ILNews

IBA: Court Seeks Commissioner Applicants

Back to TopE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Marion Superior Court is accepting resumes for full-time Commissioners. These positions may be assigned either to a rotation within the Marion Superior Court system (Criminal and/or Civil Division) or to the Arrestee Processing Center (A.P.C.).

If this position is assigned to the A.P.C., the work schedule for this position will be based on the facility’s operating hours of 24 hours per day, 7 days per work with holiday schedules. This position will be scheduled to work 10 hour shifts during their work week (7am-5pm, 7pm-5am), which will include weekend shifts and covering night shifts for 3 months per year. Applicants need to be aware that the work schedule will require days, evening/nights, and weekend work if assigned to the A.P.C.

For an A.P.C. assignment, job duties will include conducting initial hearings for misdemeanor and D Felony offenders, probable cause reviews and making bond/bail decisions.

If assigned to a rotation within Marion Superior Court, Criminal Division, job duties will include: conducting initial hearings; reviewing and ruling on motions; presiding at hearings and bench trials; conducting hearings and trials related to misdemeanors, D-felonies, Major Felonies and/or Domestic Violence cases; reviewing warrants and motions; and presiding over jury trials. If assigned to a rotation within Marion Superior Court, Civil Division, job duties will include: reviewing and ruling on motions; presiding at hearings and bench trials; presiding at hearings related to domestic relations and protective orders; and presiding over jury trials.

Applicants must be admitted to practice law in the State of Indiana with five years of practice and be in good standing with the Indiana Supreme Court. Marion County residency is required.

All applicants must submit a resume via email to the Director of Human Resources for Marion Superior Court at: pbova@indy.gov during the application window, which is July 1 – July 31, 2010.•

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Indiana State Bar Association

Indianapolis Bar Association

Evansville Bar Association

Allen County Bar Association

Indiana Lawyer on Facebook

facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Such things are no more elections than those in the late, unlamented Soviet Union.

  2. It appears the police and prosecutors are allowed to change the rules halfway through the game to suit themselves. I am surprised that the congress has not yet eliminated the right to a trial in cases involving any type of forensic evidence. That would suit their foolish law and order police state views. I say we eliminate the statute of limitations for crimes committed by members of congress and other government employees. Of course they would never do that. They are all corrupt cowards!!!

  3. Poor Judge Brown probably thought that by slavishly serving the godz of the age her violations of 18th century concepts like due process and the rule of law would be overlooked. Mayhaps she was merely a Judge ahead of her time?

  4. in a lawyer discipline case Judge Brown, now removed, was presiding over a hearing about a lawyer accused of the supposedly heinous ethical violation of saying the words "Illegal immigrant." (IN re Barker) http://www.in.gov/judiciary/files/order-discipline-2013-55S00-1008-DI-429.pdf .... I wonder if when we compare the egregious violations of due process by Judge Brown, to her chiding of another lawyer for politically incorrectness, if there are any conclusions to be drawn about what kind of person, what kind of judge, what kind of apparatchik, is busy implementing the agenda of political correctness and making off-limits legit advocacy about an adverse party in a suit whose illegal alien status is relevant? I am just asking the question, the reader can make own conclsuion. Oh wait-- did I use the wrong adjective-- let me rephrase that, um undocumented alien?

  5. of course the bigger questions of whether or not the people want to pay for ANY bussing is off limits, due to the Supreme Court protecting the people from DEMOCRACY. Several decades hence from desegregation and bussing plans and we STILL need to be taking all this taxpayer money to combat mostly-imagined "discrimination" in the most obviously failed social program of the postwar period.

ADVERTISEMENT