ILNews

IBA: $136,000 Put to Work by Bar Foundation

Back to TopE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

So far in 2010, the IBF awarded over $136,000 in grant support for IBA initiatives and to agencies with projects consistent with the IBF mission of advancing the administration of justice and understanding of law through philanthropy, education and service.

IBA projects focus on four key areas. Service to Community through pro bono efforts received $34,000, including funding for the IBA Pro Bono Coordinator. Activities include Ask A Lawyer and Constitutional books and voter registration at naturalization ceremonies. The second area funded, Service to Profession, includes diversity initiatives like the Job Fair and the IBA’s free publication Planning Ahead: A Plan for Protecting Your Clients in the Event of Your Disability or Death.

IBA Leadership Training and Scholarships received $8,000: four $1,000 grants for the Bar Leader Series Pay It Forward Project, and leadership development through attendance at the National Conference of Bar Presidents and the Bar Leader Institute. Scholarships for the Bar Review and Applied Professionalism courses and Bench Bar were funded.

IBA Educational Initiatives receive significant support. These include the Bench Bar conference and the Solo Practitioner/Small Firm Practice Online Service Center, enhancing education and services for colleagues in solo and small firms. The IBA’s Distance Learning Initiative for online education received $30,000.

This year, the IBF’s Grants Committee sponsored four deserving projects from agency applicants. The Indiana Coalition Against Domestic Violence provides legal services to those who seek protective orders in the Marion County Superior Courts. The Teen Court project sponsored by the Southside Youth Council (Reach for Youth) and the Kids’ Voice of Indiana, which trains and supports volunteer Guardian Ad Litems, each received $10,000 for projects in Marion County. Finally, the IBF approved sponsorship for Just The Beginning Foundation, which conducts a Summer Legal Institute serving sixty diverse Indianapolis students with an interest in law careers.

IBF ongoing grants and programs are maintained solely through the generosity and energy of its directors, fellows and donors. Thank you for your support in 2010.•

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Indiana State Bar Association

Indianapolis Bar Association

Evansville Bar Association

Allen County Bar Association

Indiana Lawyer on Facebook

facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. I need an experienced attorney to handle a breach of contract matter. Kindly respond for more details. Graham Young

  2. I thought the slurs were the least grave aspects of her misconduct, since they had nothing to do with her being on the bench. Why then do I suspect they were the focus? I find this a troubling trend. At least she was allowed to keep her law license.

  3. Section 6 of Article I of the Indiana Constitution is pretty clear and unequivocal: "Section 6. No money shall be drawn from the treasury for the benefit of any religious or theological institution."

  4. Video pen? Nice work, "JW"! Let this be a lesson and a caution to all disgruntled ex-spouses (or soon-to-be ex-spouses) . . . you may think that altercation is going to get you some satisfaction . . . it will not.

  5. First comment on this thread is a fitting final comment on this thread, as that the MCBA never answered Duncan's fine question, and now even Eric Holder agrees that the MCBA was in material error as to the facts: "I don't get it" from Duncan December 1, 2014 5:10 PM "The Grand Jury met for 25 days and heard 70 hours of testimony according to this article and they made a decision that no crime occurred. On what basis does the MCBA conclude that their decision was "unjust"? What special knowledge or evidence does the MCBA have that the Grand Jury hearing this matter was unaware of? The system that we as lawyers are sworn to uphold made a decision that there was insufficient proof that officer committed a crime. How can any of us say we know better what was right than the jury that actually heard all of the the evidence in this case."

ADVERTISEMENT