ILNews

Hammerle on ... 'The Hunger Games: Catching Fire','Dallas Buyers Club'

Robert Hammerle
December 4, 2013
Keywords
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

bob hammerle movie reviews“The Hunger Games: Catching Fire”

“The Hunger Games: Catching Fire” combines the adventure, power and allure of such classics as “Avatar” (2009), “The Lord of the Rings” trilogy and the unforgettable “Harry Potter” films. However, there is one significant difference, as the central star of this superior film is not a hero, but a heroine, something not missed by young women of this country.

As the unforgettable Katniss Everdeen, Jennifer Lawrence dances in the same cinematic galaxy as Judy Garland in “The Wizard of Oz” and Vivian Leigh in “Gone with the Wind,” both released in 1939. Trying to save her country and family, she repeatedly risks her own life while dancing on the edge of destruction.

Not to be overlooked is the simple fact that she is also wrestling with her own personal life. Emotionally drawn to two endearing young men, played by Liam Hemsworth and Josh Hutcherson, she may be the first young actress in a great film to repeatedly kiss two men.

hammerleIn summary, “The Hunger Games: Catching Fire” picks up following the triumph of Katniss and Hutcherson’s Peeta Mellark in the original film. Becoming the symbol of a growing public dislike of the central government, Katniss is involuntarily sucked back into another fight for her life.

Donald Sutherland is again magnificent as the malevolent President Snow, a man now dedicated to seeing that Katniss dies. The film is further helped by the appearance of the great Philip Seymour Hoffman as the president’s right hand man, a guy who you sense from the beginning has questionable loyalties.

Despite the film’s multiple tragedies – you see protesters whipped at the stake and killed – several brilliant performances inject enjoyment and humor into this adventure from the very beginning. Woody Harrelson is perfect as Haymitch Abernathy, Katniss’ adviser, a guy who will drink anything just to keep his edge.

Stanley Tucci again appears as Caesar Flickerman, the patron saint of all game show hosts. He is a man with a great ponytail and a record number of gleaming white teeth.

Elizabeth Banks, playing the ostentatiously dressed Effie Trinket, is again Katniss’ guide, and she begins to show a bit of sympathy for the beleaguered young girl. And good grief, take a look at her eyelashes and clothes, as costume designer Trish Summerville is surely destined for Oscar recognition.

Finally, don’t overlook the performance of Jena Malone as Johanna, a Hunger Games contestant who teams up with Katniss and Peeta. She is both daring and attractive, and she has a sarcastic edge that makes her memorable.

Unlike the “Twilight” movies, there is nothing cheap or artificial about “The Hunger Games: Catching Fire.” A government is suppressing its people while trying to divert their attention with young people fighting to the death. A growing number of participants aren’t buying it for a second, and it is clear that a civil war is brewing.

There are two more films to be released in this saga so Katniss’ battle with President Snow continues. My money is on Jennifer Lawrence. Enjoy the ride!

“Dallas Buyers Club”

“Dallas Buyers Club” is the type of movie that all loyal cinema fans cherish. It stomps on your heart while simultaneously soothing your soul. Much like “12 Years a Slave,” it recreates a staggering moment in our country’s history that brings shame on our national heritage.

hammerleMatthew McConaughey continues his resurrection, here playing Ron Woodroof, a Texan living in 1985 who rides bulls in the rodeo when not working as an electrician. Skinny as a rail, he cares about little else other than gambling, whisky, cocaine and having sex with strippers whenever they are available.

In failing health, he ends up in a hospital and is stunned to learn that he has HIV. A morbid heterosexual who hates gays, he retreats into the dark corners of his pedestrian life. Think of him as related to the present mayor of Toronto or the prior mayor of San Diego.

Facing a medical projection that gives him 30 days to live, the film erupts beyond description from captivating performances by Jared Leto and Griffin Dunne. Leto is devastatingly compelling playing Rayon, an AIDS-stricken transsexual that Woodroof meets in the hospital. Initially repulsed by Rayon, they become unexpected business partners after Woodroof flees to Mexico for drugs that are unavailable in the States.

