ILNews

Hamilton Superior judge arrested out-of-state for DWI

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Hamilton Superior Judge William J. Hughes was arrested for drunk driving last week while vacationing in the Outer Banks of North Carolina.

The 55-year-old judge has been on the bench since 1988. He sent out a news release on Monday night about the incident. Judge Hughes was arrested at 5:45 p.m. Oct. 27 and charged with misdemeanor driving while impaired and a traffic infraction of driving left of center, according to his statement.
 

hughes-william-mug Hughes

Though the Currituck County Sheriff’s Office could not provide any information or forward a copy of the police report, an official with the Currituck County Clerk’s Office said a uniform citation document and police affidavit shows that Judge Hughes had a blood alcohol content of .13, nearly twice as high as the state’s legal limit of .08.

“It says on the affidavit that he traveled left of center twice, and turned his turn signal on a half of mile before the turn,” Currituck County Assistant Clerk of Courts Debbie Basnight said. The incident happened near North Carolina Highway 12 and Seabird Way in Corolla along the northern Outer Banks. An officer also reported a “light odor” of alcohol on the judge’s breath, but observed that he was polite and cooperative during the incident, according to Basnight. An automatic 30-day license revocation has also been implemented against Judge Hughes, she said.

The charges are pending in The General Court of Justice, District Court Division in Currituck County, N.C. The judge was released on an unsecured bond and the court docket shows his initial court appearance scheduled for 9:30 a.m. Jan. 24, 2011.

Judge Hughes has retained Teague & Glover in Elizabeth City, N.C., on the criminal charges, and attorney Danny Glover Jr. did not return a phone call from Indiana Lawyer today. Indianapolis attorneys Kevin McGoff and James Bell with Bingham McHale are representing Judge Hughes on the judicial discipline aspects.

“I apologize to my family, my friends, my colleagues and the general public for any embarrassment that my arrest has caused them,” Judge Hughes wrote in his statement, noting that he will not be making any more public comments about this pending matter.

Judge Hughes does not have any discipline history with the Indiana system. He has presided over many high-profile cases that most recently include the Carmel High School basketball hazing case, former money manager Marcus Schrenker’s case, as well as annexation and other cases that have gone as high as the Indiana Supreme Court. He was one of three finalists for the state’s Court of Appeals in 2007. the judge's current term is set to expire at the end of 2012.

On the morning of Oct. 28, Judge Hughes self-reported his out-of-state arrest to the Indiana Judicial Qualifications Commission. Generally, any disciplinary charges come once the criminal case is complete. The Indiana Supreme Court would make any final decision on discipline once that process concludes. In the past, other trial judges who’ve faced drunken-driving charges – including Marion Superior Judge John F. Hanley in 2007 and Allen Circuit Judge Thomas Felts in 2008 – have received public reprimands for similar conduct.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Really?
    I am shocked that comments of condemnation come from members of the bar. We complain about juries failing to honor the presumption of innocence. Yet some do the same thing here. Our knowledge of this judge is irrelevant. He is presumed innocent. Let's not simply pay lip service to the concept.
  • Equal b4 law
    Is not the judge entitled to apreumption of innocence like evevrybody else? Cut him some slack.
  • Think before you wish
    Jim, I understand your point. I don't know if this specific judge has been fair and reasonable or malicious in the past. Do you really want a judge who is perfect and white as the driven snow judging you. Such a judge may not understand what it means to be human. We don't want a perfect person affected with any degree of Asperger sitting on the bench. If anything, we need judges to be highly experienced, wise, been around the real world a time or two and be impaths.
  • Oust the Judge
    It is time to oust this guy from his position as judge. I wonder how many times he has sentenced others for even less blood alcohol content for DUI. This continues to be a trend of corruption and lack of sound and fair judgical purdance in Hamilton County, from the prosecuitors, lawyers, and the judges. But again justice here is not about what is right or wrong, fair or just, truth or deception, but all about how you "Play the Game" and spend the money.

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Indiana State Bar Association

    Indianapolis Bar Association

    Evansville Bar Association

    Allen County Bar Association

    Indiana Lawyer on Facebook

    facebook
    ADVERTISEMENT
    Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
    1. It appears the police and prosecutors are allowed to change the rules halfway through the game to suit themselves. I am surprised that the congress has not yet eliminated the right to a trial in cases involving any type of forensic evidence. That would suit their foolish law and order police state views. I say we eliminate the statute of limitations for crimes committed by members of congress and other government employees. Of course they would never do that. They are all corrupt cowards!!!

    2. Poor Judge Brown probably thought that by slavishly serving the godz of the age her violations of 18th century concepts like due process and the rule of law would be overlooked. Mayhaps she was merely a Judge ahead of her time?

    3. in a lawyer discipline case Judge Brown, now removed, was presiding over a hearing about a lawyer accused of the supposedly heinous ethical violation of saying the words "Illegal immigrant." (IN re Barker) http://www.in.gov/judiciary/files/order-discipline-2013-55S00-1008-DI-429.pdf .... I wonder if when we compare the egregious violations of due process by Judge Brown, to her chiding of another lawyer for politically incorrectness, if there are any conclusions to be drawn about what kind of person, what kind of judge, what kind of apparatchik, is busy implementing the agenda of political correctness and making off-limits legit advocacy about an adverse party in a suit whose illegal alien status is relevant? I am just asking the question, the reader can make own conclsuion. Oh wait-- did I use the wrong adjective-- let me rephrase that, um undocumented alien?

    4. of course the bigger questions of whether or not the people want to pay for ANY bussing is off limits, due to the Supreme Court protecting the people from DEMOCRACY. Several decades hence from desegregation and bussing plans and we STILL need to be taking all this taxpayer money to combat mostly-imagined "discrimination" in the most obviously failed social program of the postwar period.

    5. You can put your photos anywhere you like... When someone steals it they know it doesn't belong to them. And, a man getting a divorce is automatically not a nice guy...? That's ridiculous. Since when is need of money a conflict of interest? That would mean that no one should have a job unless they are already financially solvent without a job... A photographer is also under no obligation to use a watermark (again, people know when a photo doesn't belong to them) or provide contact information. Hey, he didn't make it easy for me to pay him so I'll just take it! Well heck, might as well walk out of the grocery store with a cart full of food because the lines are too long and you don't find that convenient. "Only in Indiana." Oh, now you're passing judgement on an entire state... What state do you live in? I need to characterize everyone in your state as ignorant and opinionated. And the final bit of ignorance; assuming a photo anyone would want is lucky and then how much does your camera have to cost to make it a good photo, in your obviously relevant opinion?

    ADVERTISEMENT