ILNews

Hebenstreit: Another Reason to be Proud of Indy

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

IBA-hebenstreit“It’s a new track record!” I can still hear that deep, deliberate, and excited voice of the late Tom Carnegie over the loudspeaker at the Speedway. We all instantly knew that familiar and iconic voice announcing the new speed record of the likes of Mears, Andretti, Luyendyk, or Fittipaldi as they flew around that two and one half mile oval. It was even more recognizable than the voice of Jim Nabors singing “Back Home Again in Indiana.”

My love of the Indy 500 began in high school when I sold programs at the Speedway. My Dad would get up about 3 a.m. to drive me all the way across town so I could be there on time to sell the $2 programs. In addition to the economic incentive, the draw for me was that we all had total access to the Motor Speedway and could stay and watch the racing. Over the years, I discovered most of the nooks and crannies of the world’s greatest race course. In the intervening forty plus years, I have only missed the Greatest Spectacle in Racing a handful of times. It has become a tradition.

In Indy, we are quite fortunate to have such a magnificent facility as the Indianapolis Motor Speedway. It is hard to believe that such a huge venue is only about 5 miles from the heart of downtown. This year the Speedway is celebrating the Centennial of the Indy 500. As with most other sports, the motorsports industry has grown and changed considerably. Racing used to be a barn storming event loosely held on weekend afternoons. Watching AJ Foyt over the years, I wondered if the day would come that he would not be able to squeeze into the cockpit. Now the drivers are as physically fit as Olympic athletes. Just as the technical engineering and physicality of the drivers have changed, so have the business and legal aspects of the growing sport.

In mid April, the IndyBar is co-hosting a great racing event. TRAC, the acronym of The Racing Attorney Conference, will take place at the Conrad Hotel on April 13 and 14th. IndyBar member, Wes Zirkle serves as Executive Vice President and General Counsel of Just Marketing International. If you read the IBJ, you surely have seen many articles about Just Marketing due to its high profile work in sports marketing and particularly in the motorsports industry. Several years ago, Wes was in Toronto at a conference for the Sports Lawyers Association. Over the years, Wes had become friends with many sports lawyers across the country including Brooke Beyer, Jr., the Assistant General Counsel of NASCAR located in Charlotte, North Carolina, and Stoke Caldwell, Jr,. a Charlotte motorsports attorney. During that conference, these three decided that most sports conferences did not sufficiently address motorsports. They decided to host a dedicated motorsports law conference and attract the biggest names in the motorsports world. They then recruited William Bray from Charlotte and Mark Richards from Indianapolis to join them. TRAC was born.

The group decided that the venue would alternate on a yearly basis between Charlotte and Indianapolis. The first conference was held at the Charlotte Motor Speedway while, coincidentally, the roar of engines often overtook the speakers as testing was simultaneously occurring. The following year the event was held in the press room of the Indianapolis Motor Speedway, impressing many of the out-of-state attendees who had never been to our iconic speedway. Indianapolis is fortunate to host the conference again this year but the size of the crowd as well as the acoustics and room configuration made the Conrad a better location for the event.

In addition to being a very effective networking opportunity for the leaders of the sports and motorsports world, the conference features first class educational CLE presentations. The topics covered are fascinating and wide ranging. They include preparing your driver for opportunities outside the race car, dealing with state and local governments, obtaining injunctive relief in motorsports transactions, as well as new aspects of sports licensing and sponsorship. The presenters are a “who’s who” of the most noted and respected leaders in the sports racing industry from all over the country They are attorneys, corporate sponsors, team representatives as well as leaders of the various racing organizing bodies such as IndyCar and NASCAR. Attendees range from corporate leaders and attorneys to “mom and pop” dirt track racers who want to be better informed.

TRAC is co-presented by the IndyBar and the North Carolina Bar Association. Although Indy and Charlotte compete for some of the same clients and sponsors, the group has worked very well together to raise the level of awareness and information about Motorsports Law and the industry as well. If registration continues to go as well as expected, this year, the conference will set “a new track record.”•

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Just an aside, but regardless of the outcome, I 'm proud of Judge William Hughes. He was the original magistrate on the Home place issue. He ruled for Home Place, and was primaried by Brainard for it. Their tool Poindexter failed to unseat Hughes, who won support for his honesty and courage throughout the county, and he was reelected Judge of Hamilton County's Superior Court. You can still stand for something and survive. Thanks, Judge Hughes!

  2. CCHP's real accomplishment is the 2015 law signed by Gov Pence that basically outlaws any annexation that is forced where a 65% majority of landowners in the affected area disagree. Regardless of whether HP wins or loses, the citizens of Indiana will not have another fiasco like this. The law Gov Pence signed is a direct result of this malgovernance.

  3. I gave tempparry guardship to a friend of my granddaughter in 2012. I went to prison. I had custody. My daughter went to prison to. We are out. My daughter gave me custody but can get her back. She was not order to give me custody . but now we want granddaughter back from friend. She's 14 now. What rights do we have

  4. This sure is not what most who value good governance consider the Rule of Law to entail: "In a letter dated March 2, which Brizzi forwarded to IBJ, the commission dismissed the grievance “on grounds that there is not reasonable cause to believe that you are guilty of misconduct.”" Yet two month later reasonable cause does exist? (Or is the commission forging ahead, the need for reasonable belief be damned? -- A seeming violation of the Rules of Profession Ethics on the part of the commission) Could the rule of law theory cause one to believe that an explanation is in order? Could it be that Hoosier attorneys live under Imperial Law (which is also a t-word that rhymes with infamy) in which the Platonic guardians can do no wrong and never owe the plebeian class any explanation for their powerful actions. (Might makes it right?) Could this be a case of politics directing the commission, as celebrated IU Mauer Professor (the late) Patrick Baude warned was happening 20 years ago in his controversial (whisteblowing) ethics lecture on a quite similar topic: http://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1498&context=ilj

  5. I have a case presently pending cert review before the SCOTUS that reveals just how Indiana regulates the bar. I have been denied licensure for life for holding the wrong views and questioning the grand inquisitors as to their duties as to state and federal constitutional due process. True story: https://www.scribd.com/doc/299040839/2016Petitionforcert-to-SCOTUS Shorter, Amici brief serving to frame issue as misuse of govt licensure: https://www.scribd.com/doc/312841269/Thomas-More-Society-Amicus-Brown-v-Ind-Bd-of-Law-Examiners

ADVERTISEMENT