ILNews

Hammerle on ... 'American Hustle' leads favorites for 2014 Oscars

Robert Hammerle
February 12, 2014
Keywords
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

bob hammerle movie reviewsThe Oscars take place March 2, so it’s time to humiliate myself and make predictions. Then again, what would cause you to place your money on the opinion of a criminal defense lawyer for God’s sake? My idol has always been Atticus Finch, and didn’t his innocent client get convicted in “To Kill a Mockingbird?”

BEST PICTURE – “American Hustle”

Simply stated, director David O. Russell had the rug pulled out from underneath him last year when his brilliant “Silver Linings Playbook” was ignored, and I can’t see them doing that to him two years in a row. Yes, “12 Years a Slave,” “Dallas Buyers Club” and “Gravity” are equally deserving, and no one would applaud more enthusiastically if “Nebraska” or “Philomena” won. Yet my instincts tell me that it has to go to Russell’s film.

BEST ACTOR – Chiwetel Ejiofor

This comes down to Matthew McConaughey’s performance in “Dallas Buyers Club” and Ejiofor in “12 Years a Slave.” His gigantic performance should always remind you of what slavery was really like despite the loveable Mammy in “Gone with the Wind” (1939). The British-born son of Nigerian parents deserves this, and what a fine moment it would be.

BEST ACTRESS – Cate Blanchett

Though Ms. Blanchett’s character in “Blue Jasmine” was nearly as unlikeable as Leonardo DiCaprio’s loathsome character in “The Wolf of Wall Street, she made you reach the point where you almost cared for her, and I’ve got to think she will grab the prize. But don’t count out Amy Adams, who is lurking in the shadows with “American Hustle.”

BEST SUPPORTING ACTOR - Jared Leto

This prize belongs to Leto. His only real competition is Barkhad Abdi, the beleaguered pirate in “Captain Phillips.” However, I think Leto’s portrayal of a dying transvestite in “Dallas Buyers Club” wins hands down.

BEST SUPPORTING ACTRESS – June Squibb

This award comes down to either Lupita Nyong’o for her heartbreaking performance in “12 Years a Slave” or Squibb as Bruce Dern’s ornery 84-year-old wife with an attitude in “Nebraska.” I really wish it could be a tie, but give it to Squibb.

BEST DIRECTOR – David O. Russell

Here’s to you, Russell. Again, you can’t leave him standing at the door for two spectacular works two years in a row.

ANIMATED FEATURE – “Frozen”

This one was as easy to pick as Leto for Best Supporting Actor.

FILM EDITING – “American Hustle”

I really don’t have the expertise to make a meaningful selection in this category, but history has tended to show that the Best Picture winner also wins the Oscar for film editing.

CINEMATOGRAPHY – “Gravity”

There is only one winner in this category, and it begins several awards for this spectacularly visual film.

DOCUMENTARY FEATURE – “20 Feet from Stardom”

A great story about backup singers told with provocative thoughts from Bruce Springsteen, David Bowie and others. The backup singers in this sterling film deserve to be seen at the front of the stage. (Please ignore the sad fact that I haven’t seen the other nominees!)

COSTUME DESIGN – “American Hustle”

Our boys looked good in this film, but no one will ever forget the gowns worn by Amy Adams and Jennifer Lawrence.

MAKEUP AND HAIRSTYLING – “Dallas Buyers Club”

Did you see the makeup and hairstyling done to Leto in his captivating performance? I did, and I would guess that even some of those adamant in their opposition to same-sex marriage secretly found him attractive.

VISUAL EFFECTS – “Gravity”

This is really a contest between “Gravity” and “The Hobbit: Deosolation of Smaug.” While it wouldn’t disappoint me at all to see “The Hobbit” win, the stunning visual effects in “Gravity” dealt with a reflection of reality, not fantasy. Alfonso Cuaron’s group deserves this Oscar.

ORIGINAL SCORE – “Gravity”

Whether it out-muscles “American Hustle” for the Best Picture Oscar, it has to be the favorite to take home the prize in this category.

ORIGINAL SONG – “Let It Go” from “Frozen”

This also should be a no-brainer.

PRODUCTION DESIGN – “Gravity”

The strength of this film is found in its visuals, and that has to begin with this category.

