ILNews

Hammerle on ... 'American Hustle' leads favorites for 2014 Oscars

Robert Hammerle
February 12, 2014
Keywords
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

bob hammerle movie reviewsThe Oscars take place March 2, so it’s time to humiliate myself and make predictions. Then again, what would cause you to place your money on the opinion of a criminal defense lawyer for God’s sake? My idol has always been Atticus Finch, and didn’t his innocent client get convicted in “To Kill a Mockingbird?”

BEST PICTURE – “American Hustle”

Simply stated, director David O. Russell had the rug pulled out from underneath him last year when his brilliant “Silver Linings Playbook” was ignored, and I can’t see them doing that to him two years in a row. Yes, “12 Years a Slave,” “Dallas Buyers Club” and “Gravity” are equally deserving, and no one would applaud more enthusiastically if “Nebraska” or “Philomena” won. Yet my instincts tell me that it has to go to Russell’s film.

BEST ACTOR – Chiwetel Ejiofor

This comes down to Matthew McConaughey’s performance in “Dallas Buyers Club” and Ejiofor in “12 Years a Slave.” His gigantic performance should always remind you of what slavery was really like despite the loveable Mammy in “Gone with the Wind” (1939). The British-born son of Nigerian parents deserves this, and what a fine moment it would be.

BEST ACTRESS – Cate Blanchett

Though Ms. Blanchett’s character in “Blue Jasmine” was nearly as unlikeable as Leonardo DiCaprio’s loathsome character in “The Wolf of Wall Street, she made you reach the point where you almost cared for her, and I’ve got to think she will grab the prize. But don’t count out Amy Adams, who is lurking in the shadows with “American Hustle.”

BEST SUPPORTING ACTOR - Jared Leto

This prize belongs to Leto. His only real competition is Barkhad Abdi, the beleaguered pirate in “Captain Phillips.” However, I think Leto’s portrayal of a dying transvestite in “Dallas Buyers Club” wins hands down.

BEST SUPPORTING ACTRESS – June Squibb

This award comes down to either Lupita Nyong’o for her heartbreaking performance in “12 Years a Slave” or Squibb as Bruce Dern’s ornery 84-year-old wife with an attitude in “Nebraska.” I really wish it could be a tie, but give it to Squibb.

BEST DIRECTOR – David O. Russell

Here’s to you, Russell. Again, you can’t leave him standing at the door for two spectacular works two years in a row.

ANIMATED FEATURE – “Frozen”

This one was as easy to pick as Leto for Best Supporting Actor.

FILM EDITING – “American Hustle”

I really don’t have the expertise to make a meaningful selection in this category, but history has tended to show that the Best Picture winner also wins the Oscar for film editing.

CINEMATOGRAPHY – “Gravity”

There is only one winner in this category, and it begins several awards for this spectacularly visual film.

DOCUMENTARY FEATURE – “20 Feet from Stardom”

A great story about backup singers told with provocative thoughts from Bruce Springsteen, David Bowie and others. The backup singers in this sterling film deserve to be seen at the front of the stage. (Please ignore the sad fact that I haven’t seen the other nominees!)

COSTUME DESIGN – “American Hustle”

Our boys looked good in this film, but no one will ever forget the gowns worn by Amy Adams and Jennifer Lawrence.

MAKEUP AND HAIRSTYLING – “Dallas Buyers Club”

Did you see the makeup and hairstyling done to Leto in his captivating performance? I did, and I would guess that even some of those adamant in their opposition to same-sex marriage secretly found him attractive.

VISUAL EFFECTS – “Gravity”

This is really a contest between “Gravity” and “The Hobbit: Deosolation of Smaug.” While it wouldn’t disappoint me at all to see “The Hobbit” win, the stunning visual effects in “Gravity” dealt with a reflection of reality, not fantasy. Alfonso Cuaron’s group deserves this Oscar.

ORIGINAL SCORE – “Gravity”

Whether it out-muscles “American Hustle” for the Best Picture Oscar, it has to be the favorite to take home the prize in this category.

ORIGINAL SONG – “Let It Go” from “Frozen”

This also should be a no-brainer.

PRODUCTION DESIGN – “Gravity”

The strength of this film is found in its visuals, and that has to begin with this category.

SOUND EDITING and SOUND MIXING – “The Hobbit: Desolation of Smaug”

Given the legitimate appeal of “Gravity,” I’m clearly going out on a limb here. However, I remember that director Peter Jackson’s team won in these two categories when they remade “King Kong” (2005). Let history repeat itself.

ORIGINAL SCREENPLAY – “Her”

Though I still believe that its mistreatment of women made it a mistake to nominate “Her” for best picture, it clearly stands out in this category. Spike Jonze has written a unique script. Though Bob Nelson is right there with the incredibly engaging “Nebraska,” I think Jonze’s creative ingenuity carries the day despite its weaknesses.

ADAPTED SCREENPLAY – “12 Years a Slave”

The emotional effect and historical significance of “12 Years a Slave” can’t possibly be ignored.

