served as ALJ, and the
governor said his taking a job somewhere directly involved in cases he’d recently presided over raised the “appearance
of impropriety.”
The governor’s general counsel David Pippen sent a memo to all agency heads outlining an internal review that found
Storms had been communicating with Duke about a job even while he was presiding over administrative hearings concerning the
energy company.
"Additionally, the agency head was aware of the communications and did not remove the lawyer from matters for which
the lawyer was now conflicted,” Pippen said in his memo, saying that Daniels has directed that administrative opinions
over which Storms presided be reopened and reviewed “to ensure no undue influence was exerted in the decisions.”
In the memo, Pippen wrote that the governor considers the one-year cooling off period to apply to anyone at the ALJ level,
and that this matter specifically has been referred to the Inspector General to determine if any laws were broken or whether
misinformation was presented to the state Ethics Commission.
Though it’s not outlined which Duke cases are at issue, Storms had presided over a handful of matters involving Duke
– most significantly one relating to cost overruns at the company’s Edwardsport generating plant. After questions
arose late last month about Storms’ departure and new position, Duke said that he and the company had previously sought
an advisory opinion from the state ethics commission on whether Storms would be subject to that one-year cooling-off period
before being allowed to take a job at Duke. The commission found it didn’t apply because Storms wasn’t directly
involved in the decision-making, but the panel also found that he couldn’t be involved as an attorney at Duke in any
matters he might have presided over while working as an ALJ for the state agency.
But with this announcement, the fallout worsened as Duke said it was placing Storms on administrative leave “pending
the completion of a full evaluation.” The company did the same with its president and chief executive officer of Indiana
operations, Mike Reed, who had started with Duke in June after serving as commissioner of the Indiana Department of Transportation
and previously serving as executive director of the IURC under Daniels from 2006 to 2009.
Hearing about the IURC-specific issues, Indianapolis attorney and longtime legal ethics advisor John Conlon said this goes
to a broader issue about how state agency attorneys also function as ALJs and he said it’s ironic in this case that
“the appearance of impropriety” is being cited by the governor.
“I think that there is an inherent conflict when an attorney who works for a state department also functions as a supposedly
neutral ALJ,” he said. “Unfortunately, these types of situations go on routinely throughout state government.”
Conlon said he wouldn’t be surprised if disciplinary charges are explored, but that it would be up to someone to file
a complaint before the Disciplinary Commission for that to happen. No formal disciplinary actions are listed on the state’s
appellate court docket for Storms, and the commission is prohibited from speaking about any issue that may or may not be pending.
As part of the announcement today, Pippen reiterated that no ALJ who presides over information-gathering or order-drafting
matters should engage in communications with regulated industries regarding potential jobs without recusing him or herself
from cases involving that industry.
Daniels immediately appointed as the new IURC chairman Jim Atterholt, who serves on the commission and is the state’s
former insurance commissioner.
Indianapolis Business Journal reporter Chris O’Malley contributed to this story.














vagueness cannot challenged, so let's write all laws vaguely and throw the constitution out the window.Even if the court is operating under a particular law, if they don't it they will change it to their liking. What a joke!!!
Two convictions becomes one conviction with exactly the same sentence, only it is not clear wheter or not that sentence will be 18 months, 120 months or 138 months. Actually if the guns were in a home, whether or not they were his, he is protected under the 2nd amendment. Jurors need to learn the law and the constitution before judging others. The cour5ts need to do this as well.
With all due respect, Rick, I think you probably would be making a mistake by going to law school. The job market for attorneys is so saturated, you may well find yourself unemployed and with a lot of debt. You mention law would be a good supplement to your skills. True. But employers unfortunately don't value that. You will find that a law degree may well pigeonhole you into an attorney slot and limit career options. If you have a good job now I would hold onto that. As an attorney, you may well end up making less with the aforementioned debt.
Jack, I was only responding to bill's comment of tying everybody in government together. I agree with you though, it takes one bad apple to ruin the bunch.. As in any profession. What's truly unfair is when somebody violates someone's trust and takes complete advantage of someone
John’s comment is unfair. The majority of attorneys can be trusted. Unfortunately, all it takes is one greedy, unscrupulous, immoral attorney to jade the public.