From what started as a 30-member group in 1878 to what is now a growing association
with nearly 5,000 members, the IBA has come a long way since well before we became members. With the original intention of
providing a law library and a central gathering place for the local legal community, the Bar has grown into an association
involved in everything from legal education, local legislation, judicial excellence, pro bono service, and so much more. Despite
enormous growth and change, the Bar’s core has remained the same: service to its members and the community, and the
unfaltering excellence of those that we are lucky to call our fellow lawyers and judges.
Through the years, the IBA has seen members move on, move up, and move out. We have said hello to new faces and good bye
to dear friends. Like the change in the seasons, our most senior lawyers have moved over to make way for young attorneys fresh
out of school. Our members have become as diverse in person as in practice, and we have room for more. Still, as we prepare
today for the future for our association and profession, we nevertheless love to hear the stories of “back in the day”,
when the courtroom community was small, laughter had a part in our daily practice, and a handshake sealed the deal over lunch.
Do you know the history of our Bar or those members that have preceded you? Did you know that the Indiana Historical Society
maintains the IBA records from 1878 to 1987, consisting of 4.25 linear feet of Bar history? (I am not sure if that includes
the four manuscript boxes and the one oversized folder in addition to the 29 bound volumes.) There is an impressive box and
folder inventory that includes everything from meetings of minutes to the guest book for the Centennial Celebration held on
November 30, 1978. If you are interested in something a little more recent, however, chances are that you’ll look for
it on the web. Sadly enough, you’ll not find a lot. The IBA and its members have long been good at making history, and
not as good at preserving it.
Google Indianapolis judges and you might find Judge’s Barbeque in Indianapolis. Search for detailed information on
many of our local judges and you are likely to come up with similar scant results. The Bar has a goal of creating a comprehensive
history of our lawyer leaders and many recorded conversations from past legal icons exist today as a result. The intention
is to make our history available in a user-friendly format that is accessible when you want it and how you want it. That project
will continue on.
In the meantime, however, as the investiture ceremonies of two new federal court judges approaches, we thought it a fitting
time to start honoring members’ achievements with a lasting gift. As a result, the IBA has commissioned the creation
of biographies befitting of the honor and perfect for web placement. In the near future, we will be unveiling the biographies
of the Honorable Jane Magnus Stinson and the Honorable Tanya Walton Pratt, not just for our legal community, but the community
at large. With only one other female judge on the Southern District bench, the Women & the Law Division of the IBA has
agreed to sponsor the creation of a biography for the Honorable Sarah Evans Barker. Our excitement to release these biographies
is only matched by our determination to continue with this project, building a legal history one biography at a time and leaving
a lasting legacy available at the touch of your fingertips.
And so, you ask, Napoleon who? Not Napoleon Bonaparte or Napoleon Dynamite. Rather, the Napoleon to which the title refers
is Napoleon B. Taylor, a man famous in his own right. He was, in 1878, the first President of the Indianapolis Bar Association.•














I highly recommend Deanna and her team of professionals that serve the legal community. Great information and many thanks for sharing.
they are pushing these cases against lawyers too far. thought-crime.
vagueness cannot challenged, so let's write all laws vaguely and throw the constitution out the window.Even if the court is operating under a particular law, if they don't it they will change it to their liking. What a joke!!!
Two convictions becomes one conviction with exactly the same sentence, only it is not clear wheter or not that sentence will be 18 months, 120 months or 138 months. Actually if the guns were in a home, whether or not they were his, he is protected under the 2nd amendment. Jurors need to learn the law and the constitution before judging others. The cour5ts need to do this as well.
With all due respect, Rick, I think you probably would be making a mistake by going to law school. The job market for attorneys is so saturated, you may well find yourself unemployed and with a lot of debt. You mention law would be a good supplement to your skills. True. But employers unfortunately don't value that. You will find that a law degree may well pigeonhole you into an attorney slot and limit career options. If you have a good job now I would hold onto that. As an attorney, you may well end up making less with the aforementioned debt.