ILNews

IBA: Escape to Sedona this November with the IndyBar

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

iba-sedona-agendaStargazing, sunsets over the Red Rocks and…CLE? This unlikely combination makes for a can’t miss trip to this year’s IndyBar Destination CLE, to be held at the Enchantment Resort & Mii amo Spa in Sedona, Arizona November 15 to November 17.
 

sedona-15col.jpg

Kicking off with a welcome cocktail reception and dinner on Thursday, November 15, a stay in Red Rock Country will offer attendees mornings that feature CLE programs presented by top-notch Indy attorneys and judges, allowing the afternoons and evenings to be spent exploring what “Good Morning America” named one of the Top 10 most beautiful cities in the United States. Sedona boasts activities and destinations for nearly every interest, from arts and culture to history and archaeology.

Attendees will also have unique opportunity to experience the Sedona skies with JD and Karen Maddy, official astronomers for both the Arizona State Parks and the National Park Service, at a stargazing excursion on Friday evening. The Arizona high desert land is known for amazingly clear skies, making it the perfect location to view the nighttime sky without the interfering lights of nearby cities. These accomplished astronomers will personally guide participants through the cosmos with an array of scopes, refractors, astronomical binoculars and telescopes.

Chaired by Hon. Cale Bradford of the Indiana Court of Appeals, the Destination CLE committee is hard at work to ensure that the getaway features the perfect mix of education, socializing and opportunities to enjoy the picturesque surroundings of Sedona. Joining Judge Bradford on the committee are Hon. Robert R. Altice, Jr., Marion Superior Court; Hon. Hon Heather A. Welch, Marion Superior Court; Aaron Freeman, Voyles Zahn & Paul PA; Ellen Morrison Townsend, Hackman Hulett & Cracraft LLP; and Robert W. York, Robert W. York & Associates.

Don’t let this opportunity to enjoy a relaxing respite before the hustle and bustle of the holidays begins. The complete agenda, online registration and hotel booking information are available online at www.indybar.org.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Indiana State Bar Association

Indianapolis Bar Association

Evansville Bar Association

Allen County Bar Association

Indiana Lawyer on Facebook

facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. I need an experienced attorney to handle a breach of contract matter. Kindly respond for more details. Graham Young

  2. I thought the slurs were the least grave aspects of her misconduct, since they had nothing to do with her being on the bench. Why then do I suspect they were the focus? I find this a troubling trend. At least she was allowed to keep her law license.

  3. Section 6 of Article I of the Indiana Constitution is pretty clear and unequivocal: "Section 6. No money shall be drawn from the treasury for the benefit of any religious or theological institution."

  4. Video pen? Nice work, "JW"! Let this be a lesson and a caution to all disgruntled ex-spouses (or soon-to-be ex-spouses) . . . you may think that altercation is going to get you some satisfaction . . . it will not.

  5. First comment on this thread is a fitting final comment on this thread, as that the MCBA never answered Duncan's fine question, and now even Eric Holder agrees that the MCBA was in material error as to the facts: "I don't get it" from Duncan December 1, 2014 5:10 PM "The Grand Jury met for 25 days and heard 70 hours of testimony according to this article and they made a decision that no crime occurred. On what basis does the MCBA conclude that their decision was "unjust"? What special knowledge or evidence does the MCBA have that the Grand Jury hearing this matter was unaware of? The system that we as lawyers are sworn to uphold made a decision that there was insufficient proof that officer committed a crime. How can any of us say we know better what was right than the jury that actually heard all of the the evidence in this case."

ADVERTISEMENT