Leto’s performance is magnificent on multiple levels. He is as attractive as he is vibrant, and you never can take your eyes off of him while he travels his painfully slow road to the great beyond.

As for Dunne, he plays Dr. Vass, an unlicensed American physician who has retreated to Mexico. He takes Woodroof under his wing, providing him with non-FDA approved medication to take back to the States. Dunne is charming at every turn.

The film then centers around Woodroof and Rayon forming a company known as the Dallas Buyers Club. While they are not selling illegal drugs, they allow AIDS patients to join on a monthly basis so that needed medications can be provided. Everyone is smiling but the United States government and America’s pharmaceutical industry.

The performance by Jennifer Garner should also be noted, here playing Dr. Eve Saks, one of Woodroof’s original treating physicians. She becomes the centerpiece of the AIDS treatment controversy experienced by all physicians in our country at the time. She and her colleagues had to choose between the accepted treatment with a drug known as AZT or tolerate clubs like Woodroof’s that won’t wait for the FDA to get off its reluctant butt. Simply stated, AIDS patients were left to sink or swim under a national policy dictated by the political influence of drug manufactures.

This is a film that will force you to remember how horrified the country became when Rock Hudson died of AIDS. Citizens had to ask a difficult question, namely “If Rock was gay, then who else is?”

When you see the moment Woodroof hugs Rayon publicly simply to provide him with a bit of dignity, you know the answer to that question remains “Who cares?”•

__________

Robert Hammerle practices criminal law in Indianapolis. When he is not in the courtroom or working diligently in his Pennsylvania Street office, Bob can likely be found at one of his favorite movie theaters watching and preparing to review the latest films. To read more of his reviews, visit www.bigmouthbobs.com. The opinions expressed are those of the author.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. I have been on this program while on parole from 2011-2013. No person should be forced mentally to share private details of their personal life with total strangers. Also giving permission for a mental therapist to report to your parole agent that your not participating in group therapy because you don't have the financial mean to be in the group therapy. I was personally singled out and sent back three times for not having money and also sent back within the six month when you aren't to be sent according to state law. I will work to het this INSOMM's removed from this state. I also had twelve or thirteen parole agents with a fifteen month period. Thanks for your time.

  2. Our nation produces very few jurists of the caliber of Justice DOUGLAS and his peers these days. Here is that great civil libertarian, who recognized government as both a blessing and, when corrupted by ideological interests, a curse: "Once the investigator has only the conscience of government as a guide, the conscience can become ‘ravenous,’ as Cromwell, bent on destroying Thomas More, said in Bolt, A Man For All Seasons (1960), p. 120. The First Amendment mirrors many episodes where men, harried and harassed by government, sought refuge in their conscience, as these lines of Thomas More show: ‘MORE: And when we stand before God, and you are sent to Paradise for doing according to your conscience, *575 and I am damned for not doing according to mine, will you come with me, for fellowship? ‘CRANMER: So those of us whose names are there are damned, Sir Thomas? ‘MORE: I don't know, Your Grace. I have no window to look into another man's conscience. I condemn no one. ‘CRANMER: Then the matter is capable of question? ‘MORE: Certainly. ‘CRANMER: But that you owe obedience to your King is not capable of question. So weigh a doubt against a certainty—and sign. ‘MORE: Some men think the Earth is round, others think it flat; it is a matter capable of question. But if it is flat, will the King's command make it round? And if it is round, will the King's command flatten it? No, I will not sign.’ Id., pp. 132—133. DOUGLAS THEN WROTE: Where government is the Big Brother,11 privacy gives way to surveillance. **909 But our commitment is otherwise. *576 By the First Amendment we have staked our security on freedom to promote a multiplicity of ideas, to associate at will with kindred spirits, and to defy governmental intrusion into these precincts" Gibson v. Florida Legislative Investigation Comm., 372 U.S. 539, 574-76, 83 S. Ct. 889, 908-09, 9 L. Ed. 2d 929 (1963) Mr. Justice DOUGLAS, concurring. I write: Happy Memorial Day to all -- God please bless our fallen who lived and died to preserve constitutional governance in our wonderful series of Republics. And God open the eyes of those government officials who denounce the constitutions of these Republics by arbitrary actions arising out capricious motives.

