ILNews

IBA: Building a Network for New Attorneys

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Many say the first year of practice is the most stressful of any lawyer’s career. Those that have been there know years two through five aren’t much easier. Working to build a career and create a positive professional reputation in this big, small town becomes much less stressful when you realize you’re not the only one. Sharing experiences, gaining access to information, and learning the grass isn’t greener on the other side is the greatest benefit of stepping out of your comfort zone and utilizing young lawyer membership in the Indianapolis Bar.

This big town becomes small when you network. However, to network you have to be in the room. Think you’ll be the only person in the room that doesn’t know anyone? Hardly. Consider taking advantage of some of these special offerings for young lawyers, and see how quickly your network grows.

Bar Leader Series...The Indianapolis Bar Association’s fast-track Bar Leader Series can help you make the most of your innate talents and develop your leadership skills. Attend this program and you will learn what it means to be a leader and succeed not only in your law career but also in service to professional, political, judicial, civic and community organizations. Any Indianapolis Bar Association attorney member who will be in her or his 3rd to 10th year of practice is encouraged to apply.

Young Lawyers Division…IBA attorney members with less than five years of practice or under the age of 36 are eligible to participate in the Young Lawyers Division, which provides relevant continuing legal education opportunities, quarterly social gatherings, Go Green activities, and public service programs.

Lawyer Referral Service...the Indianapolis Bar’s Lawyer Referral Service is the most affordable practice development tool in the city. For only $175 Indianapolis Bar attorney members in their first three years of practice may add the Lawyer Referral Service to their membership and gain access to the over 18,000 referrals made by Bar staff each year to potential clients seeking an attorney.

Applied Professionalism Course... this is a six-hour course that the Indiana Commission for Continuing Legal Education requires is offered twice a year by the Indianapolis Bar for attorneys in their first three years of practice. The course is held each spring and fall; registration is open for the Friday, October 29, 2010 full-day seminar at www.indybar.org.

Visit www.indybar.org or email Ashley Maxwell at amaxwell@indybar.org for more information!•

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
2015 Distinguished Barrister &
Up and Coming Lawyer Reception

Tuesday, May 5, 2015 • 4:30 - 7:00 pm
Learn More


ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. The $320,000 is the amount the school spent in litigating two lawsuits: One to release the report involving John Trimble (as noted in the story above) and one defending the discrimination lawsuit. The story above does not mention the amount spent to defend the discrimination suit, that's why the numbers don't match. Thanks for reading.

  2. $160k? Yesterday the figure was $320k. Which is it Indiana Lawyer. And even more interesting, which well connected law firm got the (I am guessing) $320k, six time was the fired chancellor received. LOL. (From yesterday's story, which I guess we were expected to forget overnight ... "According to records obtained by the Journal & Courier, Purdue spent $161,812, beginning in July 2012, in a state open records lawsuit and $168,312, beginning in April 2013, for defense in a federal lawsuit. Much of those fees were spent battling court orders to release an independent investigation by attorney John Trimble that found Purdue could have handled the forced retirement better")

  3. The numbers are harsh; 66 - 24 in the House, 40 - 10 in the Senate. And it is an idea pushed by the Democrats. Dead end? Ummm not necessarily. Just need to go big rather than go home. Nuclear option. Give it to the federal courts, the federal courts will ram this down our throats. Like that other invented right of the modern age, feticide. Rights too precious to be held up by 2000 years of civilization hang in the balance. Onward!

  4. I'm currently seeing someone who has a charge of child pornography possession, he didn't know he had it because it was attached to a music video file he downloaded when he was 19/20 yrs old and fought it for years until he couldn't handle it and plead guilty of possession. He's been convicted in Illinois and now lives in Indiana. Wouldn't it be better to give them a chance to prove to the community and their families that they pose no threat? He's so young and now because he was being a kid and downloaded music at a younger age, he has to pay for it the rest of his life? It's unfair, he can't live a normal life, and has to live in fear of what people can say and do to him because of something that happened 10 years ago? No one deserves that, and no one deserves to be labeled for one mistake, he got labeled even though there was no intent to obtain and use the said content. It makes me so sad to see someone I love go through this and it makes me holds me back a lot because I don't know how people around me will accept him...second chances should be given to those under the age of 21 at least so they can be given a chance to live a normal life as a productive member of society.

  5. It's just an ill considered remark. The Sup Ct is inherently political, as it is a core part of government, and Marbury V Madison guaranteed that it would become ever more so Supremely thus. So her remark is meaningless and she just should have not made it.... what she could have said is that Congress is a bunch of lazys and cowards who wont do their jobs so the hard work of making laws clear, oftentimes stops with the Sups sorting things out that could have been resolved by more competent legislation. That would have been a more worthwhile remark and maybe would have had some relevance to what voters do, since voters cant affect who gets appointed to the supremely un-democratic art III courts.

ADVERTISEMENT