A Marion County grand jury has returned an eight-count indictment against OmniSource Corp., accusing the metal recycling
powerhouse of racketeering and receiving stolen property.
OmniSource, a unit of Fort Wayne-based Steel Dynamics Inc., is charged with buying stolen cars, car parts, boats, gutters,
wiring and other items as scrap metal prices climbed between June 2007 and May 2009.
In a statement, OmniSource president Mark Millett called the allegations "unfounded," saying the company is an
industry leader in "anti-theft training and law enforcement cooperation." The company hired more than 50 Indianapolis
Metropolitan Police Department officers to help detect and deter metal theft.
"This indictment of OmniSource is not only unfair to the company but an insult to the IMPD police officers who ... did
their part to stop metal thefts in Marion County,” he said in the statement.
Officers from the IMPD, FBI, Indiana State Police and other agencies raided the six Indianapolis scrap yards operated by
OmniSource in February 2009, collecting evidence and seizing property and more than $277,000. The raids were the culmination
of a year-long undercover investigation.
The grand jury returned the 16-page indictment Oct. 22, and it was filed in Marion Circuit Court on Monday.
OmniSource is charged with three counts of corrupt business influence and five counts of attempted receipt of stolen property.
The indictment details dozens of allegations, which Millett said the company will "aggressively" defend itself against.
This month, the company sued Marion County Prosecutor Carl Brizzi, seeking the return of the seized cash. OmniSource said the
investigation was a sham intended to raise Brizzi’s political profile.
As IBJ reported in April, the Prosecutor’s Office missed a deadline to file forfeiture paperwork, likely
paving the way for OmniSource to reclaim the money.














The court of appeals not only tries to rewrite or interpret the law to suit their fancy, now they choose play stupid as well. Every consideration must be given to pro se litigants, who are not held to the same standards as attorneys, as stated by,SCOTUS. I assume they didn't have a lawyer, since one wasn't mentioned and I strongly suggest thatb the rest of the, origional petitioners get back in there and fight for their rights.
the irony of situations like this is that the clients whom conour cheated are the ones who should be pulling hardest for him to remain free and keep his law license, so they have some hopes of him paying back. really bury the guy deep and then there will be little hope of restitution
Qualified immunity, means that if you wear a badge, you are exempt from law and free to do anything you please! The courts will back badge toting individuals, because they think they are above the law as well. They think, they have judicial immunity, they do not.
Deeply, deeply concerned? I'll bet if it was the judge's money that had been swindled we'd see deep concern with actual consequences. First a Ponzi scheme, then a shell game with the assets…c'mon, hasn't Conour abused the judicial system and his clients long enough? I say enough already.
Wow, just wow.