ILNews

IBA Frontlines

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Last Call for Bench Bar

Have you registered yet for the IBA’s Bench Bar Conference on June 17-19 in Louisville? Don’t wait--register for the conference and find details at www.indybenchbar.org

Get Your IBA Legal Directory!

A limited number of 2010 IBA Legal Directories are available for purchase at the IBA office. This pictorial directory features listings for nearly 5,000 legal professionals in the Indianapolis area, plus contact information for local firms, courts and agencies. The price per book is $40, and orders can be made by visiting the IBA office or contacting iba@indybar.org . Did you pre-order your directory and indicate that you would pick it up from the IBA office? If so, your directory can be picked up during normal IBA business hours, Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.

Make the Connection

Join the Indianapolis Bar Association and the IBA Law Student Division for the 2010 IBA Summer Connection on July 29 from 5:30 to 7:30 p.m. for an evening of networking and socializing at the Skyline Club. Enjoy appetizers and cocktails while mingling with Indianapolis attorneys. This annual event is free for IBA members! Attorney members can register here; students should register at www.summerconnection.org.

Grooming Future Leaders

Attorneys in their third to 10th year of practice are encouraged to apply for the next class of the IBA Bar Leader Series. See how you can learn and grow to become a leader in the legal profession and the Indianapolis community. The Bar Leader Series is a nine-month program that starts each year in September; the 2010-11 class will be the eighth. Download the application here or at www.indybar.org. Deadline is June 21, 2010.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Indiana State Bar Association

Indianapolis Bar Association

Evansville Bar Association

Allen County Bar Association

Indiana Lawyer on Facebook

facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. I need an experienced attorney to handle a breach of contract matter. Kindly respond for more details. Graham Young

  2. I thought the slurs were the least grave aspects of her misconduct, since they had nothing to do with her being on the bench. Why then do I suspect they were the focus? I find this a troubling trend. At least she was allowed to keep her law license.

  3. Section 6 of Article I of the Indiana Constitution is pretty clear and unequivocal: "Section 6. No money shall be drawn from the treasury for the benefit of any religious or theological institution."

  4. Video pen? Nice work, "JW"! Let this be a lesson and a caution to all disgruntled ex-spouses (or soon-to-be ex-spouses) . . . you may think that altercation is going to get you some satisfaction . . . it will not.

  5. First comment on this thread is a fitting final comment on this thread, as that the MCBA never answered Duncan's fine question, and now even Eric Holder agrees that the MCBA was in material error as to the facts: "I don't get it" from Duncan December 1, 2014 5:10 PM "The Grand Jury met for 25 days and heard 70 hours of testimony according to this article and they made a decision that no crime occurred. On what basis does the MCBA conclude that their decision was "unjust"? What special knowledge or evidence does the MCBA have that the Grand Jury hearing this matter was unaware of? The system that we as lawyers are sworn to uphold made a decision that there was insufficient proof that officer committed a crime. How can any of us say we know better what was right than the jury that actually heard all of the the evidence in this case."

ADVERTISEMENT