ILNews

IBA: Don't Miss Out on Free CLE Fridays at the IndyBar

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

It pays to associate...get six hours of Free CLE each year with the IndyBar!

These video replay CLE offerings are for IndyBar members only. Each IndyBar Member can attend up to six sessions at no cost; after six free sessions the cost is $30 per hour. There is no registration required. All replays are for one general continuing legal education credit unless otherwise noted.

The videos are replayed at the IndyBarEducation Center, 135 N. Pennsylvania St., Suite 1500.

Brown bag lunches are welcome.

February 15

Ethical Considerations for those Exiting or Entering State Government Service: Replay from 12/12/12 (includes 1 Hour of Ethics)

March 15

Introduction to Indiana Insurance Coverage: Replay from 8/28/12

April 19

Administering Special Needs Trusts: Replay from 11/28/12

May 17

Recent Developments in Investment Adviser and Investment Funds Law: Replay from 6/20/12

June 21

Financial Disclosure in Clinical Trials: FDA Financial Disclosure Regulations, HHS Financial Conflict of Interest Rules, Physician Payment Sunshine Act: Replay from 12/13/12

July 19

Top 10 Reasons You Meet the Disciplinary Commission: Replay from 11/1/12

August 16

Practical Considerations for Mediators: Replay from 10/4/12 (includes 1 Hour CME Credit)

September 20

Getting the Family Business Owner Off the Dime-How to Get Them Started on Business Succession Planning: Replay from 2/22/12

October 18

Hot Topics in Election Law: Replay from 10/4/12

November 15

Probating the Wrongful Death Estate: Replay from 3/1/12
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Indiana State Bar Association

Indianapolis Bar Association

Evansville Bar Association

Allen County Bar Association

Indiana Lawyer on Facebook

facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Such things are no more elections than those in the late, unlamented Soviet Union.

  2. It appears the police and prosecutors are allowed to change the rules halfway through the game to suit themselves. I am surprised that the congress has not yet eliminated the right to a trial in cases involving any type of forensic evidence. That would suit their foolish law and order police state views. I say we eliminate the statute of limitations for crimes committed by members of congress and other government employees. Of course they would never do that. They are all corrupt cowards!!!

  3. Poor Judge Brown probably thought that by slavishly serving the godz of the age her violations of 18th century concepts like due process and the rule of law would be overlooked. Mayhaps she was merely a Judge ahead of her time?

  4. in a lawyer discipline case Judge Brown, now removed, was presiding over a hearing about a lawyer accused of the supposedly heinous ethical violation of saying the words "Illegal immigrant." (IN re Barker) http://www.in.gov/judiciary/files/order-discipline-2013-55S00-1008-DI-429.pdf .... I wonder if when we compare the egregious violations of due process by Judge Brown, to her chiding of another lawyer for politically incorrectness, if there are any conclusions to be drawn about what kind of person, what kind of judge, what kind of apparatchik, is busy implementing the agenda of political correctness and making off-limits legit advocacy about an adverse party in a suit whose illegal alien status is relevant? I am just asking the question, the reader can make own conclsuion. Oh wait-- did I use the wrong adjective-- let me rephrase that, um undocumented alien?

  5. of course the bigger questions of whether or not the people want to pay for ANY bussing is off limits, due to the Supreme Court protecting the people from DEMOCRACY. Several decades hence from desegregation and bussing plans and we STILL need to be taking all this taxpayer money to combat mostly-imagined "discrimination" in the most obviously failed social program of the postwar period.

ADVERTISEMENT