ILNews

Habeas proceeding stays execution

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Indiana Lawyer Rehearing

A federal judge has postponed the April execution of a St. Joseph County man convicted of killing his wife, her ex-husband, and her son.

U.S. Chief Judge Philip Simon granted a motion for stay of execution Jan. 27 for Wayne D. Kubsch, convicted of committing the 1998 murders in order to collect on his wife’s life insurance policy. He was originally convicted in 2000 but the conviction was reversed on appeal, and he was convicted again in 2005 and sentenced to death. The Indiana Supreme Court upheld that decision and death sentence last year, and in January the court ordered that his execution occur April 6.

Judge Simon’s decision gives Kubsch a chance to file a habeas corpus petition by April 27, with briefing and state records to be filed in federal court by August and traverse by the end of November. Oral arguments would also be held.

 

Rehearing: "Supreme Court sets execution date" IL Jan. 19-Feb. 1, 2011

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Enough is enough
    There has to be a way for the justice system to bypass all these nonsense appeals when there is absolutely ZERO reasonable doubt. The drawn out process of appeals for the obviously guilty must be addressed. This man is a POS who needs to go. Now.775

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Is it possible to amend an order for child support due to false paternity?

  2. He did not have an "unlicensed handgun" in his pocket. Firearms are not licensed in Indiana. He apparently possessed a handgun without a license to carry, but it's not the handgun that is licensed (or registered).

  3. Once again, Indiana's legislature proves how friendly it is to monopolies. This latest bill by Hershman demonstrates the lengths Indiana's representatives are willing to go to put big business's (especially utilities') interests above those of everyday working people. Maassal argues that if the technology (solar) is so good, it will be able to compete on its own. Too bad he doesn't feel the same way about the industries he represents. Instead, he wants to cut the small credit consumers get for using solar in order to "add a 'level of certainty'" to his industry. I haven't heard of or seen such a blatant money-grab by an industry since the days when our federal, state, and local governments were run by the railroad. Senator Hershman's constituents should remember this bill the next time he runs for office, and they should penalize him accordingly.

  4. From his recent appearance on WRTV to this story here, Frank is everywhere. Couldn't happen to a nicer guy, although he should stop using Eric Schnauffer for his 7th Circuit briefs. They're not THAT hard.

  5. They learn our language prior to coming here. My grandparents who came over on the boat, had to learn English and become familiarize with Americas customs and culture. They are in our land now, speak ENGLISH!!

ADVERTISEMENT