ILNews

IBA Frontlines - 2/3/12

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Solada named Indianapolis Managing Partner of Bingham Greenebaum Doll

Bingham Greenebaum Doll LLP has named regional managing partners, including Mary E. Solada, Indianapolis. As was previously announced, the managing partners will serve on the firm’s management committee with W. Tobin McClamroch, Co-Chairman; Phillip J. Fowler and Dwayne C. Isaacs.

Bingham Greenebaum Doll LLP was recently formed by the merger of Bingham McHale LLP and Greenebaum Doll & McDonald PLLC. Regional managing partners will identify ways to bring the resources of Bingham Greenebaum Doll LLP to the firm’s clients in each market. The managing partners will also be responsible for leading the development of the firm’s attorneys in their respective markets.

3 Named Members of Frost Brown Todd

Frost Brown Todd has announced Matthew R. King, Anthony W. Overholt, and Amy S. Wilson have been appointed as members of the firm. Their admission to membership went into effect January 1, 2012.

Materials Available for Sold-Out IndyBar CLE

Though the “New Marion County Probate Rules” seminar sold out, materials and a digital copy of the presentation are available for purchase. Visit the online store at indybar.org and select the “CD and Materials” option to purchase a video copy of the presentation along with all materials distributed during the program. Please note: CLE credit is only available by attending the live presentation.

New Partners Announced by Faegre Baker Daniels

Faegre Baker Daniels LLP has announced the admission of 3 new partners, effective January 1, in the Indianapolis office. The partnership voted to admit John F.W. Fleming, Ryan M. Hurley and Jane Dall Wilson.

Hayes elected partner at Bingham Greenebaum Doll

Bingham Greenebaum Doll LLP, has announced that attorney Carl Hayes has been elected by the firm’s partnership to join their ranks.

Volunteers Needed for Naturalization Ceremonies

Courtroom connotations: stress, contention and opposition. Let us change that for you – participate in a warm, wonderful Naturalization Ceremony. Twice a month, the IndyBar sends representatives to the Naturalization Ceremonies to give welcoming words to the new citizens. Ceremonies are held in the Federal Courthouse, last about an hour and are held on Thursday mornings. For more information and to volunteer, go to the indybar.org website.

McMillian joins Bingham Greenebaum Doll

Bingham Greenebaum Doll LLP is pleased to announce that Tamara McMillian has joined the firm. McMillian’s practice will expand the firm’s Litigation Practice Group and will focus on the representation of businesses and business owners. McMillian began her legal career in trial work and litigation. Her most recent work focused on assessing operations and developing policies and procedures for corporations and large organizations. Previously, she served as the Associate Director of Professional Development at Indiana University Robert H. McKinney School of Law, where she focused on professional development, recruitment and coaching. McMillian is a graduate of DePaul University College of Law. She is currently completing her Master of Business Administration degree.

Assistance with Preparation of Last Wills and Testaments Available for Public

Through the Low Asset Wills Program, Indianapolis Bar Association attorneys draft wills for free as a service to the community. Qualified individuals can meet privately with an attorney who will draft a last will & testament and advance directives for them. Members of the public who wish to take advantage of this program should be directed to the indybar.org website to access additional information.

 Thank you to Legal Line Volunteers

Attorneys from Indiana Attorney General’s office and O’Koon Hintermesiter volunteered their time to staff the IndyBar’s free legal advice telephone program, Legal Line, in January. Providing service to the public included: Tammy Sommers, Anna Buschmann, Alice Burr, Jeffrey P. Hintermeister, Vicki Merriman, Adina Teska, Joel Thorp, and Linda Villegas.•

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. I gave tempparry guardship to a friend of my granddaughter in 2012. I went to prison. I had custody. My daughter went to prison to. We are out. My daughter gave me custody but can get her back. She was not order to give me custody . but now we want granddaughter back from friend. She's 14 now. What rights do we have

  2. This sure is not what most who value good governance consider the Rule of Law to entail: "In a letter dated March 2, which Brizzi forwarded to IBJ, the commission dismissed the grievance “on grounds that there is not reasonable cause to believe that you are guilty of misconduct.”" Yet two month later reasonable cause does exist? (Or is the commission forging ahead, the need for reasonable belief be damned? -- A seeming violation of the Rules of Profession Ethics on the part of the commission) Could the rule of law theory cause one to believe that an explanation is in order? Could it be that Hoosier attorneys live under Imperial Law (which is also a t-word that rhymes with infamy) in which the Platonic guardians can do no wrong and never owe the plebeian class any explanation for their powerful actions. (Might makes it right?) Could this be a case of politics directing the commission, as celebrated IU Mauer Professor (the late) Patrick Baude warned was happening 20 years ago in his controversial (whisteblowing) ethics lecture on a quite similar topic: http://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1498&context=ilj

  3. I have a case presently pending cert review before the SCOTUS that reveals just how Indiana regulates the bar. I have been denied licensure for life for holding the wrong views and questioning the grand inquisitors as to their duties as to state and federal constitutional due process. True story: https://www.scribd.com/doc/299040839/2016Petitionforcert-to-SCOTUS Shorter, Amici brief serving to frame issue as misuse of govt licensure: https://www.scribd.com/doc/312841269/Thomas-More-Society-Amicus-Brown-v-Ind-Bd-of-Law-Examiners

  4. Here's an idea...how about we MORE heavily regulate the law schools to reduce the surplus of graduates, driving starting salaries up for those new grads, so that we can all pay our insane amount of student loans off in a reasonable amount of time and then be able to afford to do pro bono & low-fee work? I've got friends in other industries, radiology for example, and their schools accept a very limited number of students so there will never be a glut of new grads and everyone's pay stays high. For example, my radiologist friend's school accepted just six new students per year.

  5. I totally agree with John Smith.

ADVERTISEMENT