SOUND EDITING and SOUND MIXING – “The Hobbit: Desolation of Smaug”

Given the legitimate appeal of “Gravity,” I’m clearly going out on a limb here. However, I remember that director Peter Jackson’s team won in these two categories when they remade “King Kong” (2005). Let history repeat itself.

ORIGINAL SCREENPLAY – “Her”

Though I still believe that its mistreatment of women made it a mistake to nominate “Her” for best picture, it clearly stands out in this category. Spike Jonze has written a unique script. Though Bob Nelson is right there with the incredibly engaging “Nebraska,” I think Jonze’s creative ingenuity carries the day despite its weaknesses.

ADAPTED SCREENPLAY – “12 Years a Slave”

The emotional effect and historical significance of “12 Years a Slave” can’t possibly be ignored.

ANIMATED SHORT FILM – “Get a Horse!”

Though the films in this category won’t reach Indianapolis until after my deadline, I’m going out on a limb and picking Disney’s very funny tale about Mickey and Minnie Mouse as they battle Pegleg Pete. If you’ve seen “Frozen,” you’ve already seen this inspired animated film as a lead-in.

LIVE ACTION SHORT FILM - Not here by deadline.

DOCUMENTARY SHORT SUBJECT - Not here at all!

FOREIGN LANGUAGE FILM - ?

While Indianapolis has once again all but ignored foreign films, my biggest disappointment is that neither “Instructions Not Included” from Mexico and “Wajda” from Saudi Arabia are nominees. Maybe their homelands failed to submit them as potential nominations, but they remain extraordinary films that all of you should see. As noted in my earlier reviews, “Instructions Not Included” was the highest grossing Mexican film in the history of this country, and “Wajda” was the first film to be directed by a female Saudi director.

Regardless of who wins in this Oscar race, please remember to see “The Way, Way Back” and “Short Term 12.” To the extent that it matters, they remain two of my favorite films of 2013.•

__________

Robert Hammerle
practices criminal law in Indianapolis. When he is not in the courtroom or working diligently in his Pennsylvania Street office, Bob can likely be found at one of his favorite movie theaters watching and preparing to review the latest films. To read more of his reviews, visit www.bigmouthbobs.com. The opinions expressed are those of the author.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Hello everyone am precious from the united state of America am here to testify in the name of this great man who has brought back happiness into my family after my lover Chris left me for 3years for another woman,i really loved Chris because he was my first love i tried everything within my power to get Chris back to my life but people i met just kept on scamming me and lying to me,Then normally on Saturdays i do go out to make my hair and get some stuff,Then i had people discussing at the saloon if they do listen to there radio well,That there is a program (how i got back my ex)And started talking much about Dr EDDY how this man has helped lots of people in bringing back there lover,So immediately i went close to those ladies i met at the saloon and i explained things to them they said i should try and contact Dr EDDY that he has been the talk of the town and people are really contacting him for help immediately we searched on the internet and read great things about Dr EDDY i now got all Dr EDDY contact instantly at the saloon i gave Dr EDDY a call and i shared my problem with him he just told me not to worry that i should just be happy,He just told me to send him some few details which i did,And then he got back to me that everything would be okay within 36hours i was so happy then Dr EDDY did his work and he did not fail me,My lover Chris came to me in tears and apologized to me for leaving me in deep pain for good 3years,So he decided to prove that he will never leave me for any reason he made me had access to his account and made me his next of kin on all his will,Now the most perfect thing is that he can't spend a minute without seeing me or calling me,Am so grateful to Dr EDDY for bringing back the happiness which i lack for years,Please contact Dr EDDY for help he is a trustworthy man in email is dreddyspiritualtemple@gmail.com or you can call him or whatsapp him with this number...+23408160830324 (1)If you want your ex back. (2) if you always have bad dreams. (3)You want to be promoted in your office. (4)You want women/men to run after you. (5)If you want a child. (6)[You want to be rich. (7)You want to tie your husband/wife to be yours forever. (8)If you need financial assistance. (9)If you want to stop your Divorce. 10)Help bringing people out of prison. (11)Marriage Spells (12)Miracle Spells (13)Beauty Spells (14)PROPHECY CHARM (15)Attraction Spells (16)Evil Eye Spells. (17)Kissing Spell (18)Remove Sickness Spells. (19)ELECTION WINNING SPELLS. (20)SUCCESS IN EXAMS SPELLS. (21) Charm to get who to love you. CONTACT:dreddyspiritualtemple@gmail.com

