ILNews

IBA: Trimble to Lead Bar as President in 2015

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The Indianapolis Bar Association’s Nominating Committee has announced the selection of John C. Trimble of Lewis Wagner LLP as the 2015 President of the Indianapolis Bar Association. Currently an At Large Director on the board, Trimble will serve as the association’s First Vice President on the 2013 Board of Directors. Trimble was unopposed for the nomination.
 

trimble-john-mug.jpg Trimble

A partner at Lewis Wagner LLP, Trimble focuses his practice on catastrophic, complex and class-action litigation in state and federal court. He earned his B.A. from Hanover College and his J.D. from the Robert H. McKinney School of Law. Trimble, along with David K. Herzog of Faegre Baker Daniels, is a co-moderator for the Class X of the IndyBar’s Bar Leader Series.

James J. Bell of Bingham Greenebaum Doll was named to a two-year term as Secretary. In addition to previous service on several bar committees, Bell served on the Board of Directors as a Vice President in 2009 and 2010 and was the 2009 chair of the bar’s Criminal Justice Section.

Five At Large Directors were also selected. Chosen to serve through 2014 were Thomas A. Barnard, Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP; Master Commissioner Jason G. Reyome, Marion Superior Court; Aaron M. Freeman, Voyles Zahn & Paul PA; Andrew J. Mallon, Drewry Simmons Vornehm LLP; and Sean J. Fahey, Hall Render Killian Heath & Lyman PC.

As determined by previous nomination, the 2013 Board of Directors will be led by President Kerry Blomquist of the Indiana Coalition Against Domestic Violence. Jeff Abrams, Benesch Friedlander Coplan & Aronoff LLP, will be President Elect.

The 2012 Nominating Committee was chaired by the Hon. Jane Magnus-Stinson of the of United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana. Joining Judge Magnus-Stinson on the committee were Carl Butler, Frost Brown Todd LLC; Phil Isenbarger, Bingham Greenebaum Doll LLP; Martha S. Hollingsworth, retired; Hon. James S. Kirsch, Indiana Court of Appeals; Jennifer Lukemeyer, Voyles Zahn & Paul PA; and Sally Zweig, Katz & Korin PC.

The 2013 Board of Directors will be formally installed at the Indianapolis Bar Association and Foundation Installation Luncheon, to be held in early January 2013.•

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. The ADA acts as a tax upon all for the benefit of a few. And, most importantly, the many have no individual say in whether they pay the tax. Those with handicaps suffered in military service should get a pass, but those who are handicapped by accident or birth do NOT deserve that pass. The drivel about "equal access" is spurious because the handicapped HAVE equal access, they just can't effectively use it. That is their problem, not society's. The burden to remediate should be that of those who seek the benefit of some social, constructional, or dimensional change, NOT society generally. Everybody wants to socialize the costs and concentrate the benefits of government intrusion so that they benefit and largely avoid the costs. This simply maintains the constant push to the slop trough, and explains, in part, why the nation is 20 trillion dollars in the hole.

  2. Hey 2 psychs is never enough, since it is statistically unlikely that three will ever agree on anything! New study admits this pseudo science is about as scientifically valid as astrology ... done by via fortune cookie ....John Ioannidis, professor of health research and policy at Stanford University, said the study was impressive and that its results had been eagerly awaited by the scientific community. “Sadly, the picture it paints - a 64% failure rate even among papers published in the best journals in the field - is not very nice about the current status of psychological science in general, and for fields like social psychology it is just devastating,” he said. http://www.theguardian.com/science/2015/aug/27/study-delivers-bleak-verdict-on-validity-of-psychology-experiment-results

  3. Indianapolis Bar Association President John Trimble and I are on the same page, but it is a very large page with plenty of room for others to join us. As my final Res Gestae article will express in more detail in a few days, the Great Recession hastened a fundamental and permanent sea change for the global legal service profession. Every state bar is facing the same existential questions that thrust the medical profession into national healthcare reform debates. The bench, bar, and law schools must comprehensively reconsider how we define the practice of law and what it means to access justice. If the three principals of the legal service profession do not recast the vision of their roles and responsibilities soon, the marketplace will dictate those roles and responsibilities without regard for the public interests that the legal profession professes to serve.

  4. I have met some highly placed bureaucrats who vehemently disagree, Mr. Smith. This is not your father's time in America. Some ideas are just too politically incorrect too allow spoken, says those who watch over us for the good of their concept of order.

  5. Lets talk about this without forgetting that Lawyers, too, have FREEDOM OF SPEECH AND ASSOCIATION

ADVERTISEMENT