IBA: Bar Leadership for 2011 in Place

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

With nearly 40 groups within the Indianapolis Bar to provide service and support, it takes great leadership to accomplish the lofty goals set for each. Indianapolis Bar Association President-elect Mike Hebenstreit has announced the appointed/election of the Bar members that have answered the call to serve as a Chair in 2011.

Alternative Dispute Resolution Section
Elisabeth Edwards, Jocham Harden Dimick Jackson PC

Appellate Practice Section
Jane Dall Wilson, Baker & Daniels LLP

Business Law Section
E. Joseph Kremp III, Wooden & McLaughlin LLP

Commercial and Bankruptcy Section
Kevin P. Dempsey, U.S. Bankruptcy Court

Criminal Justice Section
Alexander P. Will, Office of Corporation Counsel

Environmental Law Section
Vicki J. Wright, Krieg DeVault LLP

Estate Planning and Administration Section
Christi R. Anderson, Bingham McHale LLP

Family Law Section
Alicia Gooden, The Mediation Group

Government Practice Section
Sue Beesley, Bingham McHale LLP

Health Care Section
Leeanne Coons, Krieg DeVault LLP

Intellectual Property Section
Marta Paul, Woodard Emhardt Moriarty McNett & Henry

Labor and Employment Law Section
Jeffrey B. Halbert, Stewart & Irwin PC

Law Student Division
Kristin B. Arthur, Indiana University School of Law-Indianapolis

Litigation Section
Stephanie L. Cassman, Lewis Wagner LLP

Real Estate & Land Use Section
David Duncan, Tabbert Hahn Earnest & Weddle LLP

Senior Counsel Division
The Hon. Robyn L. Moberly, Marion Superior Court

Sole Practitioner/Small Firm Practice Section
Jason Reyome, J. Reyome & A. Demos Counselors at Law

Sports and Entertainment Law Section
Kenan L. Farrell, KLF Legal

Taxation Section
Katrina Clingerman, Ice Miller LLP

Women and the Law Division
Germain Willett, Ice Miller LLP

Young Lawyers Division
Colleen Powers, Hall Render Killian Heath & Lyman LLP

Bar Leader Committee
The Hon. Robyn L. Moberly, Marion Superior Court

Bar Review Committee
Kelly Eskew, Clarian Health Partners Inc.

Bench Bar Committee
The Hon. Sheila Carlisle, Marion Superior Court

Diversity Job Fair Committee
Tamara McMillian, Flashpoint HR

Finance Committee
Jeffrey Abrams, Benesch/Dann Pecar

Grievance Committee
M. Kent Newton, Newton Becker Bouwkamp Pendoski,PC

Justice Center Task Force
John F. Kautzman, Ruckeslhaus Kautzman Blackwell Bemis & Hasbrook

Legal Services Advisory Committee
Jeff Meunier, Attorney at Law

Legislative Committee
The Hon. Heather Welch, Marion Superior Court

Membership Committee
Aubrey Kuchar, Kightlinger & Gray

Nominating Committee
George Plews, Plews Shadley Racher & Braun

Paralegal Committee
Jodie L. Bergeron, Bose McKinney & Evans LLP

Personnel Committee
Mike Hebenstreit, Whitham Hebenstreit & Zubek

Pro Bono Committee
Andrew Campbell, Baker & Daniels LLP

Professionalism Committee
The Hon. Tanya Walton Pratt, U.S. District Court•


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. If a class action suit or other manner of retribution is possible, count me in. I have email and voicemail from the man. He colluded with opposing counsel, I am certain. My case was damaged so severely it nearly lost me everything and I am still paying dearly.

  2. There's probably a lot of blame that can be cast around for Indiana Tech's abysmal bar passage rate this last February. The folks who decided that Indiana, a state with roughly 16,000 to 18,000 attorneys, needs a fifth law school need to question the motives that drove their support of this project. Others, who have been "strong supporters" of the law school, should likewise ask themselves why they believe this institution should be supported. Is it because it fills some real need in the state? Or is it, instead, nothing more than a resume builder for those who teach there part-time? And others who make excuses for the students' poor performance, especially those who offer nothing more than conspiracy theories to back up their claims--who are they helping? What evidence do they have to support their posturing? Ultimately, though, like most everything in life, whether one succeeds or fails is entirely within one's own hands. At least one student from Indiana Tech proved this when he/she took and passed the February bar. A second Indiana Tech student proved this when they took the bar in another state and passed. As for the remaining 9 who took the bar and didn't pass (apparently, one of the students successfully appealed his/her original score), it's now up to them (and nobody else) to ensure that they pass on their second attempt. These folks should feel no shame; many currently successful practicing attorneys failed the bar exam on their first try. These same attorneys picked themselves up, dusted themselves off, and got back to the rigorous study needed to ensure they would pass on their second go 'round. This is what the Indiana Tech students who didn't pass the first time need to do. Of course, none of this answers such questions as whether Indiana Tech should be accredited by the ABA, whether the school should keep its doors open, or, most importantly, whether it should have even opened its doors in the first place. Those who promoted the idea of a fifth law school in Indiana need to do a lot of soul-searching regarding their decisions. These same people should never be allowed, again, to have a say about the future of legal education in this state or anywhere else. Indiana already has four law schools. That's probably one more than it really needs. But it's more than enough.

  3. This man Steve Hubbard goes on any online post or forum he can find and tries to push his company. He said court reporters would be obsolete a few years ago, yet here we are. How does he have time to search out every single post about court reporters and even spy in private court reporting forums if his company is so successful???? Dude, get a life. And back to what this post was about, I agree that some national firms cause a huge problem.

  4. rensselaer imdiana is doing same thing to children from the judge to attorney and dfs staff they need to be investigated as well

  5. Sex offenders are victims twice, once when they are molested as kids, and again when they repeat the behavior, you never see money spent on helping them do you. That's why this circle continues