ILNews

Huelat wants DTCI to address decline in experienced civil defenders statewide

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Indiana Lawyer Focus

Jerry Huelat brings more than 30 years of legal experience to the presidency of the Defense Trial Counsel of Indiana, the role he assumes in 2013. He hopes to broaden the organization’s membership and reinforce the importance of capable counsel statewide.

Read what Huelat had to say on that topic – as well as where to go for a good meal – in a recent Q&A with the Indiana Lawyer.

IL: Tell us about your plans as DTCI president in 2013.

JH: During the past 12 years, a large number of defense firms throughout the state have turned away from insurance defense litigation, because many insurance companies have gone “in-house” for a majority of suits filed. This has resulted in a significant decline in the number of defense firms north and south of Indianapolis. I am fearful that, if the insurance industry does not take steps to address this decline, it will have a difficult time finding competent and experienced defense lawyers outside of the Indianapolis area. My goal is to sit down with representatives of the industry to discuss this issue and offer solutions for this potential problem.

huelat-jerry-15col.jpg Jerry E. Huelat (IL Photo/ Perry Reichanadter)

Why do you encourage defense attorneys who aren’t DTCI members to join?

The DTCI’s membership is approximately 550 strong, and our members are involved in all aspects of defense litigation. The organization assists its members with expert witness research, and if a member would like to see a brief written on a particular subject, that material is promptly supplied. The substantive law sections include insurance coverage, health law litigation, products liability, worker’s compensation, employment law, construction law, defense trial tactics, business litigation and paralegals. In short, the organization provides virtually everything a civil defense lawyer could need.

How has being part of DTCI improved your skills in practice or in running your firm?

I have been on the board of directors of DTCI since 2001, and I have had the privilege of working with some of the finest lawyers in the state. Any time I have a question about a particular practice skill or issue concerning my law firm, all I have to do is ask members of the organization, and I generally receive an answer within a day or two.

You spent some time growing up in LaPorte County contemporaneously with a young John G. Roberts, who went on to become chief justice of the United States. You were a year apart and went to different schools, but do you remember ever crossing paths with him?

I attended high school in Crown Point, Ind., but my parents had a summer cottage in a small community southeast of LaPorte. I never met Judge Roberts until earlier this year when my daughter, Jaime M. Oss, and I were admitted before the United States Supreme Court. When Chief Justice Roberts heard that my daughter and I were from Michigan City, he came to the conference room where our group had assembled and asked how everything was going in the county. Despite the fact that I only spoke with Chief Justice Roberts for approximately five minutes, I came away with the impression that he was genuinely interested in the people of LaPorte County and had fond memories of his childhood here.

We’re going to ask you for some broad generalizations, realizing that our question may reflect some Hoosier-centric cultural assumptions on our part. Representing a statewide organization, have you sensed any differences between attorneys from “The Region” and those from, say, Indianapolis, Evansville, Bloomington, or elsewhere in Indiana? We set our clocks differently, but are there other differences, besides our various accents?

My general litigation practice has taken me to virtually every court in Northern Indiana. I have also had the privilege of handling cases in Fort Wayne, Lafayette, and about every county between here and Indianapolis, and I can tell you that there is very little difference between attorneys from one region to another. I should also add that I am always amazed at how bright and confident Indiana lawyers are. When lawyers from different states come into our courts, we generally do quite well, because our approach to litigation is reflective of our common sense attitude.

What are some of the things you most enjoy doing in your spare time that have nothing to do with the practice?

I play a lot of golf and run 30 to 40 miles a week.

Tell us about someone or something that inspired you to want to become an attorney.

Abraham Lincoln.

There’s a lot being said and written about the value of a law school education relative to a legal job market that seems to be contracting. What would be your advice for undergraduates who are considering a legal career but might be anxious about the prospects?

It is my view that the legal profession will always need excellent lawyers. My advice to any undergraduate considering a legal career is to pursue the career only if you are willing to work hard and you want to make a difference in the lives of the people you will represent.

dtci-fbox.gifWhat are some of the things DTCI does to mentor and encourage young lawyers?

