It’s already that time of year, when attention turns to nominating the Indianapolis Bar Association Board of Directors
slate. Because Indybar members are the greatest resource in identifying future leaders, a request for nominations has been
issued. Each Indybar member is encouraged to submit the name(s) of any Indybar attorney member for nomination to any of the
following offices:
1st Vice President (serves one-year term and will automatically assume the office of President-elect in 2013)
Secretary (two-year term, 2011 and 2012); and
At-Large Member of Board of Managers (five positions, each two-year terms, 2011 and 2012)
ABA Delegate (one-year term, 2011).
The Nominating Committee will endeavor to choose a slate of nominees, which reflects the Indybar’s geographic, ethnic,
minority, gender and practice area diversity while recognizing leadership and service to the Indianapolis Bar Association.
Serving on this year’s Nominating Committee are Chair George Plews of Plews Shadley Racher & Braun, Hon. Cale Bradford
of the Indiana Court of Appeals, Hon. Annie Christ-Garcia of the Marion Superior Court, Ryan Gardner an attorney at law, Doug
Hill of Hill Fulwider McDowell Funk & Matthews, Mary Panszi of Lewis Wagner LLP and Steve Peters of Harrison & Moberly
LLP.
In 2009, the Nominating Committee received over 30 letters of interest. A number of goals for the 2011 Board have already
been identified and will include the widening of member services, enhanced communications with members regarding the programs
and activities available through the Indybar, and the enhancement of the image and awareness of the Indybar and its members
in our metropolitan area.
Nominations should be forwarded to Indybar Nominating Committee, 135 N. Pennsylvania Street, Suite 1500, Indianapolis, IN
46204, email jarmstrong@indybar.org, or fax 317-269-1915. They must be received by September 1, 2010.•














The court of appeals not only tries to rewrite or interpret the law to suit their fancy, now they choose play stupid as well. Every consideration must be given to pro se litigants, who are not held to the same standards as attorneys, as stated by,SCOTUS. I assume they didn't have a lawyer, since one wasn't mentioned and I strongly suggest thatb the rest of the, origional petitioners get back in there and fight for their rights.
the irony of situations like this is that the clients whom conour cheated are the ones who should be pulling hardest for him to remain free and keep his law license, so they have some hopes of him paying back. really bury the guy deep and then there will be little hope of restitution
Qualified immunity, means that if you wear a badge, you are exempt from law and free to do anything you please! The courts will back badge toting individuals, because they think they are above the law as well. They think, they have judicial immunity, they do not.
Deeply, deeply concerned? I'll bet if it was the judge's money that had been swindled we'd see deep concern with actual consequences. First a Ponzi scheme, then a shell game with the assets…c'mon, hasn't Conour abused the judicial system and his clients long enough? I say enough already.
Wow, just wow.