  2. The appellate court just said doctors can be sued for reporting child abuse. The most dangerous form of child abuse with the highest mortality rate of any form of child abuse (between 6% and 9% according to the below listed studies). Now doctors will be far less likely to report this form of dangerous child abuse in Indiana. If you want to know what this is, google the names Lacey Spears, Julie Conley (and look at what happened when uninformed judges returned that child against medical advice), Hope Ybarra, and Dixie Blanchard. Here is some really good reporting on what this allegation was: http://media.star-telegram.com/Munchausenmoms/ Here are the two research papers: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0145213487900810 http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0145213403000309 25% of sibling are dead in that second study. 25%!!! Unbelievable ruling. Chilling. Wrong.

  3. MELISA EVA VALUE INVESTMENT Greetings to you from Melisa Eva Value Investment. We offer Business and Personal loans, it is quick and easy and hence can be availed without any hassle. We do not ask for any collateral or guarantors while approving these loans and hence these loans require minimum documentation. We offer great and competitive interest rates of 2% which do not weigh you down too much. These loans have a comfortable pay-back period. Apply today by contacting us on E-mail: melisaeva9@gmail.com WE DO NOT ASK FOR AN UPFRONT FEE. BEWARE OF SCAMMERS AND ONLINE FRAUD.

  4. Mr. Levin says that the BMV engaged in misconduct--that the BMV (or, rather, someone in the BMV) knew Indiana motorists were being overcharged fees but did nothing to correct the situation. Such misconduct, whether engaged in by one individual or by a group, is called theft (defined as knowingly or intentionally exerting unauthorized control over the property of another person with the intent to deprive the other person of the property's value or use). Theft is a crime in Indiana (as it still is in most of the civilized world). One wonders, then, why there have been no criminal prosecutions of BMV officials for this theft? Government misconduct doesn't occur in a vacuum. An individual who works for or oversees a government agency is responsible for the misconduct. In this instance, somebody (or somebodies) with the BMV, at some time, knew Indiana motorists were being overcharged. What's more, this person (or these people), even after having the error of their ways pointed out to them, did nothing to fix the problem. Instead, the overcharges continued. Thus, the taxpayers of Indiana are also on the hook for the millions of dollars in attorneys fees (for both sides; the BMV didn't see fit to avail itself of the services of a lawyer employed by the state government) that had to be spent in order to finally convince the BMV that stealing money from Indiana motorists was a bad thing. Given that the BMV official(s) responsible for this crime continued their misconduct, covered it up, and never did anything until the agency reached an agreeable settlement, it seems the statute of limitations for prosecuting these folks has not yet run. I hope our Attorney General is paying attention to this fiasco and is seriously considering prosecution. Indiana, the state that works . . . for thieves.

  5. I'm glad that attorney Carl Hayes, who represented the BMV in this case, is able to say that his client "is pleased to have resolved the issue". Everyone makes mistakes, even bureaucratic behemoths like Indiana's BMV. So to some extent we need to be forgiving of such mistakes. But when those mistakes are going to cost Indiana taxpayers millions of dollars to rectify (because neither plaintiff's counsel nor Mr. Hayes gave freely of their services, and the BMV, being a state-funded agency, relies on taxpayer dollars to pay these attorneys their fees), the agency doesn't have a right to feel "pleased to have resolved the issue". One is left wondering why the BMV feels so pleased with this resolution? The magnitude of the agency's overcharges might suggest to some that, perhaps, these errors were more than mere oversight. Could this be why the agency is so "pleased" with this resolution? Will Indiana motorists ever be assured that the culture of incompetence (if not worse) that the BMV seems to have fostered is no longer the status quo? Or will even more "overcharges" and lawsuits result? It's fairly obvious who is really "pleased to have resolved the issue", and it's not Indiana's taxpayers who are on the hook for the legal fees generated in these cases.

ADVERTISEMENT