DTCI puts on a rookie seminar for young lawyers, and members of the organization work very hard to promote the importance of experience. I can say without question that senior members of defense firms spend a great deal of time working with young lawyers to help each of them develop skills that will serve them in the future. I have seen hundreds of young lawyers from our organization grow and develop into skillful litigators, and that is due to the training and experience offered to them by the lawyers they work with.

What’s your favorite restaurant in Indiana?

This is easy, St. Elmo’s.

Back to Michigan City ... and we confess this is a bit off topic. Can you share any advice on how we might get comped at the Blue Chip Hotel and Casino? Is there a codeword or something?

No, other than signing up for its rewards card, but if you can provide that information to me, I would certainly appreciate it!

Let’s turn to civility. Do you believe attorneys generally are being more civil these days?

I do believe that attorneys are starting to realize the importance of civility both inside and outside the courtroom. Older, more experienced attorneys, as well as our courts, have played a prominent role in addressing this particular issue, but there is still work to be done.

Do you anticipate some continuation of the joint presentations on civility that began last year between DTCI and the Indiana Trial Lawyers Association?

Yes, and I am hopeful that the two organizations will schedule another program sometime next year.

You must choose: Chicago Bears or Indianapolis Colts?

I was born and raised on the south side of Chicago until I moved to Crown Point, Ind., when I was 12 years old. I love the Bears, but when the Colts are not playing the Bears, I cheer for the Colts, as well.•
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. I have been on this program while on parole from 2011-2013. No person should be forced mentally to share private details of their personal life with total strangers. Also giving permission for a mental therapist to report to your parole agent that your not participating in group therapy because you don't have the financial mean to be in the group therapy. I was personally singled out and sent back three times for not having money and also sent back within the six month when you aren't to be sent according to state law. I will work to het this INSOMM's removed from this state. I also had twelve or thirteen parole agents with a fifteen month period. Thanks for your time.

  2. Our nation produces very few jurists of the caliber of Justice DOUGLAS and his peers these days. Here is that great civil libertarian, who recognized government as both a blessing and, when corrupted by ideological interests, a curse: "Once the investigator has only the conscience of government as a guide, the conscience can become ‘ravenous,’ as Cromwell, bent on destroying Thomas More, said in Bolt, A Man For All Seasons (1960), p. 120. The First Amendment mirrors many episodes where men, harried and harassed by government, sought refuge in their conscience, as these lines of Thomas More show: ‘MORE: And when we stand before God, and you are sent to Paradise for doing according to your conscience, *575 and I am damned for not doing according to mine, will you come with me, for fellowship? ‘CRANMER: So those of us whose names are there are damned, Sir Thomas? ‘MORE: I don't know, Your Grace. I have no window to look into another man's conscience. I condemn no one. ‘CRANMER: Then the matter is capable of question? ‘MORE: Certainly. ‘CRANMER: But that you owe obedience to your King is not capable of question. So weigh a doubt against a certainty—and sign. ‘MORE: Some men think the Earth is round, others think it flat; it is a matter capable of question. But if it is flat, will the King's command make it round? And if it is round, will the King's command flatten it? No, I will not sign.’ Id., pp. 132—133. DOUGLAS THEN WROTE: Where government is the Big Brother,11 privacy gives way to surveillance. **909 But our commitment is otherwise. *576 By the First Amendment we have staked our security on freedom to promote a multiplicity of ideas, to associate at will with kindred spirits, and to defy governmental intrusion into these precincts" Gibson v. Florida Legislative Investigation Comm., 372 U.S. 539, 574-76, 83 S. Ct. 889, 908-09, 9 L. Ed. 2d 929 (1963) Mr. Justice DOUGLAS, concurring. I write: Happy Memorial Day to all -- God please bless our fallen who lived and died to preserve constitutional governance in our wonderful series of Republics. And God open the eyes of those government officials who denounce the constitutions of these Republics by arbitrary actions arising out capricious motives.

