The Indiana Supreme Court has issued 14 orders amending various Indiana rules.
The orders are file stamped Sept. 21 and were posted Thursday. Many of the changes involve minor administrative updates,
although some amendments are more significant, including doubling the filing fee of relators when submitting an original action
application to the Supreme Court Administrator. It will now cost $250 to file.
Even though an amendment to Administrative Rule 3 changes the Indiana judicial districts from 14 to 26 for purposes of judicial
administration, the justices decided to leave the current structure of the Pro Bono Committees in Indiana at 14. The justices
want to give the Indiana Pro Bono Commission and district committees time to study the effect of the new 26 districts on their
operations and report on that to the court by Dec. 31, 2011. The 26 new judicial districts are effective Jan. 1, 2011.
Many of the orders were amended to include using the date a motion, judgment, or notice is noted in the Chronological Case
Summary as the trigger date for filing appeals or other motions.
The administrative rules have been amended to require all trial courts to use case numbers that include the year and month
in the second part of the case number. This is to make it easier to collect case filing statistics for periods of less than
one year. The amendment also asks trial courts with the ability to do so to extend the last part of the cause number to six
digits unless it requires reprogramming the court’s existing electronic case management system.
The Indiana court’s website has a complete list of the rules that were amended. All changes become effective Jan. 1, 2011.














With all due respect, Rick, I think you probably would be making a mistake by going to law school. The job market for attorneys is so saturated, you may well find yourself unemployed and with a lot of debt. You mention law would be a good supplement to your skills. True. But employers unfortunately don't value that. You will find that a law degree may well pigeonhole you into an attorney slot and limit career options. If you have a good job now I would hold onto that. As an attorney, you may well end up making less with the aforementioned debt.
Jack, I was only responding to bill's comment of tying everybody in government together. I agree with you though, it takes one bad apple to ruin the bunch.. As in any profession. What's truly unfair is when somebody violates someone's trust and takes complete advantage of someone
John’s comment is unfair. The majority of attorneys can be trusted. Unfortunately, all it takes is one greedy, unscrupulous, immoral attorney to jade the public.
In regards to bill's comment about trusting the cover meant. We can trust them about as much as we can trust attorneys'.
This is disturbing to learn...