ANIMATED SHORT FILM – “Get a Horse!”

Though the films in this category won’t reach Indianapolis until after my deadline, I’m going out on a limb and picking Disney’s very funny tale about Mickey and Minnie Mouse as they battle Pegleg Pete. If you’ve seen “Frozen,” you’ve already seen this inspired animated film as a lead-in.

LIVE ACTION SHORT FILM - Not here by deadline.

DOCUMENTARY SHORT SUBJECT - Not here at all!

FOREIGN LANGUAGE FILM - ?

While Indianapolis has once again all but ignored foreign films, my biggest disappointment is that neither “Instructions Not Included” from Mexico and “Wajda” from Saudi Arabia are nominees. Maybe their homelands failed to submit them as potential nominations, but they remain extraordinary films that all of you should see. As noted in my earlier reviews, “Instructions Not Included” was the highest grossing Mexican film in the history of this country, and “Wajda” was the first film to be directed by a female Saudi director.

Regardless of who wins in this Oscar race, please remember to see “The Way, Way Back” and “Short Term 12.” To the extent that it matters, they remain two of my favorite films of 2013.•

__________

Robert Hammerle
practices criminal law in Indianapolis. When he is not in the courtroom or working diligently in his Pennsylvania Street office, Bob can likely be found at one of his favorite movie theaters watching and preparing to review the latest films. To read more of his reviews, visit www.bigmouthbobs.com. The opinions expressed are those of the author.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Indiana State Bar Association

Indianapolis Bar Association

Evansville Bar Association

Allen County Bar Association

Indiana Lawyer on Facebook

facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. So that none are misinformed by my posting wihtout a non de plume here, please allow me to state that I am NOT an Indiana licensed attorney, although I am an Indiana resident approved to practice law and represent clients in Indiana's fed court of Nth Dist and before the 7th circuit. I remain licensed in KS, since 1996, no discipline. This must be clarified since the IN court records will reveal that I did sit for and pass the Indiana bar last February. Yet be not confused by the fact that I was so allowed to be tested .... I am not, to be clear in the service of my duty to be absolutely candid about this, I AM NOT a member of the Indiana bar, and might never be so licensed given my unrepented from errors of thought documented in this opinion, at fn2, which likely supports Mr Smith's initial post in this thread: http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-7th-circuit/1592921.html

  2. When I served the State of Kansas as Deputy AG over Consumer Protection & Antitrust for four years, supervising 20 special agents and assistant attorneys general (back before the IBLE denied me the right to practice law in Indiana for not having the right stuff and pretty much crushed my legal career) we had a saying around the office: Resist the lure of the ring!!! It was a take off on Tolkiem, the idea that absolute power (I signed investigative subpoenas as a judge would in many other contexts, no need to show probable cause)could corrupt absolutely. We feared that we would overreach constitutional limits if not reminded, over and over, to be mindful to not do so. Our approach in so challenging one another was Madisonian, as the following quotes from the Father of our Constitution reveal: The essence of Government is power; and power, lodged as it must be in human hands, will ever be liable to abuse. We are right to take alarm at the first experiment upon our liberties. I believe there are more instances of the abridgement of freedom of the people by gradual and silent encroachments by those in power than by violent and sudden usurpations. Liberty may be endangered by the abuse of liberty, but also by the abuse of power. All men having power ought to be mistrusted. -- James Madison, Federalist Papers and other sources: http://www.constitution.org/jm/jm_quotes.htm RESIST THE LURE OF THE RING ALL YE WITH POLITICAL OR JUDICIAL POWER!

  3. My dear Mr Smith, I respect your opinions and much enjoy your posts here. We do differ on our view of the benefits and viability of the American Experiment in Ordered Liberty. While I do agree that it could be better, and that your points in criticism are well taken, Utopia does indeed mean nowhere. I think Madison, Jefferson, Adams and company got it about as good as it gets in a fallen post-Enlightenment social order. That said, a constitution only protects the citizens if it is followed. We currently have a bevy of public officials and judicial agents who believe that their subjectivism, their personal ideology, their elitist fears and concerns and cause celebs trump the constitutions of our forefathers. This is most troubling. More to follow in the next post on that subject.

  4. Yep I am not Bryan Brown. Bryan you appear to be a bigger believer in the Constitution than I am. Were I still a big believer then I might be using my real name like you. Personally, I am no longer a fan of secularism. I favor the confessional state. In religious mattes, it seems to me that social diversity is chaos and conflict, while uniformity is order and peace.... secularism has been imposed by America on other nations now by force and that has not exactly worked out very well.... I think the American historical experiment with disestablishmentarianism is withering on the vine before our eyes..... Since I do not know if that is OK for an officially licensed lawyer to say, I keep the nom de plume.

  5. I am compelled to announce that I am not posting under any Smith monikers here. That said, the post below does have a certain ring to it that sounds familiar to me: http://www.catholicnewworld.com/cnwonline/2014/0907/cardinal.aspx

ADVERTISEMENT