  3. From back in the day before secularism got a stranglehold on Hoosier jurists comes this great excerpt via Indiana federal court judge Allan Sharp, dedicated to those many Indiana government attorneys (with whom I have dealt) who count the law as a mere tool, an optional tool that is not to be used when political correctness compels a more acceptable result than merely following the path that the law directs: ALLEN SHARP, District Judge. I. In a scene following a visit by Henry VIII to the home of Sir Thomas More, playwriter Robert Bolt puts the following words into the mouths of his characters: Margaret: Father, that man's bad. MORE: There is no law against that. ROPER: There is! God's law! MORE: Then God can arrest him. ROPER: Sophistication upon sophistication! MORE: No, sheer simplicity. The law, Roper, the law. I know what's legal not what's right. And I'll stick to what's legal. ROPER: Then you set man's law above God's! MORE: No, far below; but let me draw your attention to a fact I'm not God. The currents and eddies of right and wrong, which you find such plain sailing, I can't navigate. I'm no voyager. But in the thickets of law, oh, there I'm a forester. I doubt if there's a man alive who could follow me there, thank God... ALICE: (Exasperated, pointing after Rich) While you talk, he's gone! MORE: And go he should, if he was the Devil himself, until he broke the law! ROPER: So now you'd give the Devil benefit of law! MORE: Yes. What would you do? Cut a great road through the law to get after the Devil? ROPER: I'd cut down every law in England to do that! MORE: (Roused and excited) Oh? (Advances on Roper) And when the last law was down, and the Devil turned round on you where would you hide, Roper, the laws being flat? (He leaves *1257 him) This country's planted thick with laws from coast to coast man's laws, not God's and if you cut them down and you're just the man to do it d'you really think you would stand upright in the winds that would blow then? (Quietly) Yes, I'd give the Devil benefit of law, for my own safety's sake. ROPER: I have long suspected this; this is the golden calf; the law's your god. MORE: (Wearily) Oh, Roper, you're a fool, God's my god... (Rather bitterly) But I find him rather too (Very bitterly) subtle... I don't know where he is nor what he wants. ROPER: My God wants service, to the end and unremitting; nothing else! MORE: (Dryly) Are you sure that's God! He sounds like Moloch. But indeed it may be God And whoever hunts for me, Roper, God or Devil, will find me hiding in the thickets of the law! And I'll hide my daughter with me! Not hoist her up the mainmast of your seagoing principles! They put about too nimbly! (Exit More. They all look after him). Pgs. 65-67, A MAN FOR ALL SEASONS A Play in Two Acts, Robert Bolt, Random House, New York, 1960. Linley E. Pearson, Atty. Gen. of Indiana, Indianapolis, for defendants. Childs v. Duckworth, 509 F. Supp. 1254, 1256 (N.D. Ind. 1981) aff'd, 705 F.2d 915 (7th Cir. 1983)

  4. "Meanwhile small- and mid-size firms are getting squeezed and likely will not survive unless they become a boutique firm." I've been a business attorney in small, and now mid-size firm for over 30 years, and for over 30 years legal consultants have been preaching this exact same mantra of impending doom for small and mid-sized firms -- verbatim. This claim apparently helps them gin up merger opportunities from smaller firms who become convinced that they need to become larger overnight. The claim that large corporations are interested in cost-saving and efficiency has likewise been preached for decades, and is likewise bunk. If large corporations had any real interest in saving money they wouldn't use large law firms whose rates are substantially higher than those of high-quality mid-sized firms.

  5. The family is the foundation of all human government. That is the Grand Design. Modern governments throw off this Design and make bureaucratic war against the family, as does Hollywood and cultural elitists such as third wave feminists. Since WWII we have been on a ship of fools that way, with both the elite and government and their social engineering hacks relentlessly attacking the very foundation of social order. And their success? See it in the streets of Fergusson, on the food stamp doles (mostly broken families)and in the above article. Reject the Grand Design for true social function, enter the Glorious State to manage social dysfunction. Our Brave New World will be a prison camp, and we will welcome it as the only way to manage given the anarchy without it.

ADVERTISEMENT