ILNews

IBA Frontlines - 8/17/11

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Registration Fees Increase, New Portal Launched

Effective August 1, the annual licensing fee paid by attorneys to the Indiana Supreme Court has increased by $15 following an order by the Indiana Supreme Court that raises the fee to $145. Attorneys will also now pay their fees online through the Clerk of Courts portal, which also allows users to update their contact information and IOLTA data and designate surrogate attorneys.

Dunn Joins Frost Brown

Frost Brown Todd LLC has announced that Jeremy M. Dunn has joined the firm as a senior associate in the Indianapolis office. Mr. Dunn will practice in the Bankruptcy and Restructuring practice group.

Check Out the IndyBar Job Bank!

Looking for employment in Indy? Check out the IndyBar’s job bank at www.indybar.org, which currently features a posting for the Director of Legal Services for Turning Point, a regional provider of professional domestic violence services, among other postings for attorneys and summer associates. Employers--this is a great, low-cost way to advertise for open positions.

Changes Proposed to Marion County Criminal Law Local Rules

The Marion Superior Court has proposed changes to the Criminal Law Local Rules as they pertain to Initial Hearings and Review of Counsel. The full proposal may be found on the indybar.org website.

Comments to these proposed Local Rules are requested through Noon on September 7, 2011 and should be directed to the Office of the Court Administrator, c/o Glenn Lawrence, at Glenn.Lawrence@indy.gov. IndyBar members may also make their thoughts known to the Chair of the Criminal Justice Section, Alex Will. His email address is awill@indy.gov.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Indiana State Bar Association

Indianapolis Bar Association

Evansville Bar Association

Allen County Bar Association

Indiana Lawyer on Facebook

facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Such things are no more elections than those in the late, unlamented Soviet Union.

  2. It appears the police and prosecutors are allowed to change the rules halfway through the game to suit themselves. I am surprised that the congress has not yet eliminated the right to a trial in cases involving any type of forensic evidence. That would suit their foolish law and order police state views. I say we eliminate the statute of limitations for crimes committed by members of congress and other government employees. Of course they would never do that. They are all corrupt cowards!!!

  3. Poor Judge Brown probably thought that by slavishly serving the godz of the age her violations of 18th century concepts like due process and the rule of law would be overlooked. Mayhaps she was merely a Judge ahead of her time?

  4. in a lawyer discipline case Judge Brown, now removed, was presiding over a hearing about a lawyer accused of the supposedly heinous ethical violation of saying the words "Illegal immigrant." (IN re Barker) http://www.in.gov/judiciary/files/order-discipline-2013-55S00-1008-DI-429.pdf .... I wonder if when we compare the egregious violations of due process by Judge Brown, to her chiding of another lawyer for politically incorrectness, if there are any conclusions to be drawn about what kind of person, what kind of judge, what kind of apparatchik, is busy implementing the agenda of political correctness and making off-limits legit advocacy about an adverse party in a suit whose illegal alien status is relevant? I am just asking the question, the reader can make own conclsuion. Oh wait-- did I use the wrong adjective-- let me rephrase that, um undocumented alien?

  5. of course the bigger questions of whether or not the people want to pay for ANY bussing is off limits, due to the Supreme Court protecting the people from DEMOCRACY. Several decades hence from desegregation and bussing plans and we STILL need to be taking all this taxpayer money to combat mostly-imagined "discrimination" in the most obviously failed social program of the postwar period.

ADVERTISEMENT