As this year's legislative session winds down, several bills of interest to the legal community have made it through
both houses, but many remained stuck in conference committee Thursday.
Senate Bill 163, a child support bill with the controversial provision allowing for garnishment of back child support from
casino winnings, passed the full Senate 49-0 Thursday.
SB 394, an attorney general matters bill, has been signed by the president pro tempore. The bill authorizes the attorney
general to intervene in a declaratory judgment action alleging a statute or ordinance is unconstitutional, as well as allows
the AG to file an amicus brief without permission of the parties or court.
SB 36 also has been signed by the president pro tempore. The bill provides that magistrates who meet certain criteria may
be certified as special judges.
SB 140, dealing with adoption matters, passed out of conference committee and is now ready for enrollment.
House Bill 1154, allowing commissioners in Marion County to have the same powers and duties as magistrates, is ready for
enrollment. The bill passed the House unanimously Monday.
HB 1193 is also ready for enrollment, passing Monday by a vote of 91-1. The bill establishes a law enforcement, school policing,
and youth work group run by the Indiana Criminal Justice Institute. The work group will consist of 26 voting members, including
an attorney, law school professor, and judge. The group will submit annual reports with information on legislation and training
curricula for schools and law enforcement to various officials, including the governor and the Indiana Supreme Court chief
justice.
Several bills remained in conference committee at Indiana Lawyer deadline.
The Senate and the House released conference committee reports for SB 307 Thursday, removing provisions added by the House
concerning the establishment of a third Bartholomew Superior Court and a unified Clark Circuit Court. The Senate report passed
late Thursday afternoon.
SB 149, a Department of Child Services bill that has added language about out-of-state placements, remained in conference
committee Thursday. Also stalling in conference committees were SB 224, a bill that specifies how sex offenders can remove
their names from the registry if they qualify; SB 399 that deals with caps on fines for moving violations; HB 1271 on problem-solving
courts; and HB 1276, which was amended to add language requiring the Judicial Technology Automation Committee to report on
the number of divorce decrees entered in the state.
The General Assembly intended to wrap up the session before March 14, possibly concluding Thursday, but that was still up
in the air at IL deadline.














vagueness cannot challenged, so let's write all laws vaguely and throw the constitution out the window.Even if the court is operating under a particular law, if they don't it they will change it to their liking. What a joke!!!
Two convictions becomes one conviction with exactly the same sentence, only it is not clear wheter or not that sentence will be 18 months, 120 months or 138 months. Actually if the guns were in a home, whether or not they were his, he is protected under the 2nd amendment. Jurors need to learn the law and the constitution before judging others. The cour5ts need to do this as well.
With all due respect, Rick, I think you probably would be making a mistake by going to law school. The job market for attorneys is so saturated, you may well find yourself unemployed and with a lot of debt. You mention law would be a good supplement to your skills. True. But employers unfortunately don't value that. You will find that a law degree may well pigeonhole you into an attorney slot and limit career options. If you have a good job now I would hold onto that. As an attorney, you may well end up making less with the aforementioned debt.
Jack, I was only responding to bill's comment of tying everybody in government together. I agree with you though, it takes one bad apple to ruin the bunch.. As in any profession. What's truly unfair is when somebody violates someone's trust and takes complete advantage of someone
John’s comment is unfair. The majority of attorneys can be trusted. Unfortunately, all it takes is one greedy, unscrupulous, immoral attorney to jade the public.