ILNews

IBA Frontlines - 8/17/11

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Registration Fees Increase, New Portal Launched

Effective August 1, the annual licensing fee paid by attorneys to the Indiana Supreme Court has increased by $15 following an order by the Indiana Supreme Court that raises the fee to $145. Attorneys will also now pay their fees online through the Clerk of Courts portal, which also allows users to update their contact information and IOLTA data and designate surrogate attorneys.

Dunn Joins Frost Brown

Frost Brown Todd LLC has announced that Jeremy M. Dunn has joined the firm as a senior associate in the Indianapolis office. Mr. Dunn will practice in the Bankruptcy and Restructuring practice group.

Check Out the IndyBar Job Bank!

Looking for employment in Indy? Check out the IndyBar’s job bank at www.indybar.org, which currently features a posting for the Director of Legal Services for Turning Point, a regional provider of professional domestic violence services, among other postings for attorneys and summer associates. Employers--this is a great, low-cost way to advertise for open positions.

Changes Proposed to Marion County Criminal Law Local Rules

The Marion Superior Court has proposed changes to the Criminal Law Local Rules as they pertain to Initial Hearings and Review of Counsel. The full proposal may be found on the indybar.org website.

Comments to these proposed Local Rules are requested through Noon on September 7, 2011 and should be directed to the Office of the Court Administrator, c/o Glenn Lawrence, at Glenn.Lawrence@indy.gov. IndyBar members may also make their thoughts known to the Chair of the Criminal Justice Section, Alex Will. His email address is awill@indy.gov.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Indiana State Bar Association

Indianapolis Bar Association

Evansville Bar Association

Allen County Bar Association

Indiana Lawyer on Facebook

facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Family court judges never fail to surprise me with their irrational thinking. First of all any man who abuses his wife is not fit to be a parent. A man who can't control his anger should not be allowed around his child unsupervised period. Just because he's never been convicted of abusing his child doesn't mean he won't and maybe he hasn't but a man that has such poor judgement and control is not fit to parent without oversight - only a moron would think otherwise. Secondly, why should the mother have to pay? He's the one who made the poor decisions to abuse and he should be the one to pay the price - monetarily and otherwise. Yes it's sad that the little girl may be deprived of her father, but really what kind of father is he - the one that abuses her mother the one that can't even step up and do what's necessary on his own instead the abused mother is to pay for him???? What is this Judge thinking? Another example of how this world rewards bad behavior and punishes those who do right. Way to go Judge - NOT.

  2. Right on. Legalize it. We can take billions away from the drug cartels and help reduce violence in central America and more unwanted illegal immigration all in one fell swoop. cut taxes on the savings from needless incarcerations. On and stop eroding our fourth amendment freedom or whatever's left of it.

  3. "...a switch from crop production to hog production "does not constitute a significant change."??? REALLY?!?! Any judge that cannot see a significant difference between a plant and an animal needs to find another line of work.

  4. Why do so many lawyers get away with lying in court, Jamie Yoak?

  5. Future generations will be amazed that we prosecuted people for possessing a harmless plant. The New York Times came out in favor of legalization in Saturday's edition of the newspaper.

ADVERTISEMENT