  3. From back in the day before secularism got a stranglehold on Hoosier jurists comes this great excerpt via Indiana federal court judge Allan Sharp, dedicated to those many Indiana government attorneys (with whom I have dealt) who count the law as a mere tool, an optional tool that is not to be used when political correctness compels a more acceptable result than merely following the path that the law directs: ALLEN SHARP, District Judge. I. In a scene following a visit by Henry VIII to the home of Sir Thomas More, playwriter Robert Bolt puts the following words into the mouths of his characters: Margaret: Father, that man's bad. MORE: There is no law against that. ROPER: There is! God's law! MORE: Then God can arrest him. ROPER: Sophistication upon sophistication! MORE: No, sheer simplicity. The law, Roper, the law. I know what's legal not what's right. And I'll stick to what's legal. ROPER: Then you set man's law above God's! MORE: No, far below; but let me draw your attention to a fact I'm not God. The currents and eddies of right and wrong, which you find such plain sailing, I can't navigate. I'm no voyager. But in the thickets of law, oh, there I'm a forester. I doubt if there's a man alive who could follow me there, thank God... ALICE: (Exasperated, pointing after Rich) While you talk, he's gone! MORE: And go he should, if he was the Devil himself, until he broke the law! ROPER: So now you'd give the Devil benefit of law! MORE: Yes. What would you do? Cut a great road through the law to get after the Devil? ROPER: I'd cut down every law in England to do that! MORE: (Roused and excited) Oh? (Advances on Roper) And when the last law was down, and the Devil turned round on you where would you hide, Roper, the laws being flat? (He leaves *1257 him) This country's planted thick with laws from coast to coast man's laws, not God's and if you cut them down and you're just the man to do it d'you really think you would stand upright in the winds that would blow then? (Quietly) Yes, I'd give the Devil benefit of law, for my own safety's sake. ROPER: I have long suspected this; this is the golden calf; the law's your god. MORE: (Wearily) Oh, Roper, you're a fool, God's my god... (Rather bitterly) But I find him rather too (Very bitterly) subtle... I don't know where he is nor what he wants. ROPER: My God wants service, to the end and unremitting; nothing else! MORE: (Dryly) Are you sure that's God! He sounds like Moloch. But indeed it may be God And whoever hunts for me, Roper, God or Devil, will find me hiding in the thickets of the law! And I'll hide my daughter with me! Not hoist her up the mainmast of your seagoing principles! They put about too nimbly! (Exit More. They all look after him). Pgs. 65-67, A MAN FOR ALL SEASONS A Play in Two Acts, Robert Bolt, Random House, New York, 1960. Linley E. Pearson, Atty. Gen. of Indiana, Indianapolis, for defendants. Childs v. Duckworth, 509 F. Supp. 1254, 1256 (N.D. Ind. 1981) aff'd, 705 F.2d 915 (7th Cir. 1983)

  4. "Meanwhile small- and mid-size firms are getting squeezed and likely will not survive unless they become a boutique firm." I've been a business attorney in small, and now mid-size firm for over 30 years, and for over 30 years legal consultants have been preaching this exact same mantra of impending doom for small and mid-sized firms -- verbatim. This claim apparently helps them gin up merger opportunities from smaller firms who become convinced that they need to become larger overnight. The claim that large corporations are interested in cost-saving and efficiency has likewise been preached for decades, and is likewise bunk. If large corporations had any real interest in saving money they wouldn't use large law firms whose rates are substantially higher than those of high-quality mid-sized firms.

  5. The family is the foundation of all human government. That is the Grand Design. Modern governments throw off this Design and make bureaucratic war against the family, as does Hollywood and cultural elitists such as third wave feminists. Since WWII we have been on a ship of fools that way, with both the elite and government and their social engineering hacks relentlessly attacking the very foundation of social order. And their success? See it in the streets of Fergusson, on the food stamp doles (mostly broken families)and in the above article. Reject the Grand Design for true social function, enter the Glorious State to manage social dysfunction. Our Brave New World will be a prison camp, and we will welcome it as the only way to manage given the anarchy without it.

ADVERTISEMENT